Most notably:
* Introduce variable names that explain much better what's
going on.
* Reduce nesting.
Bug: T284895
Change-Id: I793677d8107abb6354f9e19d79c4879a41c4bd93
Splits out a useful intermediate calculation from getOrderedParameterNames,
exposing the full list of parameters including those that are not
present in the transclusion.
This will be used to build the sidebar checkbox list.
Bug: T274545
Change-Id: I1c6a9ea8a5e9a163751fee87f974f63c72fd1f61
These don't add any knowledge but make the code harder to read
and maintain, and are an additional source of errors.
Change-Id: Ied57741a3f985e355adfddb4e75378d5c497faa9
This class represents a raw wikitext snippet. There is also no
base class that would require us to follow a generic
getValue/setValue naming scheme.
Change-Id: I0891a2f6c0ae0121429a47c39221e99b9653e8e3
There are 2 methods with the same name, but they are very
different. This makes it much easier to understand the
difference, I hope.
Change-Id: Ie1f049b2b14e1fe23f078e281ee797da29dfe3db
Just reading the method signature gives the exact same
information in these cases. In other words, this code is
able to explain itself.
Change-Id: I04d031f2b24c3b0d21fede2c19c64b54d30b5b0c
The idea is to possibly rename some of these classes, based on
these descriptions. But this should be done in later, separate
patches.
Change-Id: I7f9e5b2382711b434d6dd618489fa3ed8b7a46b4
Returns true if there is no meaningful user input yet.
Will be used in the next patch.
Bug: T272355
Change-Id: I4f88ce31662bbc46755f78d574c46b907581d438
This parameter name was deprecated and replaced in 1.31. See also
Ie5fe2097cda45968bb080643d3afcac0b2868a6c
Change-Id: Ie9d6c70d3dfe3954504d3d698c122dceede7603d
Make ve.dm.MWTemplateModel#serialize ignore empty parameters if they were not
present in the transclusion before the edit. This avoids dirty diffs where an
user edits a template transclusion via VisualEditor, and the editor adds all
available template parameters to the edit wikitext, even if they were not
changed during the edit.
This logic was ported from the old Wikia-WMF VisualEditor project.[1]
Additionally, add tests for ve.dm.MWTemplateModel serialization.
---
[1] https://github.com/Wikia/app/pull/6450/commits/858eaa9
Bug: T101075
Change-Id: I35f8812724658904d30034db4e4684193a661c1e
I'm not 100% sure, but this looks like a copy-paste mistake to
me. Something like this (a subclass modifying the base class)
is not done anywhere else.
Change-Id: I24677c2deb721b68d1b534f1569c925b386d4d3d
Bring in ve.dm.MWInternalLinkAnnotation.static.getTargetDataFromHref
and ve.resolveUrl, so that the file has no dependencies on VE.
Change-Id: I03bc455d5484a6c51f3fa2397c64936b829fe7e3
When a template does not have user-provided TemplateData documentation,
the TemplateData API falls back to extracting possible parameters from the raw wikitext
to generate an API response with a list of potential parameters. However, it also
sets the "notemplatedata" field in the response, causing the VisualEditor to think
the response contains no useful information and ignore it. This appears to have been
an unintended side-effect of I97a1bfc9f9ead082a673a91b9d2053630a90309c.
This patch ensures that the VisualEditor will correctly consider such responses from
TemplateData by modifying ve.dm.MWTransclusionModel to check if the response contains
a parameter map. Some unit tests were added for the class to verify this behavior.
Bug: T243868
Change-Id: I72005880d9301a53224473900efe2917379e8708
A @method annotation is only necessary when the docblock is not
directly followed by a function declaration (in which case JSDuck
assumes it documents a property), e.g. when defining an abstract
function or referencing a function from another library.
I verified that JSDuck generates exactly the same output before and
after this change (docs/data-<hash>.js files are identical).
Change-Id: I7edf51a8560ab9978b42800ab1026f0b5555c3bf
While all of the following are valid in the model:
1. <mwBlockImage></mwBlockImage>
Image with no caption. Must use the media dialog to insert one.
2. <mwBlockImage><mwImageCaption></mwImageCaption></mwBlockImage>
Image with empty caption. There is a slug to insert a paragraph.
3. <mwBlockImage><mwImageCaption><paragraph></paragraph></mwImageCaption></mwBlockImage>
Image with caption with empty paragraph. Nice and intuitive!
(Same for <mwGalleryImage> / <mwGalleryImageCaption>.)
The third option is the most convenient for the user. We should always
generate that when converting documents from HTML and from the editing
tools (MWGalleryDialog, MWMediaDialog/MWImageModel).
Previously, the editing tools generated option 2 if no caption text
was entered, and the converter generated option 2 if there was no
caption node or if it was empty. Curiously, option 1 was never used.
Wikitext for manual testing:
```
[[File:Foo.png|thumb]]
[[File:Foo.png|thumb|]]
[[File:Foo.png|thumb|Caption]]
<gallery mode="packed">
File:Foo.png
File:Foo.png|
File:Foo.png|Caption
</gallery>
```
Bug: T200387
Change-Id: Ie82fb339f6bd8ae1b289235bf5402490722d9a7c
