There are no browser qunit tests right now, and if they are added at
some point they should use core's infrastructure to run the tests like
in mobilefrontend for example.
Bug: T160406
Change-Id: I4346a891bc1fdb9252ebef593312911031cf2287
Tests are basically unchanged, except for some stubs on beforeEach.
Supporting changes:
* Bring stubs from the mediawiki library for mw.Uri,
mw.Title.newFromText and mw.RegExp into stubs.js
* Remove hook onResourceLoaderTestModules given there are no resource
loader test modules after migrating processLinks.test.js
Why bring stubs from real source? This is not optimal. It could be the
case that the stubs would need to be updated at some point in the
future. That's why in the comment of each stub, it is specified where it
came from, and what was changed to make it work. It is not optimal but
it should help with a future update if necessary.
Also checked the history of the stubs and these three stubs are very
stable with a small commits per year, usually adding some extra
functionality (not breaking changes) (the rest of the commits are
docs/format stuff), so the core behavior that we rely on here shouldn't
change in a fundamental way. See the github links:
* https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/commits/master/resources/src/mediawiki/mediawiki.Uri.js
* https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/commits/master/resources/src/mediawiki/mediawiki.Title.js
* https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/commits/master/resources/src/mediawiki/mediawiki.RegExp.js
Right now this stubs allow us to bring the test to run in isolation in
node.
The initial plan was to do change the test to be less test-case oriented
with dependencies on mediawiki.*.js and not to bring fake "real" stubs,
but after looking into it, given that:
1. the test cases in the test seem pretty informative showing the kind
of links that popups accepts
2. the stubs are acceptably easy to bring in, and are pretty stable
I decided to go with this approach initially to finish the migration
without changing the meaning of the tests.
If we want to remove the stubs and morph the test to verify stub calls
and move the test cases to documentation on the source, I'll tackle that
on a future commit.
Bug: T160406
Change-Id: Ieea378c9b7fec9116222b4a099c226d1f1131f65
If the user dwells on a link for long enough, then the gateway makes a
request, which is allowed to complete regardless of whether or not the
response is required.
If the user abandons the link but the request completes before the
abandon completes - currently, ABANDON_END_DELAY is 300 ms - then the
preview will be rendered temporarily.
Fix this by not rendering the preview if the user has started to abandon
the link.
Bug: T163350
Change-Id: I154dde4e3ccaed3d11cb023c85c44451fc0ad957
* Merge mwe-popups-icon with mwe-popups-settings-icon
* Remove PNG - now generated by the ResourceLoader module
* Adjust popup footer paddings/widths and store them in variables
* RTL and LTR compatible
Bug: T133956
Change-Id: I14ccd7b6731e9ec49f9959411fd17f7c9fdf43be
When the user dwells on a link and there's enough room to display a
preview above it, then the preview should rest atop the link rather than
above the mouse.
Bug: T161366
Change-Id: Ia7266f6e5c272817581bdbcb3710429b266556e4
If the user CmdOrCtrl+Clicks on a link, then the link will remain
focussed. If a preview is shown, clicks another element on the page, and
then there'll be no token to include in ABANDON_* with.
Bug: T162924
Change-Id: Ie2237aa55ea9a11070498b66c73b8bf1898d8d44
I09d8776 introduced a bug in the eventLogging reducer where reducing
LINK_CLICK would remove any accumulated interaction state but not close
the interaction.
Update the associated tests so that they correctly test the reduction of
this action.
Bug: T162924
Change-Id: Ia03e719c228ee96f279c1fa89252dc6b6371a8e9
... the interaction.
Following on from Iccba3c4c, LINK_CLICK shouldn't be considered the end
of an interaction because the link or preview can still be abandoned by
the user. Unlike ABANDON_END and LINK_DWELL, therefore, LINK_CLICK
musn't destroy the interaction but indicate that no more events should
be enqueued for the interaction.
More concretely, if the user has clicked the link or the preview, then
a "dwelledButAbandoned" or "dismissed" event shouldn't be logged.
Changes:
* Distinguish between "finalizing" and "closing" an interaction, where
the latter is the current behavior of ABANDON_END, LINK_DWELL, and
LINK_CLICK, in the eventLogging reducer and associated tests.
* If the interaction is finalized, then either the "dwelledButAbandoned"
or "dismissed" events shouldn't be logged.
Bug: T162924
Change-Id: I09d8776da992053f89a77508e29a7cde3cfeeac6
MediaWikiGadgetsDefinition does some basic gadget name sanitization
and we have to do the same when checking "is gadget enabled for user"
Changes:
- sanitize gadget name same way as
MediaWikiGadgetsDefinitionRepo::newFromDefinition() does.
- add try{} catch() when loading gadget as getGadget might throw an
exception
Bug: T160081
Change-Id: Ia7a57e9dcfa3b25129d6d2bf75795372fad2b251
As noted in T160406, the only QUnit tests that requires a running
MediaWiki instance is the test for mw.popups.processLinks. The function
itself is isolated from the rest of the codebase.
Now, as noted in T162876#3182198, during boot the
ext.eventLogging.Schema module is loaded asynchronously with
mw.loader.using. Since boot is unconditional and happens ASAP this
happens when the tests are loaded and run.
In the short term this can be avoided by not making the tests depend on
the entire codebase. The long term solution is laid out in T160406.
Supporting changes:
* Bundle assets with webpack@2.4.1.
Bug: T162876
Change-Id: If1ee1853ba7a9b2a66b24bb93b4e6062b92b0dba
... in the eventLogging reducer.
Like ABANDON_END, the LINK_CLICK should be considered the end of the
interaction in the context of the EventLogging instrumentation, i.e. no
events should be logged after the user clicks the preview or the link.
