This patch includes two bugfixes:
1. The previous rule with a `p + p` didn't do what it was supposed to
do. It was adding a margin after the 2nd, 3rd and all following <p>
elements, but not between the 1st and the 2nd. It should have been
margin-top instead. The approach in this patch is different and
avoids the need to repead the 0.5em.
2. The red background color was not applied to the input fields any
more because OOUI doesn't use <input> elements any more.
Change-Id: Ia57b742e8b3cd29c1f55cd7e918f26f70eebab18
Some time ago there was a little bit of custom CSS applied to the HTML
table rendering. This is broken since patch I74214ea from 2016. This
patch renamed all CSS classes but forgot to update the PHP code
accordingly.
I decided to not change the HTML rendering because these class names
might already be used in custom per-wiki or per-user CSS. Instead I
partly revert I74214ea.
Unfortunately, some of the styles are quite dramatic, don't look good
or just don't work. I decided to remove some. The argument is that
the HTML rendering looks the same for 6 years now. I don't see a good
reason to change it now.
In detail:
* Suggested values are not aliases and should not be rendered in
gray.
* The message "no description" is rendered in gray and italics. But
this was applied to the wrong DOM element and made everything else
gray and italic as well.
* The color #777 is not readable, violating WCAG rules. While it's ok
to dim aliases and such, it must be at least #555 or darker.
* The "nowrap" destroys the table the moment one of the parameters
does have a longer name or alias. Let the browser handle this, as
it did for 6 years now.
* Same for rendering aliases as individual, indented blocks. This
makes the table unnecessarily big when there are many aliases, and
just doesn't look right. Again, let's stick to what we had for
6 years.
Change-Id: Idfa76eed6e2d68474c79d4674efce091cb031b66
It's required via the spec. We should act as if it's always there,
even when the actual "original data object" doesn't contain it.
Bug: T307331
Change-Id: I129b0c77e701df6ebbdc39432360cea8f10575e8
<pre> behaves very similar to <nowiki> in so far that whatever it
contains doesn't get parsed as wikitext. It might contain {{{…}}}
tripple brackets, but these aren't going to be activated as template
parameters.
Bug: T91326
Change-Id: I05c24e369d97c48161c565e2ef30969ec28c6a23
This method is not used anywhere else:
https://codesearch.wmcloud.org/search/?q=getRawParams
I tried to make the code a bit more readable. Notable:
* Make use of the return value we get from the preg_… function.
* {{3,} means "the character '{' 3 or more times". {{{+ does the
same. Note the { doesn't need to be escaped when it's not
followed by a number.
* At the end, it doesn't make any difference when we scan for
optional closing brackets. The moment we find at least 3 we are
done.
The test is intentionally not moved. This is something for a later
patch.
Bug: T301337
Change-Id: I55e31ceecea2ae7c35bcfbc2d641b35f751820db
Parameter names in a template can be numeric. While it makes a lot of
sense to force a specific format in the TemplateData JSON (i.e. only
strings), it's inconvenient and confusing if numbers are rejected for
being "invalid".
Effects of this patch:
* The incoming JSON is allowed to contain numbers in the aliases
array.
* However, the API normalizes these and forces all aliases to be
strings, as it was always documented.
* The editor component accepts anything in the aliases array, but
forces all aliases to be strings. Again, as documented.
* Note that it was never possible to use numeric keys in the `params`
list. This patch is only about aliases.
At the moment this is a somewhat "hidden" feature. We might or might
not update the documentation to officially allow numeric aliases.
Bug: T298795
Change-Id: I32ea296b4520e7f21b03a1f6390db4f43b613bdd
The autovalue field appears to be the only one with this edge-case.
This is because all other fields are either multi-lingual and
processed by the `….allowLanguages` code path above, or because
of other special-case handling somewhere else.
The idea is:
* Non-empty values are always added.
* When the property (in this case `"autovalue": "…"` existed
before, it's kept, even if it's now empty.
Bug: T295074
Change-Id: Ie4d9825b89edb4bbbbc4283dc48e9113e537869a
Mostly unused variable initializations. Note I'm inlining some
`var` keywords in this patch. This is in line with the current
style guides. See for example the discussion in I4f198e2 (search
for "hoisted" in the comments). However, I'm not changing the
entire codebase, as this is not the goal of this patch and also
just not necessary at this point.
Change-Id: Ibd80566c44584851ee2530d6b16dd28eb3db6bfe
Two main mistakes:
* The {...foo} syntax is for a variable number of parameters.
But this is not the case here.
* Optional parameters should be marked as such via [foo].
Change-Id: I0c26ea44fab6094616443ce8fae4fd47c61fd7c4
Parameters may include a `suggestedvalues` property, which is rendered
in the UI for some parameter types.
TemplateData editor UI elements are implemented behind the
TemplateDataSuggestedValuesEditor feature flag.
Bug: T271897
Change-Id: I14012c79b3fa0d48c58fd8999584cc03ec03575e
These are a mess and hard to de-localize. Also, the schema is
already documented as not including the namespace in this field.
A proper migration would be very difficult, so we'll have to remember
that our data includes this glitch and manually strip namespace
prefixes before the deployment date, as needed.
Change-Id: If2a4dd865b95458dc63162460f252500fd52436e
Adding a new widget that inherits from MultilineTextInputWidget but
is initialized with only one row and prevents using the return key
to add new lines.
Bug: T263533
Change-Id: I5423f5f04075d21abd7acf09b622fd6444feeeb2
… instead of 0. Conditionally add a dash in front as well to
avoid confusing results like '1' + sequence number = '12'.
Change-Id: I345704b00ba3812c4905f85e35cf21a6dfd05437
I looks like the Model.params data structure is build in a way
that it allows mismatching parameter "keys" and "names". E.g.
{
"a": { "name": "a" },
"a0": { "name": "a" },
}
There are comments in the code that suggest this is
intentional.
I found code that confused these two values and tries to use
the name as a key, for example. This fails, messes up the
paramOrder, and such.
This should not have much, if any effect for users because
users are blocked from doing this anyway, e.g. buttons get
disabled.
Change-Id: I2067024ad8d5b8e985a4f162cf6875f523777a6c
