In OOUI the close button is always on the left side. See
https://doc.wikimedia.org/oojs-ui/master/demos/?page=dialogs&theme=wikimediaui&direction=ltr&platform=desktop
The CSS hack to move it to the other side doesn't work and must be
removed. You can see the problem the moment the text is longer (which
can easily happen in translated versions).
I tried to come up with a more official way to move the button to the
other side, but gave up. One way is to replace the existing
flags: [ 'safe', 'close' ]
with:
flags: [ 'primary', 'close' ],
framed: false
But this causes other style problems. Let's remove the bogus CSS
first and possibly try again in a later patch.
Bug: T294839
Change-Id: Ia6ddefd99e4a03a87b0450ab94712ff19bb268e4
There was a remaining issue when the window was made very narrow in
desktop mode (smaller than 500px). This patch doesn't aim to really
"fix" the dialog's design in this case. The goal is to make the popup
window appear less broken, so the text can stil be read and the
buttons clicked. That's all.
This patch should not have any effect in:
a) mobile mode,
b) desktop mode when the window is wider than 500px.
Bug: T294839
Change-Id: I3171dbb991533b91eaadba63b78d0ff40aa486dc
When changing the source in the described-by attributes the screen
reader will read the text of the new source when the status changes.
Just changing the text within the elements holding the descriptions
does not work.
Bug: T291284
Change-Id: I31cc3061cf6c1f699babe41e99e0711f0eb03646
This patch fixes two issues:
* The bottom corner of the new sidebar was never correct because of
a `padding: 2px` that was introduced later, but never compensated
for.
* The moment the toolbar is shown it's not a single-template dialog
any more. This implies minor style changes.
Bug: T290262
Bug: T292727
Change-Id: I08da73880c469085994ee4beb3fcdd973f80ae11
I can't really tell what insight we get from the word "container".
Every widget is a "container" in some sense, isn't it?
This widget is just _the_ outline, I would argue.
Other suggestions?
Change-Id: I1fb27ee58c1a3dd790022504e978198dadf7ea02
The previous patch I15aa2c0 (approved by UX) was incomplete. The
required indicator was still shown, depending on the skin.
This patch also reduces the amount of generated HTML when it
doesn't have an effect anyway. At the moment an empty <span></span>
is generated for _every_ parameter in the dialog. That's potentially
hundreds. But the element is only needed for deprecated and
(in the old UI) required parameters.
A missing space is added while we touch this code anyway. The
missing whitespace between label and indicator icon is confirmed to
be a bug by UX.
Styles that are the same on all skins are moved to the .css file
that's loaded for all skins. Missing word-wrapping for overly long
template parameter names (on the right side of the dialog) is added.
The position of the indicator icon was broken on Minerva the moment
a parameter name is a bit longer. Fixed by replacing `inline-block`
with `inline`.
Bug: T290492
Change-Id: Ie346d88969cec2effaf90d328d08567ab7b7bf75
This just copies the colors from the old sidebar.
* When hovering with the mouse (without click/press) the background
is gray, and the text black. Relevant for readability via WCAG
AAA.
* On click/press the background is blue (slightly darker than a
selection), and the text is dark blue as well.
As noted in
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1V0rXMPr6upNjHF9AkROx4R8IF1LDZUzrG4K6oWT08sU
Change-Id: I443045b55826ef390688b32616dfdcfdc6555eb3
Before, the content pane (the right half of the dialog) was moved
to the right, outside of the visible viewport. But it was still
active and could i.e. be navigated to via the tab key. Only truly
hiding it solves this issue.
Bug: T274554
Change-Id: I8925a9cca0099528aca8e98452816b5f9dd23a76
* Use a more specific …-top property, as this is the only thing
we need to overwrite.
* Bring some selectors in a hierarchical order that makes more
sense.
Change-Id: If36db87d83f699fe0a43ac67d439cac42cbb1fa3
Proof of concept: while flex is – well – flexible, it feels like
this should be possible with some good old block containers and
margins. It's pixel-perfect in my test.
Bug: T288465
Change-Id: I1458900fff197e08ce318398524a3cf2b6b9ee2a
This fixes a few style issues:
* The buttons that represent top-level elements have a proper
2px focus rectangle again. Back to the OOUI default.
* The list of parameters does have a 1px focus rectangle all
around. Intentionally thin because there is a 2nd level of
keyboard navigation (via cursor keys) in this element.
* All these focus rectangles look the same in Firefox. Before,
it was a thin dotted line on the parameter list.
* Parameters with long names don't wrap on a 2nd line any more.
I believe this was working before but got lost in I92e8fd2.
Bug: T285323
Change-Id: I0229b6395a64a9903335bf96349af70fb20ad047
When I press the button to expand the input field for
undocumented parameters, it needs to be focused. Otherwise I
have to click it manually all the time.
We probably forgot to list this as an acceptance criteria when
working on Ic5dcd36.
This also replaced a bit of JavaScript with CSS. I do this
mainly because I found the mixture before (one piece was
hidden via JavaScript, another via CSS) a bit confusing.
