mediawiki-extensions-Visual.../modules/ve/init/mw/ve.init.mw.Platform.js

85 lines
2 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

/*global mw */
/**
* VisualEditor MediaWiki initialization Target class.
*
* @copyright 2011-2012 VisualEditor Team and others; see AUTHORS.txt
* @license The MIT License (MIT); see LICENSE.txt
*/
/**
* MediaWiki platform.
*
* @class
* @constructor
Object management: Object create/inherit/clone utilities * For the most common case: - replace ve.extendClass with ve.inheritClass (chose slightly different names to detect usage of the old/new one, and I like 'inherit' better). - move it up to below the constructor, see doc block for why. * Cases where more than 2 arguments were passed to ve.extendClass are handled differently depending on the case. In case of a longer inheritance tree, the other arguments could be omitted (like in "ve.ce.FooBar, ve.FooBar, ve.Bar". ve.ce.FooBar only needs to inherit from ve.FooBar, because ve.ce.FooBar inherits from ve.Bar). In the case of where it previously had two mixins with ve.extendClass(), either one becomes inheritClass and one a mixin, both to mixinClass(). No visible changes should come from this commit as the instances still all have the same visible properties in the end. No more or less than before. * Misc.: - Be consistent in calling parent constructors in the same order as the inheritance. - Add missing @extends and @param documentation. - Replace invalid {Integer} type hint with {Number}. - Consistent doc comments order: @class, @abstract, @constructor, @extends, @params. - Fix indentation errors A fairly common mistake was a superfluous space before the identifier on the assignment line directly below the documentation comment. $ ack "^ [^*]" --js modules/ve - Typo "Inhertiance" -> "Inheritance". - Replacing the other confusing comment "Inheritance" (inside the constructor) with "Parent constructor". - Add missing @abstract for ve.ui.Tool. - Corrected ve.FormatDropdownTool to ve.ui.FormatDropdownTool.js - Add function names to all @constructor functions. Now that we have inheritance it is important and useful to have these functions not be anonymous. Example of debug shot: http://cl.ly/image/1j3c160w3D45 Makes the difference between < documentNode; > ve_dm_DocumentNode ... : ve_dm_BranchNode ... : ve_dm_Node ... : ve_dm_Node ... : Object ... without names (current situation): < documentNode; > Object ... : Object ... : Object ... : Object ... : Object ... though before this commit, it really looks like this (flattened since ve.extendClass really did a mixin): < documentNode; > Object ... ... ... Pattern in Sublime (case-sensitive) to find nameless constructor functions: "^ve\..*\.([A-Z])([^\.]+) = function \(" Change-Id: Iab763954fb8cf375900d7a9a92dec1c755d5407e
2012-09-05 06:07:47 +00:00
* @extends {ve.init.Platform}
*/
ve.init.mw.Platform = function VeInitMwPlatform() {
Object management: Object create/inherit/clone utilities * For the most common case: - replace ve.extendClass with ve.inheritClass (chose slightly different names to detect usage of the old/new one, and I like 'inherit' better). - move it up to below the constructor, see doc block for why. * Cases where more than 2 arguments were passed to ve.extendClass are handled differently depending on the case. In case of a longer inheritance tree, the other arguments could be omitted (like in "ve.ce.FooBar, ve.FooBar, ve.Bar". ve.ce.FooBar only needs to inherit from ve.FooBar, because ve.ce.FooBar inherits from ve.Bar). In the case of where it previously had two mixins with ve.extendClass(), either one becomes inheritClass and one a mixin, both to mixinClass(). No visible changes should come from this commit as the instances still all have the same visible properties in the end. No more or less than before. * Misc.: - Be consistent in calling parent constructors in the same order as the inheritance. - Add missing @extends and @param documentation. - Replace invalid {Integer} type hint with {Number}. - Consistent doc comments order: @class, @abstract, @constructor, @extends, @params. - Fix indentation errors A fairly common mistake was a superfluous space before the identifier on the assignment line directly below the documentation comment. $ ack "^ [^*]" --js modules/ve - Typo "Inhertiance" -> "Inheritance". - Replacing the other confusing comment "Inheritance" (inside the constructor) with "Parent constructor". - Add missing @abstract for ve.ui.Tool. - Corrected ve.FormatDropdownTool to ve.ui.FormatDropdownTool.js - Add function names to all @constructor functions. Now that we have inheritance it is important and useful to have these functions not be anonymous. Example of debug shot: http://cl.ly/image/1j3c160w3D45 Makes the difference between < documentNode; > ve_dm_DocumentNode ... : ve_dm_BranchNode ... : ve_dm_Node ... : ve_dm_Node ... : Object ... without names (current situation): < documentNode; > Object ... : Object ... : Object ... : Object ... : Object ... though before this commit, it really looks like this (flattened since ve.extendClass really did a mixin): < documentNode; > Object ... ... ... Pattern in Sublime (case-sensitive) to find nameless constructor functions: "^ve\..*\.([A-Z])([^\.]+) = function \(" Change-Id: Iab763954fb8cf375900d7a9a92dec1c755d5407e
2012-09-05 06:07:47 +00:00
// Parent constructor
ve.init.Platform.call( this );
// Properties
this.externalLinkUrlProtocolsRegExp = new RegExp( '^' + mw.config.get( 'wgUrlProtocols' ) );
this.modulesUrl = mw.config.get( 'wgExtensionAssetsPath' ) + '/VisualEditor/modules';
