new static method looks for annotation in annotation object.
ve2 Cleanup on annotate method and surface model.
Partially revive UI tools by exchaning old method usage
for ve2 methods.
Change-Id: Id0ac58330292d76801bbcf1d71a919b493f8ab9e
Functional changes (fixes):
* Make writeElement() also update parentNode and parentType for openings
* Also add to fixupStack when opening a wrapper for a text node
Non-functional changes (cleanup&docs):
* Document all variables at the beginning of the function
* Group variables according to where/how they're used
* Move expectedType into writeElement()
* Kill node, duplicates parentNode unnecessarily
* Kill paragraphOpened, was misnamed and unnecessary
* Rename closedElements to reopenElements
Change-Id: Ie5b4e4f30b267943048fdc170accb29139039192
* Push entire elements onto openingStack rather than type strings
* When closing an element, build a clone of the opening and push it onto
closedElements, then insert that clone when reopening the element
Change-Id: I8b0fb44394aed6c471dc6dacaab03e44c2333733
* Added converters to all relevant node implementations
* Added new annotation objects with their own factory
Change-Id: I9870d6d5eac45083929d74d2e58917d0939ca917
Also:
* Refactored tests
* Added tests for ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion
* Added tests for ve.dm.Transaction.newFromRemoval
* Fixed problems with ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion
* Added ve.dm.Node.canBeMergedWith which is partially a port of ve.Node.getCommonAncestorPaths merged with canMerge from within ve.dm.DocumentNode.prepareRemoval from the old ve codebase
Change-Id: Ibbc3887d08286d8ab33fd6296487802d65b319fa
Copy-pasting things like "text<IMAGE>moretext" failed spectacularly,
this commit fixes that.
* Check for content rather than structure in the inserted/removed data
* In the content case
** Run selectNodes() over the removal range, rather than just the cursor
*** i.e. no longer assume that content replacements only affect one node
** If there is structure involved, rebuild all affected nodes
Change-Id: I80e40b5b7c514a3fb105d57e4a17770d0fefaaea
Some of the replacement code was assuming that "does not contain
elements" and "is content" were the same. They're not any more, because
we have content nodes (like image) now, so I need a separate function
to distinguish between these cases.
Change-Id: I206ccdf082b7baddf99d382eb3cdd77ea34fb479
If the last element of the input data array was text, the resulting text
node would have length=0 rather than the expected length value.
Change-Id: I3d089a80b8a447a12ba411b2e11c1b84f14f2959
This was caused by the fact that a non-structural leaf can not have children, which makes it appear incompatible as a sibling to an arbitrary structural element (like a paragraph) but since it can not contain content we can check that instead.
Change-Id: Ie3c58b4b43f2aa6921f8f82aa82511e231207854
Using this argument will only return true if the offset is a place you can add any element to (hence the unrestricted part of it). This is good for testing if a paragraph could potentially be inserted there.
Change-Id: I6cc91da437c52493de03eb687b28966198270fea
This code still needs a lot of work, but it seems to work for most
cases. Things that still need to be done:
* Documentation and comments
* Handling of content and text nodes
** Use Trevor's isContent/canContainContent code which I don't have yet
* Preserve attributes when reopening closed elements
* Tests :)
Change-Id: I3bc16c964ef158693490a61ce12beb21e6fe2a9d
The 'insert' and 'remove' operations weren't implemented in the
transaction processor and were a holdover from the old DM
implementation.
Also migrated the tests, especially those that asserted that consecutive
insert/remove operations were combined (this is no longer the case now
that they are replace operations)
Change-Id: I2379fe92b331c5316f70f4b695397da41581cce9
Removed hard-coding of alien nodes, now aliens are automatically used for anything unknown, and block or inline aliens are selected based on whether the parent element can contain content or not.
Change-Id: I5d2a521ead4f4c96cb44d084a5c160cc20d8048e
in the new DM. Change method name getAnnotationRange from offset to
getAnnotatedRangeFromOffset. Write tests
Change-Id: I7028803065409e271ceced73e4803954d4a956dc
Splits and merges now work, or at least the tests for it pass
The strategy I used is to gather the affected ranges for each of the
following:
* removed stuff
* the entirety of each node touched by a non-zero removal
* if the inserted data busts out of its parent, the entirety of that
parent node (the 'scope')
then get the covering range of all those ranges, and rebuild that.
Change-Id: I7c3b421abc0ba134157ac8b59042675bb1b5073c
getAnnotationRangeFromOffset and offsetContainsAnnotation
which deprecated getAnnotationBoundaries, and getIndexOfAnnotation
write unit tests for proof
Change-Id: I6c0d4e3ca96dd569b1909cd22fce68c3a6fe382c
This means inserting things like </p><p> are now synced correctly and
split the paragraph in the model tree. Merges (removing e.g. </p><p>)
aren't supported yet.
Also, this needs tests, Trevor tells me he's working on porting replace
tests from the old ve/ directory
Change-Id: Ic5050849d7d007a1696dc36548654979aedb53a8
The tree sync for content replacements was adjusting the parent of the
text node affected, rather than the text node itself. This was because
it called getNodeFromOffset(), which returns branch nodes. Switched it
to use selectNodes() in leaves mode
Change-Id: I50a9be18151a1b75815ab19b787b16b6be385bf9
Now returning an empty array when a non annotated character is found
in the range. No longer looping through each annotation, simply
comparing to previous characters annotations and trimming differences.
Write additional test.
Change-Id: I41d2422a931a74325693edca409aed6d5da20ba8
This makes TransactionProcessor work for regular replacements, as well
as insertions and deletions of self-contained pieces of data. This does
NOT yet work for inserting and deleting unbalanced data
(splitting/merging nodes).
I've tested this from the console for insertions and deletions and
simple replacements, but I haven't tested wrappings. We should write a
bunch of unit tests for this some time :)
Change-Id: Ic2fd75d1cf2e127bc9ae58debce67576be2c912f
I was using data.length to check if the range was out of bounds, but
this is a problem when using selectNodes() inside of tree sync code
(which happens when performing rebuilds). While tree sync is in
progress, the model tree and the linear model don't match, so we
shouldn't be looking at the linear model for information about the model
tree. Instead, get the length of the DocumentNode and use that.
`
Change-Id: I11a378544ce1281a89cdcd4363c5cb1bf56f3434
Currently only implements mode=='leaves', i.e. traverse all leaf nodes.
Seems to work from casual testing, but is missing unit tests. See also
other TODO comments in this commit
Change-Id: I41292c21c627a18af7985e8ef9e23c7b14252b21
This gets rid of the length == outerLength-2 hack in getDataFromNode()
and will make it easier to implement similar logic in selectNodes()
Change-Id: I1294350b67ca3eefde2b7fe9fea0bc6d8b90f772
