First I jumped on replacing both jscs and jshint with eslint but
it might be premature decision. Although linting with eslint
is possible (like in there is wikimedia config for eslint)
it is still not clear should it
But in case the change happens we will be ready.
Apart from config stuff this changes few bits spotted by eslint:
improves some indentation, removes weird spaces, completes some
doc blocks, changes IIFE forms in tests. These changes do not
seem controversial.
Change-Id: I9f8bf0f5745da8e662685f4cd879ea4baa609c01
Localized format of date containing month name, day, year and time
is used instead of format enforcing the order of time and date,
and use of short month name.
Bug: T141167
Change-Id: I39b2844e777beb986cefb3097d52d481bb038a63
Despite its documentation the "constructor" of RevisionList tends
to expect array of revision data in a format returned by API instead
of array of Revision objects.
Due to different name of ID fields in Revision object and in API array,
if "real" Revision object is passed to RevisionList, its ID is lost.
This changes RevisionList so that it only accepts an array of Revision
objects. This provides better abstraction.
This is basically a revert of I147270f28381038d05f8bcfd2317e8c269b2e458
which aimed at the same problem but suggested solution doesn't seem right.
Change-Id: Ic45cdd3e7b707a8c6a19eecf0a84d4c11696cd1f
There seems to be no good way to enforce language on the QUnit tests. It works
for the number formatting by setting the user language on the fly but for everything
else it fails. I simplified some tests and skip some tests or asserts when the language
is not 'en'.
I also added a helper to have conditions for skipping tests. This should be part of
QUnit IMO.
Still I dont know if this is something we should care about at all or just assume, that
devs will know what they do when they try to run tests.
Change-Id: I624ccf3984434e06200abffe7ccdd25b396251af
