This is the outer range of the parent of the node, if known. We'll need
this for change marking: when resizing a text node, for instance, we
need to mark its containing parent. This way we get the containing
parent's element's offset for free (selectNodes already tracks it in
currentFrame) rather than having to compute it with another traversal.
Change-Id: Ia335d8080ea9d414ab9f89b943e2ea0cd11d7df3
Some tests were using the wrong node in the expected data, but because
only the summaries were compared, this would succeeed as long as the
type and length were equal (and paragraphs of length 1 are quite common
in our test data). Fixed equalNodeSelection() to compare each node by
reference as well as comparing the summaries. If one of the equality
tests fails, the summaries will still be displayed as expected/actual
data (even though they might be equal), and the message will have
"(reference equality for selection[3].node)" appended to it.
This change broke the tests because a few test cases had bad data, fixed
those in this commit as well.
Change-Id: Iab420cf29d47f7368c8a9ce79f6309efae75685c
For <p>1<br/>2</p>, selectNodes([2,2]) correctly returned the end of the
first text node, but selectNodes([4,4]) returned index 2 in the
paragraph (i.e. between the break node and the second text node). The
correct behavior is to return the start of the second text node, i.e.
the mirror image of the behavior for [2,2].
Fixed this by applying the startBetween/endBetween logic only if the
relevant adjacent node is wrapped (or if it's missing). In the code,
this is expressed as !(adjacent node present && adjacent node wrapped).
Change-Id: Ie3b7fdf1de38ee253a798a7a73bc89734f4ca4fa
* For the most common case:
- replace ve.extendClass with ve.inheritClass (chose slightly
different names to detect usage of the old/new one, and I
like 'inherit' better).
- move it up to below the constructor, see doc block for why.
* Cases where more than 2 arguments were passed to
ve.extendClass are handled differently depending on the case.
In case of a longer inheritance tree, the other arguments
could be omitted (like in "ve.ce.FooBar, ve.FooBar,
ve.Bar". ve.ce.FooBar only needs to inherit from ve.FooBar,
because ve.ce.FooBar inherits from ve.Bar).
In the case of where it previously had two mixins with
ve.extendClass(), either one becomes inheritClass and one
a mixin, both to mixinClass().
No visible changes should come from this commit as the
instances still all have the same visible properties in the
end. No more or less than before.
* Misc.:
- Be consistent in calling parent constructors in the
same order as the inheritance.
- Add missing @extends and @param documentation.
- Replace invalid {Integer} type hint with {Number}.
- Consistent doc comments order:
@class, @abstract, @constructor, @extends, @params.
- Fix indentation errors
A fairly common mistake was a superfluous space before the
identifier on the assignment line directly below the
documentation comment.
$ ack "^ [^*]" --js modules/ve
- Typo "Inhertiance" -> "Inheritance".
- Replacing the other confusing comment "Inheritance" (inside
the constructor) with "Parent constructor".
- Add missing @abstract for ve.ui.Tool.
- Corrected ve.FormatDropdownTool to ve.ui.FormatDropdownTool.js
- Add function names to all @constructor functions. Now that we
have inheritance it is important and useful to have these
functions not be anonymous.
Example of debug shot: http://cl.ly/image/1j3c160w3D45
Makes the difference between
< documentNode;
> ve_dm_DocumentNode
...
: ve_dm_BranchNode
...
: ve_dm_Node
...
: ve_dm_Node
...
: Object
...
without names (current situation):
< documentNode;
> Object
...
: Object
...
: Object
...
: Object
...
: Object
...
though before this commit, it really looks like this
(flattened since ve.extendClass really did a mixin):
< documentNode;
> Object
...
...
...
Pattern in Sublime (case-sensitive) to find nameless
constructor functions:
"^ve\..*\.([A-Z])([^\.]+) = function \("
Change-Id: Iab763954fb8cf375900d7a9a92dec1c755d5407e
