Before the method fetchRequestAlways() was doing two entirely
different things. Note how the two function arguments are
split now. Each method uses only one of them.
Change-Id: I592a1f29fd9c677a0ff18115cccda36950172001
These methods are special in so far that they create *minimal*
wikitext where optional whitespace is not preserved. I tried
to rename the methods to reflect this, but could not find a
caller. What's used instead are the .serialize() methods.
Bug: T284895
Change-Id: Iedaa5b7efa9675151cc0553854d8aef3f9a46cbb
A lot of the checks are redundant. The first check still is
redundant because the later two cover everything as well. But
I left it for performance reasons.
Additionally:
* There was no test for the method.
* This patch also updates a few pieces of documentation in the
same class.
Change-Id: I10f2944a844cc070bdc08dec6719929b383e34fa
If a known parameter is present using one of it's aliases, then
only the aliased name should be shown to the user. This patch,
therefore, resolves the issue of the same parameter being added
to the sidebar twice.
When adding a parameter that is aliased, it will receive the same
position as the non-aliased parameter it is replacing.
Bug: T274545
Change-Id: If4e58c941fd0f0e690d3603935f5a5d3f9938163
This also removes a few lines of text that don't explain
anything that would not be obvious from the code or @return
tag anyway.
Change-Id: I2f8f02dd61c50d9990d72c0e8ea79d679c9b11f2
This fixes a minor issue in the spec class. In the first step,
parameters from the template are added to the list of known
parameters. Later, aliases are resolved. The original behavior
was that such a parameter moved to the end of the list. This
is rather unexpected.
This dosn't have much of an impact. The pretty much only place
where the parameter order from the spec can be seen is in the
parameter search widget. Still I believe it's worth fixing.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: I455818451811e92bba3e9320c2d41e1db8d563f2
I don't want this code to crash when the TemplateData API
returns an unexpected result.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: I237cbfbb85892a53a08d9e7e34cf4974775d627a
This is just not necessary. It removes a level of indirection
that possibly makes it harder to understand the code. It makes
it easier to possibly get rid of unused methods.
Change-Id: Iaf8b213a5e1ae64a24b5bcdf2a0b200d5d3cbf46
This doesn't "extend". It was never used like this. What it
actually does is to link between a (cached) TemplateData blob
and the spec class that want's to use it.
Is this the best possible name?
* fillFromTemplateData( … )?
* propagateTemplateDocumentation( … )?
* readDocumentationFrom( templateData )?
* …?
Do we want to rename the "spec" class as well?
* MWTemplateDocumentation?
* MWTemplateMetadata?
* MWTemplateDataAccessor?
* …?
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: I6c52ef42d411c2f47fc0080768d36ebda4dd2a55
Just store the JSON blob from the TemplateData API as is.
This comes with a bunch of nice consequences:
* Less code.
* Less class properties that don't do anything but copy what's
in the TemplateData blob.
* Easier to understand what's going on. The `this.templateData`
property is now a reference to the *actual* TemplateData
documentation.
* No need to cache the documentedParamOrder. Just do it when
needed.
This also removes an unused feature from the `extend()` method
that didn't made sense anyway. Before it was possible to merge
conflicting documentations. But this is not only unused, it's
impossible to have multiple documentations for the same
template.
The method acts as a straight setter now. The next patch will
rename it accordingly.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: I3ffc202577e9a20fc7491234601ccd981113f866
Instead of faking entries in this.params, let's use a separate
tiny data structure to keep track of parameters we have seen so
far, and in which order.
This finally allows to easily distinguish between documented and
undocumented parameters.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: Idf62b0661178a3bbef7e817edf016dbd572d415b
The so called "spec" class keeps track of parameters that have
been used before, no matter if documented via TemplateData or
not. Removed parameters are still "known" (i.e. have been seen
before).
This feature allows to easily find previously used parameters
names when an undocumented parameter was removed and the user
tries to add it again.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: Ia1555eea87cd99e7a3f386f4279ec5a80fb98a79
These tags don't do much, if anything. But they provide a hint
in which scope a method might be used.
Bug: T284895
Change-Id: I0b4bdd416ee89d26961c4ded4d8bbace8c57da76
In I04b8a14fbec7be5a1c4defabf92e94f694c1e638 we sepearted params from
aliases. There we missed that re-filling the parameters from the
template could re-add the aliases.
Bug: T285483
Bug: T285843
Change-Id: I1928b443a5f708bc8c57efa5ad0a86b5915b159c
While the term "canonical" is not wrong, I find it still
somewhat ambiguous.
1. "Canonical" could mean different things. E.g. is the order
of parameters as they appear in the article's wikitext the
"canonical" one? It's possible to argue like this, esp. if a
template doesn't have TemplateData documentation. In this case
the only order known is the one from the wikitext.
2. "Canonical" sounds like the parameters must be reordered.
