These don't add any knowledge but make the code harder to read
and maintain, and are an additional source of errors.
Change-Id: Ied57741a3f985e355adfddb4e75378d5c497faa9
Begin to extract the wiring between a sidebar and the content pane of
the template dialog booklet layout. Eventually, this helper class
will present a high-level interface like "addPart(id)" and will take
care of creating the outline item, content page, and connecting
events.
Start very simple, take over the "focus" method.
Bug: T284632
Change-Id: I7bc73cc4386b99d95941fc6ed88ab5bd998de014
This reflects better what the method actually does. This patch
is a direct follow-up for the renames started in Ib029fd4.
Change-Id: Ie3e87139a5c2f5ac196e0fcc02fb897fadc99177
The names of the messages keys are very confusing. The order was set
wrong during refactoring in Ib029fd48b393d2ab7d7cff6c842789e22989e944.
We should rename the keys in a follow up in sync with translatewiki.
Bug: T284649
Change-Id: I43794d80b7df7d00441cb583ca53bcab03999e65
This reflects better what the widget actually does.
However, the config option `value` as well as the method
`getValue` are not renamed. These intentionally mirror a OOUI
convention.
Change-Id: I26e733b760501e57b3314d5da2d65bfdd4b38346
This dramatically simplifies the "mode" flag in
MWTransclusionDialog. The main reason to touch this code is:
The flag appears like it will be "single" when the dialog
contains a single template, and "multiple" when there are
multiple templates. But this is not true.
What the flag really does is show/hide the sidebar. The sidebar
is needed to be able to create multi-part templates. But a
dialog that already contains multiple templates can be set to
"single" mode (i.e. the user can collapse the sidebar), and
vice versa.
This patch focuses on private details inside of this class, but
keeps the terminology of a "mode" in some places. E.g. the
messages are not renamed to not cause unnecessary trouble for
translators.
Change-Id: Ib029fd48b393d2ab7d7cff6c842789e22989e944
This class represents a raw wikitext snippet. There is also no
base class that would require us to follow a generic
getValue/setValue naming scheme.
Change-Id: I0891a2f6c0ae0121429a47c39221e99b9653e8e3
There are 2 methods with the same name, but they are very
different. This makes it much easier to understand the
difference, I hope.
Change-Id: Ie1f049b2b14e1fe23f078e281ee797da29dfe3db
This does have a few advantages:
* Less code is executed and less memory consumed when these
elements are not needed.
* Code that belongs together is together.
* No local class properties are created when they are not
needed in the code below.
This patch is kind of a proof of concept. It touches only a few
classes we currently actively work with. If this change is fine
we can change some of the other classes the same way.
Change-Id: I9f548765034f1f69799fff41aeb6c147ff28b82d
The variable `html` had the value of undefined and was treated as a string.
This would then be displayed on the editing surface.
Change-Id: I4682ea121aa37f06cac41dde618af847586ae01e
New changes:
6cde8742e i18n: Rename keys for error messages in rebaser
Local changes:
* Rebaser i18n message renames
Change-Id: I0c2e3a956c81f625822bacd40835dc4fadb57211
The class .ve-init-mw-target-surface is used on the same element
as .ve-ui-surface. This element contains surface overlays
.ve-ui-overlay, which can contain other .ve-ui-surface elements
(inside inspectors), which would then erroneously have the target
surface styles applied.
Bug: T284312
Change-Id: I8d20a830dc48f6a098b0f9e9a7c7c1656de0fe56
Just reading the method signature gives the exact same
information in these cases. In other words, this code is
able to explain itself.
Change-Id: I04d031f2b24c3b0d21fede2c19c64b54d30b5b0c
The idea is to possibly rename some of these classes, based on
these descriptions. But this should be done in later, separate
patches.
Change-Id: I7f9e5b2382711b434d6dd618489fa3ed8b7a46b4
The main motivation for this patch is actually the comment. The
so called "spec" contains all parameters that are present in a
template, no matter if they are present in the TemplateData
documentation or not. This is critical here.
Change-Id: I5e1c79e3859a27562a9dea1d450cec196aa572ed
Depends on whether this is a new or existing template transclusion.
Split from Ib9b76cac7cd57245e8db2ef10879069a86a6269e
Bug: T276568
Change-Id: I4d22e32fef067b640e9a9389deffaace736c3405
When the existing search results don't contain an exact match
(see previous patch), perform an additional search for the
title. This uses OpenSearch. This is recommended in multiple
places and also used in the quick search field at the top of
MediaWiki.
Again, I came to the conclusion that an isolated unit test
would be complicated and not test much anyway. Better test
on-wiki.
Bug: T274903
Change-Id: Ib575248e089ff66814400202d224deff6369c772
This code detects a few edge-cases:
1. When some search results are exact matches, make sure they
are always at the very top.
2. When the prefixsearch API is used, e.g. as a fallback,
redirects show up as a separate metadata structure outside of
the pages array. Consider these and stop if there is already
an exact match.
3. CirrusSearch returns redirects as part of the pages array.
When there is an exact match, make these redirects separate
options and add them to the top.
All of this is case-insensitive, on purpose. In case two
templates with different capitalization exist, we rely on
the backend to return both. The code introduced here is fine
with this.
Notes:
* This doesn't guarantee an exact match is always there. This
requires an additional HTTP request and is done in the next
patch.
* I tried to write unit tests for this, but gave up. The setup
is complicated. An isolated unit test would not test much
anyway. Better test this on-wiki.
Bug: T274903
Change-Id: I64e1b5633e7b878a4d0d23d66229ca87e69d0045
These are the most minimal (and therefor most stable,
hopefully) hacks I could come up with so far.
Bug: T274903
Change-Id: I28ba414dd34aad756e29400eb656f0942291a923