Bug: T272487
Change-Id: I0cbee63c65a37f2f1860bde007c1e5c8408ba006
This is mostly, if not exclusively visual, at the moment. The
actual state is still managed by the old sidebar.
I made the element OptionWidgets for convenience. This gives us
all the functionality we need (primarily setSelected and
isSelected), without to much clutter. However, I didn't made
the container a SelectWidget. This comes with to much stuff we
don't need at this level, e.g. cursor key navigation.
Bug: T285323
Bug: T289043
Change-Id: I20dbd2ba23ceaa9125947b25e037c0bb3c91a471
The plan is to change the outer …TemplateWidget (which contains
a list of template parameter checkboxes) into a SelectWidget.
But this requires the elements in the list to be a subclass of
OptionWidget.
Note this change does not have any effect, as of this patch. But
this makes the following patches smaller and easier to follow.
Additionally:
* The OptionWidget class is already a LabelElement. No need to
initialize this twice. This happens via the parent constructor
now.
* Remove CSS that is not needed any more after Idc5e048. This is
not a FieldLayout any more.
* Update some related code documentation.
Bug: T285323
Change-Id: I92e8fd2bbece9e6c55083cdfe6ed7ad16a64d688
The icons have a padding of 6px around the icon image itself. To
get to the required 16px/8px space the margin was adjusted
accordingly. Note that there's also a 2px padding around the menu.
Bug: T272482
Change-Id: I3df9f355dfd5c4e6366432555b96bf788e784280
I get a scrollbar at the bottom of the sidebar. The reason is
that the container's width is 100% + 1px. The extra pixel is
from the border, which is not needed in this mode.
Bug: T274554
Change-Id: I4f749be6b9a7f89f9a7a195dc66c5c18253b1327
This is – for now – intentionally done in a way that can be
undone. This will still be helpful for debugging for a while.
But we need to get rid of the duplication to be able to make
this new functionality visible on the beta cluster.
Actual removal will hapen the moment we actually remove the
old toolbar. There are already tickets for this.
Bug: T286765
Change-Id: I842c3c39a55a273af20643fa8a602d2e57fb6b8c
This ellipsis was there before we started working on this code,
but was never working properly.
We understand that the CSS was intentionally done like this (as
the comment explains). However:
* We changed the width of the dialog. The old value doesn't
match any more.
* The width is different when the sidebar is expanded vs. when
it is collapsed. Even if we update the number, it won't
always work.
* The 100% work fine in current browsers. I can only assume
this was different back in 2014 when this CSS was written
(see Ia8259e9).
Bug: T285044
Change-Id: I3de2b0ed0b6a05d2b9fa0b325a2b12277564b271
Actually reusing this OOUI mixin gives us a lot of well
developed functionality we need anyway. Most notably proper
event management, e.g. click events.
The number of CSS properties we need to override is managable,
I would argue. Let's see:
* Our buttons are not inline-elements, but should use the full
width.
* No focus-border left and right for the same reason.
* We want much more inner padding.
* We want a stronger hover effect.
* We need to fine-tune the position of the icon. This is
because of the inner padding.
* Need to get rid of a negative margin that's only relevant
for inline-buttons.
I currently feel like the benefits are worth living with
slightly more brittle code. Note that we can undo this change
any time because all this is well encapsulated in this new
class.
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: I33f275a958964d49e803e56bf74a6fa961093da1
This introduces another generic "button-like" class that can
be reused in multiple places in the new sidebar. The main
change in this patch is the "add more information" button
which is now an instance of this new class as well.
This patch also simplifies over-complicated setup code in
related widgets.
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: I0cfe7675d02fdd5c5dc8d9198bb3f4aec9abf397
Before, the new sidebar was hacked in a place where it confused
the BookletLayout logic. This became visible when using the
up/down buttons to move elements in the sidebar.
This new container wraps the new and the old sidebar. It also
uses a temporary color to make it easier to see where one ends
and the other starts.
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: I4e5b40b1d1556886fc85cff9e926a02e4888f032
The two new widgets are pretty trivial now, thanks to the base
class.
Note there is still no code to delete the widgets. That's also
why you will always see a placeholder widget at the top. This
will be fixed with the next patches.
This patch also renames most of the "…TemplateOutline…" classes
to "…TransclusionOutline…" The reason is that these widgets are
not for a single template, but part of the container widget for
a more complex transclusion (i.e. a sequence of multiple
templates and wikitext snippets).
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: If4219b0b8ad4d1969ab1ec5ec4db0728811bab35
The icon and the name of the template are now created by the
base class. This is meant to be reused for other elements
that are not templates.
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: I76bbc0e8c0420e9c6357d093d5f5e1651a0c2719
This matches the existing naming scheme better. I also plan to
re-use this class for other types that are not templates.
That's why the name is the more generic "transclusion" now.
This patch also removes a `padding: 2px` that's not that
helpful. We will need paddings later, but need to choose them
much more carfully.