};
Object management: Object create/inherit/clone utilities * For the most common case: - replace ve.extendClass with ve.inheritClass (chose slightly different names to detect usage of the old/new one, and I like 'inherit' better). - move it up to below the constructor, see doc block for why. * Cases where more than 2 arguments were passed to ve.extendClass are handled differently depending on the case. In case of a longer inheritance tree, the other arguments could be omitted (like in "ve.ce.FooBar, ve.FooBar, ve.Bar". ve.ce.FooBar only needs to inherit from ve.FooBar, because ve.ce.FooBar inherits from ve.Bar). In the case of where it previously had two mixins with ve.extendClass(), either one becomes inheritClass and one a mixin, both to mixinClass(). No visible changes should come from this commit as the instances still all have the same visible properties in the end. No more or less than before. * Misc.: - Be consistent in calling parent constructors in the same order as the inheritance. - Add missing @extends and @param documentation. - Replace invalid {Integer} type hint with {Number}. - Consistent doc comments order: @class, @abstract, @constructor, @extends, @params. - Fix indentation errors A fairly common mistake was a superfluous space before the identifier on the assignment line directly below the documentation comment. $ ack "^ [^*]" --js modules/ve - Typo "Inhertiance" -> "Inheritance". - Replacing the other confusing comment "Inheritance" (inside the constructor) with "Parent constructor". - Add missing @abstract for ve.ui.Tool. - Corrected ve.FormatDropdownTool to ve.ui.FormatDropdownTool.js - Add function names to all @constructor functions. Now that we have inheritance it is important and useful to have these functions not be anonymous. Example of debug shot: http://cl.ly/image/1j3c160w3D45 Makes the difference between < documentNode; > ve_dm_DocumentNode ... : ve_dm_BranchNode ... : ve_dm_Node ... : ve_dm_Node ... : Object ... without names (current situation): < documentNode; > Object ... : Object ... : Object ... : Object ... : Object ... though before this commit, it really looks like this (flattened since ve.extendClass really did a mixin): < documentNode; > Object ... ... ... Pattern in Sublime (case-sensitive) to find nameless constructor functions: "^ve\..*\.([A-Z])([^\.]+) = function \(" Change-Id: Iab763954fb8cf375900d7a9a92dec1c755d5407e
2012-09-05 06:07:47 +00:00
/* Inheritance */
ve.inheritClass( ve.init.mw.Platform, ve.init.Platform );
/* Methods */
/**
* Gets a regular expression that matches allowed external link URLs.
*
* Uses the mw.config wgUrlProtocols variable.
*
* @method
* @returns {RegExp} Regular expression object
*/
ve.init.mw.Platform.prototype.getExternalLinkUrlProtocolsRegExp = function () {
return this.externalLinkUrlProtocolsRegExp;
};
/**
* Gets a remotely accessible URL to the modules directory.
*
* Uses MediaWiki's {wgExtensionAssetsPath} variable.
*
* @method
* @returns {String} Remote modules URL
*/
ve.init.mw.Platform.prototype.getModulesUrl = function () {
return this.modulesUrl;
};
/**
* Adds multiple messages to the localization system.
*
* Wrapper for mw.msg system.
*
* @method
* @param {Object} messages Map of message-key/message-string pairs
*/
ve.init.mw.Platform.prototype.addMessages = function ( messages ) {
return mw.messages.set( messages );
};
/**
* Gets a message from the localization system.
*
* Wrapper for mw.msg system.
*
* @method
* @param {String} key Message key
* @param {Mixed} [...] List of arguments which will be injected at $1, $2, etc. in the messaage
* @returns {String} Localized message
*/
Make use of new jshint options * Restricting "camelcase": No changes, we were passing all of these already * Explicitly unrestricting "forin" and "plusplus" These are off by default in node-jshint, but some distro of jshint and editors that use their own wrapper around jshint instead of node-jshint (Eclipse?) may have different defaults. Therefor setting them to false explicitly. This also serves as a reminder for the future so we'll always know we don't pass that, in case we would want to change that. * Fix order ("quotemark" before "regexp") * Restricting "unused" We're not passing all of this, which is why I've set it to false for now. But I did put it in .jshintrc as placeholder. I've fixed most of them, there's some left where there is no clean solution. * While at it fix a few issues: - Unused variables ($target, $window) - Bad practices (using jQuery context for find instead of creation) - Redundant /*global */ comments - Parameters that are not used and don't have documentation either - Lines longer than 100 chars @ 4 spaces/tab * Note: - ve.ce.Surface.prototype.onChange takes two arguments but never uses the former. And even the second one can be null/undefined. Aside from that, the .change() function emits another event for the transaction already. Looks like this should be refactored a bit, two more separated events probably or one that is actually used better. - Also cleaned up a lot of comments, some of which were missing, others were incorrect - Reworked the contentChange event so we are no longer using the word new as an object key; expanded a complex object into multiple arguments being passed through the event to make it easier to work with and document Change-Id: I8490815a508c6c379d5f9a743bb4aefd14576aa6
2012-08-07 06:02:18 +00:00
ve.init.mw.Platform.prototype.getMessage = function () {
return mw.msg.apply( mw.msg, arguments );
};
/* Initialization */
ve.init.platform = new ve.init.mw.Platform();