Per Id1339dc2, the LINK_ABANDON_* and PREVIEW_ABANDON_* actions can (and
should) be merged, as they are always reduced in the same way.
Change-Id: I71b30d4d2774deb4efea9e565f2ccd7383bf08c1
Initially, the link element was added to LINK_ABANDON_* to determine
when an interaction should be reset. However, this wasn't enough to
protect against timing-related bugs, e.g. T154923. Now that tokens are
used to determine when interactions should be reset, the link element
can safely be removed from the LINK_ABANON_* actions.
Supporting changes:
* Update the return type of mw.popups.actions.linkAbandon in its
DocBlock.
Change-Id: Iaaed7a4846af75f9c4051d7bc761022ea5b3f6cf
I2ecf575b introduced a regression where the linkTitleChangeListener
wouldn't destroy the active link's title if it had been dwelled on
within 300 ms of the previous active link being abandoned.
The LINK_ABANDON_END action is dispatched after 300 ms and ignored if
the active link has changed.
Change-Id: If0c16afd6ca1c44f0e7eed497f62f0190005a619
... instead of using the active elements, and check also the user
dwelling flag to only act if the user is not dwelling.
Preview and link abandon end and start share now test cases, meaning it
can be collapsed into one action creator in a followup commit.
Change-Id: Id1339dc23e8f1b1b7514c769cd09f8bdadc759b4
When dwelling back to a link, previously a new LINK_DWELL action would
be sent and the reducer would reset the interaction as if it was a new
one.
This shouldn't happen, since dwelling back to the active link (from
the preview, for example) is not a new interaction, and should not
create a new interaction or hide and show the preview.
With this change, the preview reducer has the notion of new or repeat
interactions, and only resets state on new ones, and only sets
isUserDwelling when dwelling on a the link of the current interaction.
Also when the interaction is repeat, we guard on the action creator and
don't trigger the wait or the fetch request.
Change-Id: I71cde81cbfe50b6f955e562e7e5b57d0f920fdb9
... after dwelling on preview.
Currently, the asynchronous PREVIEW_ABANDON_END action wouldn't be
ignored if the user were to have dwelled on the link that the preview is
about. The action is only ignored if the user is dwelling on the
preview, i.e. if preview.isUserDwelling is truthy.
Set preview.isUserDwelling to truthy if the user is dwelling either on
the link or on the preview.
Bug: T154923
Change-Id: I8e6989790da5884992ee9dda9e4895e2e58e6694
Unfortunately, QUnit doesn't complain that QUnit#module was being called
with a function and not an object.
Change-Id: I6d3b4941566fa4e4ecad2dbe6f7b5fdd62cdaf72
Changes:
- introduced PopupsGadgetsIntegration class handles all checks
- show help message on Preferences page when NavPopups is enabled
- unit test everything
Bug: T151058
Change-Id: Ia474b1b30378efe84dedf3ad47c1f833e88d69b5
Consider the user repeatedly dwelling on and abandoning a link. Testing
whether or not the element has changed before modifying state is not
sufficient. Fortunately, we already generate a unique token and include
it in the LINK_DWELL action for use in the eventLogging reducer - the
so-called "interaction token".
Change-Id: Iae9544055f7eccb4f7f071797eb360bc3456861a
Changes:
- removed onExtensionRegistration and related TODOs
- introduced onUserGetDefaultOptions hook
Change-Id: I6648802c19d90df36a211d6494033aca30c078ca
* To speed the time the tests spend running
* To make them reliably execute and not depend on magic numbers
Additional changes:
* Use mw.now instead of Date on checkin.js
* Split big setVisibleTimeout test into several smaller ones
* Extract helpers for the tests
Change-Id: I9d3233fccf6de0997f968d096e375df996e87786
While I1bf953b2 fixed the typo in FETCH_START_DELAY, it didn't do
anything to address the inconsistency in the time it takes to render a
preview (preview delay).
If the gateway result resolves before the target preview delay (500 ms)
is met, then delay dispatching the FETCH_END action until it is. If,
however, the gateway result resolves after the target preview delay,
then dispatch the FETCH_END action immediately.
Supporting changes:
* Expose the fetch action to ease testing it and to help tidy up the
mw.popups.actions.linkDwell tests.
Change-Id: Idf02343a0417cfbb33093a81d97ecebc5c1c7379
Test what mw.popups.haveCheckinActionsBeenSetup guards against so that
it doesn't have to be touched during the associated test.
Bug: T147314
Change-Id: I315e0782a0e3b1d04878f1ee6f538e54531f7df5
Use schema revision 16163887.
Add the 'checkin' action, which is accompanied by the 'checkin'
property. The action is logged at the following seconds
(Fibonacci numbers) after the page loads: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21,
34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, 2584, 4181, 6765.