But this should never happen. Not having dirty diffs is more
important than having the parameters in a specific order.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: I23658d37fea50b727667677ac6a49066673b2135
This property is a reference to a static variable with the
same name, initialized at the very top of the file. All
instances of the class use the same cache. They all use the
shared specCache directly, not the reference.
Depends-On: I0084410b7eab29048451ad67c18d6c2180c4f1b1
Change-Id: I9fd79ce3abd533dbb48a210e596802ea9e692855
These comments don't add any knowledge. The text is either
duplicated, or the method signatur says it already. Having
to read these comments just to realize that they don't give
any additional information is not helpful, even error-prone.
Change-Id: I014028b1e9311b831a22c37859b2130aed2e9539
Wait, what's going on here? This patch looks like it changes the
behavior of this code. But it doesn't. Here is what happened
before:
* Let's say a template contains 2 parameters, A and B.
* We don't know yet if these names are aliases.
* getParameterNames() returns [ "A", "B" ].
* extend() is called. The TemplateData documentation contains
the parameters "B" and "C". "C" does have an alias "A".
* extend() can't find "C" and adds it to the end, as if it's a
new parameter.
* extend() also iterates the aliases. For each alias it creates
a reference to the specification object. In this case a
reference from "A" to "C" is created.
* But "A" already exists. The position of "A" doesn't change,
but the specification now says it's an alias.
* getParameterNames() skips aliases. It skips "A" and instead
returns the new "C" from the end of the list.
This was the behavior before. It's unchanged, proven by the tests.
Change-Id: I04b8a14fbec7be5a1c4defabf92e94f694c1e638
The idea is to not actually store all these default values, but
fall back to the default only when needed.
Some more details:
* The only remaining property is ….name. The only reason to
have this property is to distinguish between aliases and
primary parameter names. This will be reworked in a later
patch.
* The description falls back to null because this is the
documented fallback, not undefined.
* The default value falls back to "", same as the auto-value.
Why not null you might ask. This is intentional. Both the
auto- and default value are effectively wikitext snippets,
while the example is a label in the VE UI.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: I1be3cca18f9ad6fc1c16362b24633f7613f02539
This is done for two reasons:
1. It fixes the behavior of two methods in rare edge-case
situations. They aren't documented to return undefined.
2. It reduces the amount of stuff this class stores when it's
nothing but a default value anyway. Note this patch does this
for the template-level properties only. Another patch will do
the same for the parameter-level properties.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: If2e4d56da1fa52e32dc94191f36d7dc6a1487829
This reflects much better how this method is meant to behave.
Note I will continue to remove documentation that doesn't
explain anything in addition to what the code already says.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: I81fa8a5d9d0752f3aeac4015c9a27b50e054d4df
This patch also marks 2 methods as @private that are not and
should not be used outside of this class.
Bug: T285483
Change-Id: I8a8ffc4868a369b5c47068beb0e83f023872543d
This reverts the revert commit d47b95eb4a.
When no `paramOrder` is given, known parameters should appear in the
order returned from the TemplateData API.
Previously, when TemplateData was present but no paramOrder
specified, then the parameters would appear in alphabetical order as
"unknown" parameters. Now they will appear in the order listed in
TemplateData. This is similar to the fully-specified behavior when
paramOrder is present.
This will only affect the Visual Editor template dialog, and has no
effect on serialization.
Bug: T274545
Change-Id: If8315781572af688ea1c1b14b3694b828f076b4a
This makes the code more readable and easier to reason about.
The ESLint rule responsible for this code style was removed
just recently.
Notes:
* I focus on classes that are relevant for what the WMDE team
does right now.
* I merge multiple `var` keywords only when the variables are
strongly connected.
* Caching the length in a for loop makes the code hard to
read, but not really faster when it's a trivial property
access anyway.
Bug: T284895
Change-Id: I621fed61d894a83dc95f58129bbe679d82b0f5f5
When no `paramOrder` is given, known parameters should appear in the
order returned from the TemplateData API.
Previously, when TemplateData was present but no paramOrder
specified, then the parameters would appear in alphabetical order as
"unknown" parameters. Now they will appear in the order listed in
TemplateData. This is similar to the fully-specified behavior when
paramOrder is present.
This will only affect the Visual Editor template dialog.
Bug: T274545
Change-Id: I32538de07641c288081042a41fe39eedfed7d939
Note that the tests expose a bug, getAllParametersOrdered fails to
list an unused parameter. Fixed in I32538de07641c.
Also, a minor fix to avoid an impossible template spec: paramOrder
must include all parameters.
Bug: T274545
Change-Id: Icfa7a765773d04ef05a76ecc09467305e311f6cb
There are at least 3 different methods that are all named
getWikitext, not counting subclasses. They behave rather
different, most notably in terms of whitespace preservation.
Bug: T284895
Change-Id: I8b47f5bd21675a431ba2bc2d4a8cb0c55dd50f76
Most notably:
* Introduce variable names that explain much better what's
going on.
* Reduce nesting.
Bug: T284895
Change-Id: I793677d8107abb6354f9e19d79c4879a41c4bd93
Splits out a useful intermediate calculation from getOrderedParameterNames,
exposing the full list of parameters including those that are not
present in the transclusion.
