This patch changes the way OOjs UI tooltips are constructed.
Until now we did not use the full potential of the widget.
Some strange behaviour remains and it seems we can not use
'horizontalPosition' here. Therefore the direction is passed
down to the RevisionsListView to center the tooltip manually
and margins are set for the help and arrow tooltips.
Bug: T159428
Change-Id: I0a67340da4d94f2f6b29e507f94fc695b44b71f9
Looks like custom settings used in a test for number separator
transformation added in Icc9bc09675151645055c7e7f706472a15cc81b0f
influenced RevisonSlider's tests resulting in test failure if
that core test was run before RS test.
Relevant RevisionSlider tests now are ignoring any custom value.
Any value before the test is restored after the test run, though,
in case other tests relied on this (which does not seem to be a case).
Bug: T153121
Change-Id: Ida81b93e4d081b6948e760995a92d182ad79fe0f
First I jumped on replacing both jscs and jshint with eslint but
it might be premature decision. Although linting with eslint
is possible (like in there is wikimedia config for eslint)
it is still not clear should it
But in case the change happens we will be ready.
Apart from config stuff this changes few bits spotted by eslint:
improves some indentation, removes weird spaces, completes some
doc blocks, changes IIFE forms in tests. These changes do not
seem controversial.
Change-Id: I9f8bf0f5745da8e662685f4cd879ea4baa609c01
Localized format of date containing month name, day, year and time
is used instead of format enforcing the order of time and date,
and use of short month name.
Bug: T141167
Change-Id: I39b2844e777beb986cefb3097d52d481bb038a63
Despite its documentation the "constructor" of RevisionList tends
to expect array of revision data in a format returned by API instead
of array of Revision objects.
Due to different name of ID fields in Revision object and in API array,
if "real" Revision object is passed to RevisionList, its ID is lost.
This changes RevisionList so that it only accepts an array of Revision
objects. This provides better abstraction.
This is basically a revert of I147270f28381038d05f8bcfd2317e8c269b2e458
which aimed at the same problem but suggested solution doesn't seem right.
Change-Id: Ic45cdd3e7b707a8c6a19eecf0a84d4c11696cd1f
There seems to be no good way to enforce language on the QUnit tests. It works
for the number formatting by setting the user language on the fly but for everything
else it fails. I simplified some tests and skip some tests or asserts when the language
is not 'en'.
I also added a helper to have conditions for skipping tests. This should be part of
QUnit IMO.
Still I dont know if this is something we should care about at all or just assume, that
devs will know what they do when they try to run tests.
Change-Id: I624ccf3984434e06200abffe7ccdd25b396251af
