The plan is to change the outer …TemplateWidget (which contains
a list of template parameter checkboxes) into a SelectWidget.
But this requires the elements in the list to be a subclass of
OptionWidget.
Note this change does not have any effect, as of this patch. But
this makes the following patches smaller and easier to follow.
Additionally:
* The OptionWidget class is already a LabelElement. No need to
initialize this twice. This happens via the parent constructor
now.
* Remove CSS that is not needed any more after Idc5e048. This is
not a FieldLayout any more.
* Update some related code documentation.
Bug: T285323
Change-Id: I92e8fd2bbece9e6c55083cdfe6ed7ad16a64d688
The icons have a padding of 6px around the icon image itself. To
get to the required 16px/8px space the margin was adjusted
accordingly. Note that there's also a 2px padding around the menu.
Bug: T272482
Change-Id: I3df9f355dfd5c4e6366432555b96bf788e784280
This is what actually happens:
* We call `addParameter()`.
* This triggers an `add` event.
* This calls an `MWTemplateDialog.onAddParameter` event handler.
* This code doesn't check if a parameter already exists (because
it shouldn't). It detroys the page in the content pane on the
right and recreates it from scratch.
The only reason we do this is to focus the input field on the
right. This patch introduces a dedicated event to do this.
Bug: T288827
Change-Id: I47effe05427cfabfcf534920edee79521eaa033f
The history.replaceState call in onReviewModeButtonSelectSelect() (1)
ignores any changes to the document URL made by external tools such as
RevisionSlider, (2) replaces with an empty string the history entry
state object if it was set by external tools such as, again,
RevisionSlider. Both 1 and 2 result in a wrong URL ending up in the
address bar at some point. This patch addresses these problems, (1)
creating a new mw.Uri() object every time
onReviewModeButtonSelectSelect() is called, (2) keeping the current
history.state object.
The original variable storing the URI object is renamed to avoid
shadowing (optionally can be replaced with its value as it's used only
once).
Bug: T288636
Change-Id: Ieb97b561a6c076aa28aae231fe286ac4d1051bbd
I found this while working on T274551, which is all about the
definition of "empty".
In the old sidebar a parameter's name is dimmed (gray) as long as
the parameter's value is empty. This stops working entirely when
there is a default value.
My first impulse was "this is a bug". When there is a default
value, both the empty string and the default value (when the user
enters it exactly) typically trigger the same behavior: The
template uses the default value, just as if the user entered it.
But this code is correct because of the way it is used. Only
parameters that are "truly" empty should be visually marked as
such. The moment there is a default value it is either impossible
to change this back to an empty string – meaning the parameter
can never be truly empty – or the empty string is meaningful user
input.
Bug: T274551
Change-Id: I90657bfe83e56afd3942428c0dd8a47b444e39c9
This should not have any effect on how the thing looks and
behaves.
* All elements in the sidebar should be reachable with the tab
key, including disabled elements.
* Enter jumps to the corresponding paremeter in the content
area on the right. But enter doesn't change the checkbox
state.
* Space canges the checkbox.
The class will be renamed in the next patch.
Bug: T285323
Change-Id: Idc5e04828ece0ba77a65e4c839cd3ffccc3b6733
As discussed in Ia44da16. This change avoids possibly hundreds
of events (when a template does have hundreds of parameters),
and replaces them with a single one.
Bug: T288202
Change-Id: Ic819e8c93e872b653c238f396f1f327b6a8759d2
There is still a lot to do, but this implements some basic
behavior that was missing before.
* You can now use the tab key to navigate all checkboxes,
including disabled ones (required parameters).
* Enter key now works on both the checkbox as well as when
the entire line is highlighted. Enter forces the checkbox
to be checked and moves the focus to the content area.
* Mouse clicks now work on the entire line. Before, only the
text label was clickable.
Open issues (not to be resolved in this patch):
* Clicking the text label and the empty space after the text
label does different things. Probably shouldn't.
* Should a click on the label check the checkbox?
* Space key should probably not move the focus to the content
area.
* Focus rectangle is different on disabled rows. Is this ok?
* Background color when a line is focussed is missing.
Change-Id: I22ccd1bea92e4f098d4b25a9e38cddde5c103423
The checkbox is the first parameter in the parent constructor.
The parent is the FieldLayout class. The checkbox becomes the
this.fieldWidget in the parent class. Just use this instead of
storing a duplicate reference.
Bug: T274543
Change-Id: I4ae7d467334f88f2be93a62660145a025089401f
I get a scrollbar at the bottom of the sidebar. The reason is
that the container's width is 100% + 1px. The extra pixel is
from the border, which is not needed in this mode.
Bug: T274554
Change-Id: I4f749be6b9a7f89f9a7a195dc66c5c18253b1327
This check makes sure the user doesn't loose work when clicking
the back button. I would like to argue that neither of these
values is valuable enough to block the user with a confirmation
dialog:
* Literally nothing is lost when the input is empty.
* The auto-value is only temporarily lost, but will
automatically be restored when the user decides to add the
template back. The input field is pre-filled with this value.
* The default value doesn't need to be manually entered. It will
show up anyway when the parameter is missing.
There is a rare edge-case, but it is not really relevant in this
situation. Some templates allow to override a default value with
the empty string. This will be considered irrelevant by this
code. However, this was already happening before and doesn't
change with this patch.
The only edge-case where this patch makes a difference is if a
parameter is marked as required or suggested, is documented to
have a default value, _and_ the template allows to override it
with an empty string. But this combination is rather crazy, if
not bogus, and not worth considering here, I believe.
Bug: T274551
Change-Id: Ib176a82844335c3d4dd5b720d335ec28245e1637
This is really only about the methods name, but doesn't change
any behavior.
I realized we work with several different definitions of what
"empty" means. There are at least two significant definitions:
1. When a parameter's value is the empty string or identical
to the default value, the behavior of the template is the same.
It will use the default value just as if the user entered it.
The auto-value is a meaningful value in this scenario and can't
be considered equal to the empty string.
2. The context here is when the user presses the back button.
This will destroy all user input. But an auto-value is not user
input. It will appear again when the user realizes they made a
mistake. Nothing is lost.
Personally, I would not use the word "empty" to describe this
concept. Things like "containsUserProvidedValue",
"isCustomValue", "isMeaningfulValue", … come to mind. These are
all still a big vague. A "user provided" value can be identical
to the default or auto-value. "Custom" how? I went for
"containsValuableData" for now.
Bug: T274551
Change-Id: I2912a35556795c867a6b2396cbad291e947f0ed6
This is a direct follow-up to I6ebd020.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
* Make sure you have a template with a deprecated parameter.
The position doesn't matter.
* Add the template. The deprecated parameter is hidden.
* Add an undocumented parameter, e.g. "b". This is added to the
end, as it should.
* Add an undocumented parameter "a". This should appear before
"b", but doesn't. The reason is because the invisible
deprecated parameter is in the list that is used to calculate
the index, shifting it by 1 (or more when there are more
hidden parameters).
This patch includes a few closely related changes:
* We can loop the list of checkboxes directly instead of
indirectly via the list of parameter names.
* I made it so that an active filter only resets if it would
hide the new parameter. The original problem we had to solve
was that the new parameter would always be visible, even if
it doesn't match the filter. This awkward mismatch is still
guaranteed to not happen.
Bug: T274551
Change-Id: I1b0480ae836cc19b77b159d3fb30ff32e8c59df4
