The first edit to a parameter will cause an event to be sent,
subsequent edits to the same parameter will not send an event.
Bug: T258920
Change-Id: Ibe663ce99a8fdf85a5add17186fb44fdbd4176bf
Record that a parameter was added, and whether it was known or
unknown--whether it's documented the TemplateData. Note that
`.isParameterKnown` returns true after an unknown parameter is added
to the template, so we need to set up the event early.
Bug: T258920
Change-Id: I5f8d8d06226474160a0a82c2e85a7fa4e22ba8cb
These constructors only take a single argument, so the api config was
being ignored and the input would fall back to the default `new
mw.Api()`.
The order is changed so that the "api" config is merely a default,
and can be changed by whatever comes later.
The UserInputWidget currently doesn't accept an "api" config. This
will be fixed in Ifb1dd9d. But this is not a blocker. Merging this
patch here before the other won't have any consequence. It will just
continue to ignore the "api" config. ;-)
Change-Id: I15c35216c717576c6767927cac06ef72198fc95a
The input field becomes a title autocomplete, showing small preview
images and searching only the File namespace.
This is consistent with how TemplateWizard behaves when editing a
File parameter.
Bug: T260886
Change-Id: I7a114e279436ec1ff6f7b8ab66443138ab12637f
A @method annotation is only necessary when the docblock is not
directly followed by a function declaration (in which case JSDuck
assumes it documents a property), e.g. when defining an abstract
function or referencing a function from another library.
I verified that JSDuck generates exactly the same output before and
after this change (docs/data-<hash>.js files are identical).
Change-Id: I7edf51a8560ab9978b42800ab1026f0b5555c3bf
There are cases where the page title and the real/desired page name
are not the same. Fixing that also fixes the suggestions that appear
in dialogs (see related bug).
Bug: T193132
Change-Id: Iafa84c05bea08ebb061ee6d1323eb50945b39815
When this code was written in 2013 (1a5bdd5bd2),
the langlinks API did not have a way to return the language names (autonyms).
This has been added in 2014 (4ba3a9aea96ee21c035c69999be23580e23f4e0a).
Change-Id: I70edb846d94b1108b079caf5915532234190da8f
Generating the templatesUsed list is relative slow, and is only
used in an obscure part of the editor, so only generate it when
needed.
Bug: T209078
Change-Id: I1cecdad65b80c4c9b1746e752ea4b41bc0fc0037
New changes:
202adf904 [BREAKING CHANGE] Unify FragmentInspector/Dialog behaviour
Local changes:
* Update dialogs to use common actions & FragmentWindow
Change-Id: Ib744b8996db48d1ee58bc873120400566c490e88
Extracted extractValue to a separate method
Added checkValidRedirect method to MWSettingsPage
Added errors when redirect address is invalid
Added 1 error message to localisation strings
Added 1 TODO (more precise error messages)
Bug: T74971
Change-Id: I8bcf16e97e5211671759acdf0846243df2c03fc2
This way users can rearrange/edit current name without exiting VE and/or copying it from somewhere else
Bug: T145339
Change-Id: I80690cdf344c2ccbdd8be486642afcf841f36c10
The initial value for the categories field is set asynchronously
(after potentially querying the MediaWiki API about the categories).
This caused the existing categories to "pop in" after the dialog was
opened (if you were on a slow network and it took more than 250ms to
query their information).
Additionally, it caused the "Apply" button to always be enabled if the
page had any categories on it (since the categories field was still
empty when extractSettings() was executed).
Bug: T207719
Change-Id: I46475a1eead91707edb8efe8cb7221a734818e16
Added 5 methods for MetaDialog (documented in code comments)
extractSettings
compareSettings
getAllWidgets
assignEvents
updateActions
Added 2 fields to MetaDialog
oldSettings
widgetList
Apply changes button now is only enabled when there are new changes
Added getFieldsets method to all subpages
Bug: T207719
Change-Id: Id51acf6c754d9a2572811775d83983e6ab9395b7
TemplateData doesn't always match up with the way the template is being used.
If a field has the `line` type, but is provided with newlines, we should avoid
mangling it by forcing it into a single-line field. As-is, any edit to the
template, even if the user only thinks they touched unrelated parameters,
would cause this.
Bug: T190191
Change-Id: I4f2a0b6c46532dcc268288cb209d0260b18f3ad7
