These tags don't do much, if anything. But they provide a hint
in which scope a method might be used.
Bug: T284895
Change-Id: I0b4bdd416ee89d26961c4ded4d8bbace8c57da76
This reverts commit 950a5300dc.
Reason for revert: This broke several workflows. The reason is
that MWParameterPlaceholderPage & MWParameterSearchWidget both
hold references to the MWTemplateModel. This model is not
always the same. The dialog might be the same when a template
is edited multiple times. But the model might be a new one.
From this point on the MWParameterSearchWidget pulls data from
an outdated model.
Bug: T284636
Bug: T285571
Change-Id: I7b9ea8cab8f17705ec8020f07e3732da6ba0e73c
This does not revert commit 950a5300 but applies the most
minimal hotfix I could come up with.
The reason for the breakage is that MWParameterPlaceholderPage
& MWParameterSearchWidget both hold references to the
MWTemplateModel. This model is not always the same. The dialog
might be the same when a template is edited multiple times.
But the model might be a new one. From this point on the
MWParameterSearchWidget pulls data from an outdated model.
This extra check compares this model reference and creates a
new widget when it changed.
Bug: T284636
Bug: T285571
Change-Id: Ib3eca52bbff90ffbf56a257e3984adcbe02b310b
There is a codepath where `modelPromise` is undefined and
calling `modelPromise.then()` fails. This codepath implies
that the dialog is empty and there is nothing to update. We
can just close the dialog then.
I found this while debugging the actions in this dialog.
This happens when the dialog is empty (except for a
placeholder) but you submit it anyway. This is typically
not possible as the button is supposed to be disabled.
Still I think it's a good idea to make this code less
fragile.
The relevant code was introduced in Ibc2fc66 (2016).
Change-Id: Ia6b723548456c211b944a2320949bfc23b0afa16
This makes the code more readable and easier to reason about.
The ESLint rule responsible for this code style was removed
just recently.
Notes:
* I focus on classes that are relevant for what the WMDE team
does right now.
* I merge multiple `var` keywords only when the variables are
strongly connected.
* Caching the length in a for loop makes the code hard to
read, but not really faster when it's a trivial property
access anyway.
Bug: T284895
Change-Id: I621fed61d894a83dc95f58129bbe679d82b0f5f5
This not really just a checkbox widget anymore it inherits from
FieldLayout and became something more in that direction.
Let's use a mixture of these things to make it a bit clearer.
See also comment in Ie81b84be288553343017c4aaf8691c4e266995f5
Change-Id: Iff1746a8e5e94b56eb6c27465405aaf6b74c2310
Introduces new widgets forming the backbone of the experimental
template dialog sidebar.
FIXME: `text-overflow: ellipsis` is not working yet, the container
styles need adjustment.
Bug: T274543
Change-Id: Ie81b84be288553343017c4aaf8691c4e266995f5
We can skip all the up and down message passing by persisting the
parameter placeholders for each template dialog. If the parameter
list is expanded then the placeholder is deleted, on being created
again it will still have state.
To test: create a transclusion with two templates, each having many
parameters. "Add more information" to add parameters, expand the
list by clicking "Show <num> more fields", then delete the parameter
placeholder using the trash cans. Try different permutations to fool
the cache or collide with another template.
This is preparation for other template sidebar dialog work.
Bug: T284636
Change-Id: I23bdd38b173114c2a9afafc7465c4beb92d25869
These don't add any knowledge but make the code harder to read
and maintain, and are an additional source of errors.
Change-Id: Ied57741a3f985e355adfddb4e75378d5c497faa9
Begin to extract the wiring between a sidebar and the content pane of
the template dialog booklet layout. Eventually, this helper class
will present a high-level interface like "addPart(id)" and will take
care of creating the outline item, content page, and connecting
events.
Start very simple, take over the "focus" method.
Bug: T284632
Change-Id: I7bc73cc4386b99d95941fc6ed88ab5bd998de014
There are 2 methods with the same name, but they are very
different. This makes it much easier to understand the
difference, I hope.
Change-Id: Ie1f049b2b14e1fe23f078e281ee797da29dfe3db
The idea is to possibly rename some of these classes, based on
these descriptions. But this should be done in later, separate
patches.
Change-Id: I7f9e5b2382711b434d6dd618489fa3ed8b7a46b4
The names in the schema are roughly following what's
done in Schema:TemplateWizard. The information if
templates have TemplateData will be logged seperatly.
Bug: T259705
Change-Id: Iafa7256f675dbfd6a5a6de794061901780e3c55d
New changes:
202adf904 [BREAKING CHANGE] Unify FragmentInspector/Dialog behaviour
Local changes:
* Update dialogs to use common actions & FragmentWindow
Change-Id: Ib744b8996db48d1ee58bc873120400566c490e88
I have moved this block of code to the wrong place in change
13675e4a81. As a result,
`this.loaded` was being set early, so the dialog was treating
all of the pre-existing transclusion parts as newly inserted,
and the "Apply" button was therefore always enabled.
Bug: T209661
Change-Id: I3c1b45f91738ab6fc4a6f6d61ae5bf925c9a1bb5
I ran Closure Compiler over the codebase just to see what would happen,
and it printed some useful warnings.
Change-Id: I56d40b11e6d1dd7ce68a5e59da511f66e928647f
This is similar to the hack in ve.ui.MWMetaDialog, except uglier :(
We already explicitly focus the right field in the ready process.
I am not really sure why the focus change causes the issue, but
preventing it definitely fixes it. It would make sense if we changed
the value of the field after focussing it (as setValue() restores the
validity flag cleared by onFocus()), but we don't seem to do it.
Bug: T199838
Change-Id: Ia602551ee0b0885cefbd4cb2fc00d569ff42da67
The #getReadyProcess method should be used pretty much only to focus
a field inside the dialog after it is opened. It runs after the window
opening animation finishes, so if you add stuff to the window here,
that will be visibly delayed.
The #getSetupProcess method should be used pretty much for everything
else that depends on the opening `data`. It runs before the window
opening animation, so if you add stuff to the window here, it will be
visible while animating it.
Bug: T185944
Change-Id: I71ea5b6e1e1947c1cf8fd749100e854953a8ef3c
Pass through the current document when available, otherwise
assume the current surface's document.
Also add a getter for getPageName, so that can vary based
on the target document.
Bug: T193856
Change-Id: Ifdc951fdc6a43b924d102e3fcd7e59e52023757b
Also, pass $overlay to all PageLayout subclasses used in ve.ui.MWMetaDialog
and ve.ui.MWTemplateDialog/ve.ui.MWTransclusionDialog, for consistency.
Bug: T191395
Change-Id: Ib7ed2e2c04ff7930be1161bd2b981180ee59557a
This fixes the focussing problems from T166150.
As a separate consequence, when loading a template/transclusion
takes a while (it can take several seconds for e.g. a template with
100 parameters), we will now display nothing while the user waits.
Previously we displayed an empty frozen dialog (note that this only
worked the first time for some reason).
Bug: T166150
Change-Id: I414a72ee248517867eef63a75f2d327aa5d5b908
Make some of the methods we currently use to render the node
static so we can re-use them before inserting. We do the evaluation
without inserting the node so as not to dirty the document and
transcation history.
In the unlikely case the request fails, just fallback to inline.
This only handles insertions for now as type changes on edit will be
very rare.
This changes the signature of insertTransclusionNode, which is used
in Cite and Citoid extensions.
Bug: T51784
Change-Id: Ibc2fc66e6866084b0a4deeb082c8a1ca412febb2