See T159490#3172692 for additional context.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: Iccba3c4c2b6121016ff7923c11b1622bc046ad6b
Like the FETCH_COMPLETE and ABANDON_END actions, the PREVIEW_SHOW action
was delayed but not conditionally reduced. As ABANDON_END is delayed,
there's a potential for a race and if ABANDON_END is reduced before
PREVIEW_SHOW, then there's no interaction to reduce the action into,
which causes an error, e.g. T159490#3165276 and T162373. Making
PREVIEW_SHOW require a token stops the error occurring in this scenario.
An alternative would be to clear the timeout created in
ext.popups.Preview#show in #hide. However, this would be inconsistent
with actions#fetch and actions#abandon.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: Ibd2c0c6f45e4392582cc6ed08517f6ca1146d57a
Mirroring all other actions that are dispatched after some delay, add
the token to the PREVIEW_SHOW action.
Supporting changes:
* Pass the token to ext.popups.Preview#show so that it can be passed to
actions#previewShow.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: I128fd56e770ed09d5d0dc55db73d11b013049c79
The ABANDON_START action test cases were (accidentally?) nested under
the FETCH_COMPLETE action test cases...
Bug: T162373
Change-Id: Ia7866178162512602dedd7f70d62c17995ee5076
... instead of using the active element.
In the case of the eventLogging reducer, this fixes scenario 4.1 from
T159490#3150331, which was caused by late FETCH_COMPLETE actions being
reduced regardless of whether interaction had been finalised or a new
interaction had started.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: If9d718625b0302ea2f75a778005643b4eef62bde
Treat these responses not as an API failure. Show a generic
preview whenever the server responds with a 404.
Bug: T160744
Change-Id: Id6169d9d4c7493f5b6511cc78fe65d448cdadc03
I6d9ff52b introduced a regression where if a logged out user clicks the
settings cog then an error is thrown.
For now, passing the event to the behavior for further processing is
required. However, it's clear that this makes the
ext.Popups.PreviewBehavior abstraction leaky.
Bug: T162324
Change-Id: I9dea04eb7435f9349e60d477f5701ec5dd655ebd
We have to be careful about the namespaces here, and then we don't
need the awful `.html( .html() )` hack. (I honestly have no idea
why that even worked for some browsers, it really shouldn't have.
The comment next to it is wrong.)
* Construct the 'svg:svg' element with the right namespace
* Set 'xlink:href' attribute on 'svg:image' element with the right namespace
Doing this correctly makes the thumbnails work in Opera 12, and it also
works as before in (at least) Chromium 57, Firefox 53, IE 11 and Edge.
I can't find out what version of Safari the other hack here was
supposed to apply to, but the code was wrong in both cases, and the
hack was mistakenly also applied to modern Chromium.
Useful resources for dealing with SVG embedded in HTML while scripting:
* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6701705/programmatically-creating-an-svg-image-element-with-javascript
* http://jsfiddle.net/UVFBj/8/
* https://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Href#xlink:href
Bug: T161799
Change-Id: I30b2a1291811296424018e013bd07055ae7551d7
Require that two promises are resolved (or one is rejected) before the
FETCH_COMPLETE action is dispatched. The first promise represents the
gateway request and the second represents an arbitrarily long delay. If
the first resolves before the second, then there'll be a delay until the
second resolves; whereas if the first rejects, then there's no delay.
Change-Id: I496fe317337745c593594efff26688c46d661bf3
The delay/timeout logic in actions#fetch will require more than one wait
call, for example.
Changes:
* Update the stub created in setupWait to store all deferred-promise
pairs and update the integration tests so that they don't use the stub
accidentally.
* Remove all references to the waitDeferred/waitPromise properties.
* Fix tests that relied on the waitDeferred/waitPromise properties being
available regardless of whether wait had been called.
* Update outdated or brittle - in the sense that it didn't reference
constants but their values - inline documentation.
Change-Id: I94345cdf4126b6c540d4fb8135a7a7e4d0507bed
Mixing in the delay was introduced in If3f1a06f so that the total RTT
for an API request could be calculated. Now that the FETCH_END action is
dispatched when the gateway request ends and not when the preview model
is resolved, this additional information (state) is redundant.
Change-Id: I7e6ffe0945ffedd9425525fa7da855e729d50b77
Ideally, the preview model is resolved after 500 ms, regardless of
whether the internal gateway takes 100 or 300 ms. Given this, there's an
important distinction to be made between the "fetch" ending and it
completing and their associated actions.
Changes:
* Dispatch the FETCH_COMPLETE action when the preview model is resolved.
* Update the reducers accordingly.
Change-Id: I62c9cb0430284b76338ea80bd170cac5af4be9d0
If the user has disabled PP via the settings dialog or they aren't in
the experimental condition, then link titles shouldn't be emptied.
Because this behavior has to respond to the user enabling/disabling PP
within the same page session, change the linkTitle change listener
rather than conditionally registering it.
Bug: T161277
Change-Id: I53c1a1d3e4436e2ffe08da27da388f394f4e8817
Binding the behavior to the preview before it's shown means that the
application will respond to user interactions with the preview even
though it's transparent.
This fixes scenario 4 from T159490.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: Ia2d06869868d07af60bdeb49d46612a4a0dc02e9
If the user abandons link A (or preview A) and immediately dwells on
link B, then log a "dismissed" or "dwelledButAbandoned" event.
In this context, "immediately" means before the ABANDON_END action is
dispatched, which, currently, is 300 ms after the ABANDON_START action
is dispatched.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: I49f0f5dfb3e6c08844f1794fee8cb6170e93981b