This will be used to build the sidebar checkbox list.
Bug: T274545
Change-Id: I1c6a9ea8a5e9a163751fee87f974f63c72fd1f61
These don't add any knowledge but make the code harder to read
and maintain, and are an additional source of errors.
Change-Id: Ied57741a3f985e355adfddb4e75378d5c497faa9
This class represents a raw wikitext snippet. There is also no
base class that would require us to follow a generic
getValue/setValue naming scheme.
Change-Id: I0891a2f6c0ae0121429a47c39221e99b9653e8e3
There are 2 methods with the same name, but they are very
different. This makes it much easier to understand the
difference, I hope.
Change-Id: Ie1f049b2b14e1fe23f078e281ee797da29dfe3db
Just reading the method signature gives the exact same
information in these cases. In other words, this code is
able to explain itself.
Change-Id: I04d031f2b24c3b0d21fede2c19c64b54d30b5b0c
The idea is to possibly rename some of these classes, based on
these descriptions. But this should be done in later, separate
patches.
Change-Id: I7f9e5b2382711b434d6dd618489fa3ed8b7a46b4
Returns true if there is no meaningful user input yet.
Will be used in the next patch.
Bug: T272355
Change-Id: I4f88ce31662bbc46755f78d574c46b907581d438
This parameter name was deprecated and replaced in 1.31. See also
Ie5fe2097cda45968bb080643d3afcac0b2868a6c
Change-Id: Ie9d6c70d3dfe3954504d3d698c122dceede7603d
Make ve.dm.MWTemplateModel#serialize ignore empty parameters if they were not
present in the transclusion before the edit. This avoids dirty diffs where an
user edits a template transclusion via VisualEditor, and the editor adds all
available template parameters to the edit wikitext, even if they were not
changed during the edit.
This logic was ported from the old Wikia-WMF VisualEditor project.[1]
Additionally, add tests for ve.dm.MWTemplateModel serialization.
---
[1] https://github.com/Wikia/app/pull/6450/commits/858eaa9
Bug: T101075
Change-Id: I35f8812724658904d30034db4e4684193a661c1e
I'm not 100% sure, but this looks like a copy-paste mistake to
me. Something like this (a subclass modifying the base class)
is not done anywhere else.
Change-Id: I24677c2deb721b68d1b534f1569c925b386d4d3d
Bring in ve.dm.MWInternalLinkAnnotation.static.getTargetDataFromHref
and ve.resolveUrl, so that the file has no dependencies on VE.
Change-Id: I03bc455d5484a6c51f3fa2397c64936b829fe7e3
When a template does not have user-provided TemplateData documentation,
the TemplateData API falls back to extracting possible parameters from the raw wikitext
to generate an API response with a list of potential parameters. However, it also
sets the "notemplatedata" field in the response, causing the VisualEditor to think
the response contains no useful information and ignore it. This appears to have been
an unintended side-effect of I97a1bfc9f9ead082a673a91b9d2053630a90309c.
This patch ensures that the VisualEditor will correctly consider such responses from
TemplateData by modifying ve.dm.MWTransclusionModel to check if the response contains
a parameter map. Some unit tests were added for the class to verify this behavior.
Bug: T243868
Change-Id: I72005880d9301a53224473900efe2917379e8708
A @method annotation is only necessary when the docblock is not
directly followed by a function declaration (in which case JSDuck
assumes it documents a property), e.g. when defining an abstract
function or referencing a function from another library.
I verified that JSDuck generates exactly the same output before and
after this change (docs/data-<hash>.js files are identical).
Change-Id: I7edf51a8560ab9978b42800ab1026f0b5555c3bf
While all of the following are valid in the model:
1. <mwBlockImage></mwBlockImage>
Image with no caption. Must use the media dialog to insert one.
2. <mwBlockImage><mwImageCaption></mwImageCaption></mwBlockImage>
Image with empty caption. There is a slug to insert a paragraph.
3. <mwBlockImage><mwImageCaption><paragraph></paragraph></mwImageCaption></mwBlockImage>
Image with caption with empty paragraph. Nice and intuitive!
(Same for <mwGalleryImage> / <mwGalleryImageCaption>.)
The third option is the most convenient for the user. We should always
generate that when converting documents from HTML and from the editing
tools (MWGalleryDialog, MWMediaDialog/MWImageModel).
Previously, the editing tools generated option 2 if no caption text
was entered, and the converter generated option 2 if there was no
caption node or if it was empty. Curiously, option 1 was never used.
Wikitext for manual testing:
```
[[File:Foo.png|thumb]]
[[File:Foo.png|thumb|]]
[[File:Foo.png|thumb|Caption]]
<gallery mode="packed">
File:Foo.png
File:Foo.png|
File:Foo.png|Caption
</gallery>
```
Bug: T200387
Change-Id: Ie82fb339f6bd8ae1b289235bf5402490722d9a7c
