This is now consistent with all other events.
Needed for I9904e8af4a60b0f5e9a6e263cd4fd8e1e3fd1f98.
Change-Id: If52aa9d619eac08456874fc75c0f6e1adff01246
And factor out the common code for using a preference with a fallback to
localStorage or a cookie.
Bug: T235566
Change-Id: Ibb983319edcd2987225fe89677fd10e3ff8f9df6
This allows code in other extensions to suppress the welcome dialog
temporarily (just for that one page view), without touching the user's
preferences.
Bug: T235566
Change-Id: Ief6545289cf59fda851aa944b059994abd90253e
Move shouldShowWelcomeDialog() and stopShowingWelcomeDialog() from
DesktopArticleTarget to DesktopArticleTarget.init, and use them to
deduplicate code in init that manages the wikitext welcome dialog.
Look for both the vehidebetadialog and hidewelcomedialog URL params.
The code in DesktopArticleTarget used vehidebetadialog, but the code in
init for the wikitext welcome dialog used hidewelcomedialog.
Bug: T249954
Change-Id: I19f1a2da36bc65addb52811c3d3c73c1259bc8f5
This unbreaks the use of ?vehidebetadialog=1 on page views (i.e. without
action=edit) in single edit tab mode.
Bug: T249957
Change-Id: I0109f5d95cebbb3e585d25b7623764cc7350cda0
In MediaWiki, section numbers may be prefixed with 'T-' if they refer
to sections on a transcluded page, so they are not really numbers.
Change e2cb9ce93e caused us to treat them as strings most of the time,
but it looks like there are several places where we treated them as
integer numbers, which I missed when making that patch.
The first two changes in ArticleTarget#restoreEditSection fix T248795
and T248968/T249112, respectively. The other changes are cleanup.
Bug: T248795
Bug: T248968
Bug: T249112
Change-Id: I8373a7ab515595769ce6f3051a182c922415b643
Prevent JS from overwriting the contents of the "edit source" link
if the change is unnecessary as it can break third-party skins.
Bug: T248025
Change-Id: Ica1e45488813877583efadabc72526544e8943ac
When a page is preprocessed for transclusion, sections are numbered
differently, and the 'T-' prefix indicates this. It can't just be
removed.
It seems that all of our other code can handle section "numbers" like
"T-1" just fine.
Bug: T246164
Change-Id: If19a2d48f94411a89525fb605169c7f8dd4b1797
This line was added in 9eebfbcac5
and I can't tell what it was supposed to do (that commit's message
only says "Fix NWE-only edit tab", thanks a lot).
Since then the init code was refactored a lot, at some point this
line was moved to be a part of a completely different check (???),
and now it's causing visual mode to be disabled even though the
user only set their preferences to *prefer* wikitext mode.
Bug: T243723
Change-Id: I3c1f502c3cd079fc5eeb2e9587b22d854ae3a72c
This continues to take more effort than all other skins combined, but
still every time our overrides get less crazy. Maybe, and stay with me
here, maybe a year and five patches from now I'll remove the last one.
See 91f99ce78d for the last time.
Change-Id: Id880d1cd1ecef59635b347102dc2107204382fb2
In many places we check whether VE is available before doing things
(init.isVisualAvailable). This variable includes checks for whether
the page is wikitext, etc. Now it will also include checking whether
VE is enabled in user preferences.
In almost all places where init.isVisualAvailable is used, we were
already also checking if VE is enabled, so this doesn't affect the
behavior. But notably, we didn't do it when showing the option to
switch to VE in the welcome dialog and in the toolbar, causing T243723.
Changing init.isVisualAvailable this way makes it consistent with
init.isWikitextAvailable, which has always included a checking whether
NWE is enabled in user preferences.
Bug: T243723
Change-Id: Ie174bc3f16bceb29cb155b9223e0acef70167fd6
Previously, the ve-mw/init/ directory contained two kinds of files:
those that were used when initializing VE, and those that may be
loaded even if VE is not going to be initialized at all. The latter
kind must not use the `ve` global variable.
After moving those files to ve-mw/preinit/ we can enforce this with
.eslintrc.json in that directory. This would have prevented T228684.
(Technically they merely must not use `ve.init`, and may use `ve`,
but that's harder to enforce. We should instead move the few non-init
methods out of `ve`: now, track, trackSubscribe, trackSubscribeAll).
Also, group some files under ve-mw/init/: targets/ now (only)
contains ve.init.mw.Target and its subclasses, apiresponsecache/
now contains ve.init.mw.ApiResponseCache and its subclasses.
Bug: T228684
Change-Id: I945249a27f6a0fa10a432d5c5dc57bc7e0461fd8