Bug: T274544
Change-Id: I6f0f630da2230b023b3fb065e5ad86d8211bb7b3
It's good practice to make transparent elements transparent
for mouse clicks as well, i.e. make it possible to select text
behind the fade effect.
Bug: T283943
Bug: T286235
Change-Id: Ib5022a74c70e4b7cb5e2a0faad20bd9abcc0da36
Introduces new widgets forming the backbone of the experimental
template dialog sidebar.
FIXME: `text-overflow: ellipsis` is not working yet, the container
styles need adjustment.
Bug: T274543
Change-Id: Ie81b84be288553343017c4aaf8691c4e266995f5
Both the template description as well as the parameter
description (including default value and examples) typically
contain longer texts. These can contain longer words that
"explode" the design. This is trivial to avoid.
Note this is not meant to fix this issue in all places where
it can appear. For example, a long parameter name causes the
same issue. But:
* Technically, it's not that easy to fix.
* Even if, it's not obvious how to fix it. Cut off the
container? Add ellipsis? Or wrap? How should the
surounding stuff float then?
This is all left out because of this. Focus on what's
obvious.
Bug: T284890
Change-Id: Id6700af168f5ab5ddde97d3f5ae63829b65a3be5
This dramatically simplifies the "mode" flag in
MWTransclusionDialog. The main reason to touch this code is:
The flag appears like it will be "single" when the dialog
contains a single template, and "multiple" when there are
multiple templates. But this is not true.
What the flag really does is show/hide the sidebar. The sidebar
is needed to be able to create multi-part templates. But a
dialog that already contains multiple templates can be set to
"single" mode (i.e. the user can collapse the sidebar), and
vice versa.
This patch focuses on private details inside of this class, but
keeps the terminology of a "mode" in some places. E.g. the
messages are not renamed to not cause unnecessary trouble for
translators.
Change-Id: Ib029fd48b393d2ab7d7cff6c842789e22989e944
Previously, if the checkboxes were shown on multiple lines (e.g. due
to a FlaggedRevs checkbox), there would be uneven margin at the
bottom. There was a special case to fix this only for the watchlist
expiry not-checkbox.
Change-Id: I006049cf23e6d42519bfa15b7ec30ea1bc5d08ac
These are the most minimal (and therefor most stable,
hopefully) hacks I could come up with so far.
Bug: T274903
Change-Id: I28ba414dd34aad756e29400eb656f0942291a923
Renames "Add a template" to "Template Search" in most cases and
provides inline help for the workflow.
Bug: T277028
Change-Id: I3fee87cb89b5044e785596e71ef3f1a18f2694ce
The name "description" conflicts with the TemplateData field name,
which is only one of several documentation fields.
Change-Id: I0942701204fe8499e8890740585b9a02c1d14c63
The internal name "more" conflicts with new collapsible buttons.
TODO: looks like TemplatePage has an analogous field?
Change-Id: I10b24758316a6cc3fbd236c77daffa014fcdafc6
When $wgVisualEditorTransclusionDialogInlineDescriptions is set to
true, the template dialog will use a larger format.
Bug: T273971
Change-Id: Iad3c3f4d65125c83e35414ce15f793f6a1b192ef
This was used when we used to pass API errors to showMessage, but
is now unused by the two remaining users (missing edit summary, and
"press ctrl+enter to submit").
Change-Id: I8a6b4db78d4e451cf3ec85fcdfd8293328aaaa3c
Reference images are moved to Cite and used by Citoid.
Bug: T170919
Bug: T171292
Depends-On: I02041246dda1b3d3ad1bcc0b014fa022e8259b62
Change-Id: Id97659ed1fa64a1223a8957fefaf2a149edd0e9c
The MWParameterSearchWidget that shows a list of all available
template parameters displays the (human-readable) label and
description of each parameter (both given via <templatedata>), as
well as the parameter's internal name and aliases, if there are
any.
This turns out to be non-helpful in the majority of situations:
* When there is no <templatedata> yet, there are no labels.
Instead, the names are used as labels, which means they are
*all* identical and everything is shown twice.
* The same happens when manually adding an "unknown field". Simply
start typing, and you can add parameters with any name. What you
type is shown twice (actually 3 times, 1 time in the input
field, 2 times in the result widget).
* Many template parameters are already nice, human-readable. Even
if <templatedata> exists and specifies labels, these labels are
often identical to the names. There is no need to come up with
something else if the name is already good enough. (Exception:
Localizations, but these are rare.)
Furthermore, this is a *search* result widget. The pretty much
only reason the names and aliases are shown is because the user
can search for them, and needs to understand why a parameter was
found. This still works fine.
For comparison, when a parameter is required you will *never* see
it's name, because the parameter is always there, and never shows
up as a search result.
Change-Id: I6b1dca1c94b2c496930b5bfdfe1c6f76898faa2a
The interface has enough space for 2 or 3 lines of text.
(On mobile, the button has only an icon and no label.)
Bug: T260074
Change-Id: I50b08029f843e91d10b8c81985f6dfacbb96c8e7