The `checkin` property contains the values listed above.
Bug: T147314
Change-Id: Ib9ec7bd0e60aa34a04e32222b025347f6ee31794
Per #Design's mocks, the "Reading preferences" section should appear
immediately beneath the Skin section, if it's present.
Changes:
- onGetPreferences will try to inject PagePreviews option after
skin section or on the end of section when skin select is not available
- unit tests for new behaviour
Bug: T146889
Change-Id: Id14c0774aee917b7e949ab3ba5968a038b3ca933
Changes:
- added missing unit tests
- introduced PopupsContextTestWrapper, removed all unit-tests logic
from Hooks/Context classes
- removed getModule() from Popups.hooks.php, it's hooks responsibility
to keep single context instance
- removed class_exists calls, use ExtensionRegistry instead
- pass ExtensionRegistry as a dependency so it's easy to mock
- reach 100% code coverage
- introduce PoupsContext::isBetaOn() as it was used in many places
Change-Id: Id014efe72edf24628539c76968e53eb3e06709f4
Action changes:
* Update the BOOT action to include isEnabled and update the associated
tests.
Reducer changes:
* Make the preview and eventLogging reducers handle the BOOT action's
new shape.
Bug: T152687
Change-Id: I3fa2098269a32912eda99ceb8f13887688a14c15
The Page Previews A/B test was disabled in T144490. After the changes
for that task had been deployed we discovered that the old definition
for when previews are enabled was invalid.
Previews are enabled:
* If the beta feature is enabled and the user has enabled the beta
feature.
* The user hasn't disabled previews via the settings modal.
* And soon, if the beta feature is disabled and the user hasn't disabled
previews via their user preferences (see T146889).
Changes:
* mw.popups#createExperiment -> mw.popups#isEnabled
* Make mw.popups#isEnabled act like a factory to maintain backwards
compatibility.
* Update the associated tests.
Bug: T152687
Change-Id: I713a90dfb29866b27738e7d19e8a22518a12d417
When opening the settings dialog, the form didn't represent the current
enabled status of the application. This change makes sure that every
time the form is shown, the form state represents the current
application state.
If the application is enabled, then the 'simple' (Enabled) option is
selected on the form. If it is disabled then if there's Navigation
popups, it selects 'advanced' (Advanced popups), if there are not, it
selects 'off' (Disabled).
Changes:
* Change listeners
* Set the form state every time the form is going to be shown
* Update tests
* Supporting changes
* Add settingsDialog#setEnabled which updates the DOM form based on the
enabled flag and the navpops state
* Extract isNavPopupsEnabled function in settingsDialog.js to be used in the
form creation and also when setting the form enabled state
* Add test verifying changeListeners#settings shows and sets enabled state
properly when showing the dialog more than one time
Change-Id: Ic660f48d9a78e47c09a192ab86681196d2e01d61
Changes:
* Generalized previewCount change listener to syncUserSettings
* Added state.preview.enabled to be saved on change
Change-Id: I403a490fee9c8e125175996ba30c63c232b5598b
This changes introduces new option on Special:Preferences page that
allows users to enable/disable Page Previews feature.
By default feature is disabled. Temporarily option in Preferences
page is smoke and mirrors as switching logic is still WIP.
Bug: T146889
Change-Id: Ifdd17ce265d2d4c7583433ed4991443c563f1fe3
The save action has been implemented, and it is listened to by the
canonical enabled state in the previews reducer, and by the settings
reducer to perform UI changes.
The enabled state of the application has been kept in the preview
reducer as the canonical source of truth. See supporting changes for
documentation about the decision.
Actions:
* Introduce new action SETTINGS_CHANGE with the enabled status
* Trigger that action when clicking Save in the settings dialog
Reducers:
* Listen to SETTINGS_CHANGE in the preview reducer to update enabled
status
* On the settings reducer
* Handle the SETTINGS_CHANGE action
* Add showHelp flag to determine if the help should be showing
Change listeners:
* Switch to compare past vs present changes in the implementation
* Handle showing and hiding the help
Supporting changes:
* On the rendered settings dialog:
* Change #hide to actually just hide and remove legacy if statement
* Add #toggleHelp method to show or hide the help dialog
* Add doc/adr/0003-keep-enabled-state-only-in-preview-reducer.md to
support the decision of making the saveSettings action creator return
a Redux.Thunk and keeping the enabled state just in the preview
reducer.
* Add NB to actions#saveSettings explaining and linking to the
document
Follow commits soon:
* Persist the settings change to local storage when it changes, and
unify with the preview change listener
Change-Id: I80dc5f29fbe6286f2e3e3b50d909894bc5041ccd
