in the new DM. Change method name getAnnotationRange from offset to
getAnnotatedRangeFromOffset. Write tests
Change-Id: I7028803065409e271ceced73e4803954d4a956dc
Splits and merges now work, or at least the tests for it pass
The strategy I used is to gather the affected ranges for each of the
following:
* removed stuff
* the entirety of each node touched by a non-zero removal
* if the inserted data busts out of its parent, the entirety of that
parent node (the 'scope')
then get the covering range of all those ranges, and rebuild that.
Change-Id: I7c3b421abc0ba134157ac8b59042675bb1b5073c
getAnnotationRangeFromOffset and offsetContainsAnnotation
which deprecated getAnnotationBoundaries, and getIndexOfAnnotation
write unit tests for proof
Change-Id: I6c0d4e3ca96dd569b1909cd22fce68c3a6fe382c
This means inserting things like </p><p> are now synced correctly and
split the paragraph in the model tree. Merges (removing e.g. </p><p>)
aren't supported yet.
Also, this needs tests, Trevor tells me he's working on porting replace
tests from the old ve/ directory
Change-Id: Ic5050849d7d007a1696dc36548654979aedb53a8
The tree sync for content replacements was adjusting the parent of the
text node affected, rather than the text node itself. This was because
it called getNodeFromOffset(), which returns branch nodes. Switched it
to use selectNodes() in leaves mode
Change-Id: I50a9be18151a1b75815ab19b787b16b6be385bf9
This was because the while loop was never entered as end >= left was
true from the start. Convert the while loop to a do-while loop to make
sure it runs at least once
Change-Id: I9c6436a7b296e65a36b8301095b6edd00507d321
Now returning an empty array when a non annotated character is found
in the range. No longer looping through each annotation, simply
comparing to previous characters annotations and trimming differences.
Write additional test.
Change-Id: I41d2422a931a74325693edca409aed6d5da20ba8
This makes TransactionProcessor work for regular replacements, as well
as insertions and deletions of self-contained pieces of data. This does
NOT yet work for inserting and deleting unbalanced data
(splitting/merging nodes).
I've tested this from the console for insertions and deletions and
simple replacements, but I haven't tested wrappings. We should write a
bunch of unit tests for this some time :)
Change-Id: Ic2fd75d1cf2e127bc9ae58debce67576be2c912f
This is for the case where we have a zero-length range in between two
siblings, and we need to know what index that corresponds to in order to
be able to insert nodes there (rebuildNodes() will use it for this
purpose)
Change-Id: I357d1cd665667a76f955a10b8d9d2810976cdbd7
* Initialize startOffset to 0 not 1, don't know what I was thinking
* Use currentFrame for nodeRange instead of parentFrame, don't know what
I was thinking there either
* If the returned node has no parent (is the document node), don't
attempt to access parentFrame and don't set index
Change-Id: Iad969a7c29436cdf4151ead7e9d3d8e2a30befb3
Selecting a zero-length range at the start or end of a text node
(e.g. (1,1)) would return the text node's parent instead of the text
node
Change-Id: I7fe089bf66b93185dd3415eff53aa7e04e3ffdb2
* Needs to be initialized to 1, not 0
* Needs to be stored *after* left is incremented to account for an
opening
Change-Id: I7978ae241578a8a17120e494684e6e93626a8529
* Text nodes do not have a wrapper to set classes on
* Use CSS class names that are equivalent to JS class names, swapping . with -
Change-Id: I49c877dd5c9b5dd2a9afad3137f12b14883043a1
