OOUI support for multiple modal window managers is hacky, and only
works correctly when the managers are attached directly to <body>.
Remove the wrapper that doesn't seem to be necessary.
Bug: T313690
Change-Id: I4134c0f50d28a364dcf15b426bd9b59a4f7a985d
The dialog is unusable when there is no outline. See T313489 for a
longer explanation.
Bug: T313489
Change-Id: Ib2cc9c363d3596a16f6f1c4aef03ca216abf6b1f
Apparently this can be undefined when Esc is pressed. Note this code
cleanup related to but does not fix T313690.
Bug: T313690
Change-Id: Ia4658f8e00a68ed4cc3a6ddb0a932b3218b813dc
Turns out we have two concepts, now represented by two methods:
1. A top-level part can only be moved or removed when it is actually
selected. This is relevant for the toolbar buttons and for the
keyboard shortcuts/hotkeys. We intentionally block the buttons
and hotkeys when a parameter is selected.
2. Adding a new part or parameter is always possible, no matter if a
top-level part or parameter is selected. This is again relevant
for the toolbar buttons and hotkeys.
Bug: T313388
Change-Id: I17caf8fce9d8f1ebe21660cf8c6d91ace8423490
Same issue as in the previous patch, but less intrusive. It was always
possible to add a new part, but it was often inserted at the wrong
position. It worked only as intended when a top-level part was
selected. When a parameter was selected, the new part was always
appended to the very end of the transclusion, not after the selected
template.
This is now a little bit of duplicate code. We might extract this to
a method in a later patch.
Bug: T313388
Change-Id: I1327222969d1d315bdacf3998f366d88c4c26bd5
The hotkey was only working when a top-level part was selected, not
when a parameter in a template was selected.
Some outdated helper methods are now marked as deprecated. They will
be replaced and removed in later patches.
Bug: T313388
Change-Id: I5ffe45fd00c36b97ee36dc0ba6831db5a941c731
250ms gaps are pretty common when typing at a normal speed, resulting
in a lot of (often expensive) API requests (e.g. T312319). For most
use cases this level of responsiveness in the preview is not necessary.
Change-Id: I6504567d4da02a66171ee35a9c4fd35c85136909
Using Parsoid HTML in the 2017WTE has enabled us to iron
out lots of rendering bugs over the past few years.
In that time Parsoid has been moved into PHP, and at some point
we also become the default parser.
Also more extensions have started to use content transform hooks,
which are only supported by the action API.
As a result it now seems like a good time to migrate back to the
content API instead of building the preview from Parsoid HTML.
Bug: T154844
Change-Id: I90d775dd71d5f5a61d651b63d946ab60a27e2ca3
Both parts are not relevant anymore:
- The first part is about focusing parameter placeholder pages.
These are added after load only when using the keyboard shortcut.
Focus will be done separately in that case.
- The second part is dead code since some time now. Also it is not
needed here. Scrolling to newly added parameters is done via the
setPage() method in the layout.
Bug: T289043
Change-Id: I928afef01b9e62a9da91db10340d9df78717e125
... except on mobile because the keyboard will expand.
Need to disable a spurious focus when the element isn't visible,
because this was making it impossible to focus later once it becomes
visible.
Bug: T290975
Change-Id: I0e6057d1cfbef24324a287e50e4988f935720c61
This was using the currentPage from the StackLayout. It will not
be updated there anymore.
Also removing the line about focus after toggle. We do not want
that anymore afaik.
Bug: T312015
Bug: T289043
Change-Id: I8b6eedd580d49604014118171c6da62849752d53
This event makes other calls redundant because it's always sent from
setPage and onReplacePart.
Bug: T311296
Change-Id: If214a713ed7299320d499c3e5687eda013fe0aab
This patch does a few closely related things:
* Replace a direct dialog → sidebar access with dialog → layout →
sidebar.
* Move the misplaced removeButton.toggle() to a more appropriate
place.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I5a2802aab587a6f7de4681bce4e9961a064ef8ee
These are internal to the two-pane layout and sidebar, so the dialog
doesn't need to be involved.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: I5f05bc119dc213d8e31db62a3808a2fadaf35d99
The one usage of this wasn't working. FIXME: maybe we want to
restore the behavior, to focus the first parameter in the dialog
after opening.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ibe0151fbedb3a9716bb231b5d398c4ae670fd667
This defaults to false. It looks like this default is used in the
MWTemplateDialog base class. However, it also looks like this base
class is never used on it's own. All users we know use the subclass
MWTransclusionDialog where "editable" is true.
https://codesearch.wmcloud.org/search/?q=%2C%5Cs*ve%5C.ui%5C.MWT(emplate%7Cransclusion)Dialog&files=%5C.js%24
In the process I also remove some comments that literally repeat the
code and don't add any knowledge because of this.
Bug: T310867
Change-Id: Ie245aab80d1e77a8406f5591062e9cf49fd9613f
This code was meant to select the first parameter of a template the
moment it is added. It's at least partly broken because it doesn't
consider the so called "prompted" parameters that have been added
just a few lines above. It's a questionable feature anyway. We are
going to refine all focus-related behavior anyway. Let's remove this
broken stuff and reimplement it later (probably in a different place)
when we continue working on this.
The FIXME was added in I720ce1a.
Bug: T311223
Change-Id: I1801efe38387b5e7a1b76417c1e5d7db4e4b96d0
This was done in 3 rather "random" places:
1. Whenever a template is manually added. But rather late, after the
template was added, in an event handler that is about focus
behavior. It should not continue to manipulate the template that
was just added.
2. When the dialog opens with a template preloaded by name, as it is
done from the citation menu.
3. When the dialog is about to finish loading.
This patch fixes 2 issues:
* Get rid of a duplicate call (number 2 and 3) when using the
citation menu.
* Move number 1 to a place where it's executed much earlier, and
only when the user clicks "add template" in a template placeholder.
There is no other way to add a template to an existing transclusion,
but it's still a more appropriate place I feel.
Bug: T311069
Change-Id: I8a65ad703b95ba2092e9ef73493e9903e96b0dd6
This causes one small behavior change: when deleting one of several
wikitext transclusions or a part following a template without
parameters, the selection would previously be set to the *previous*
part, and now it's the *next* part. This is arguably more consistent
with the behavior when removing eg. templates with parameters, after
which the next part is selected.
Doesn't affect removing parameters.
TODO: We might want to restore the already-broken behavior to focus
the first parameter of a newly-inserted template.
Bug: T310866
Change-Id: Ic5f47e31512d1a3949caf60613bd05b9a3bdf478
