Clean up accountShouldSeeEditCheck since nothing is calling it but the
new method inside BaseEditCheck
Follow-up to e947e53f98
Change-Id: Ic55187bb77f5ef003369313b76a65897fb3be392
This was accidentally removed in d69d366469 during its refactor.
Because of the change to how checks are decided to be shown, I've made
AddReferenceEditCheck always be required -- later code in
hasAddedContentNeedingReference assumes that it's loaded anyway, so a
wiki deciding to configure it to not load at all for some account types
would have broken saving.
Bug: T373692
Change-Id: I007cd705451581ebacfa12e8ac5502bd1bc56a38
preSaveChecksShown + preSaveChecksNotShown = preSaveChecksAvailable
allowing us to use simple stat counters to detect errors in check
generation.
Follow-up to 57daf35bd6
Change-Id: I0586b766b5beec3bd059c90875ad0e2d1f092fab
Replace it with a hasAddedContentNeedingReference that'll need to be
kept in-sync with the internal logic in AddReferenceEditCheck while
we're tagging this.
Follow-up to d69d366469.
Bug: T367920
Change-Id: I9f4f96bf5c6c4b7b3131b1435426b2e283c9833a
They generate a lot of false positives in this extension.
Since this is client-side code, the worst that could happen is a
browser tab hanging, not any real security issues.
Change-Id: I177cfa7e57a6b7b528d558d2cba076e85fd0271f
When EditCheck is the first item in the menu, make the
anchor pink as well.
Relies on the :has selector in modern browsers.
Change-Id: I66e760742da25b3797529b0c65a8d90871a0a1da
Adds two new configs:
* ignoreSections, array of section names that'll be compared
* ignoreLeadSection, bool for whether to ignore the lead section
Bug: T346949
Depends-On: I7ded925b91b1d86b3c76c4135c85a3f0be1dee5e
Change-Id: I44f18fadcafbe011008d8abff566e2ccd7682f4f
The URL parameter turns out to be a bit painful for people to use in
some situations.
Bug: T350749
Change-Id: I7c88dc604dd321a7c78810b21f7ad8306ff9dab6
