Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sam Smith 0b2961c318 Merge mw.popups.experiment into mw.popups.core
ext.popups.experiment depends on .core as it initialized the mw.popups
namespace and .core depends on .experiments for
mw.popups#getEnabledState.

By merging the experiment module into core, we can eliminate any
circular dependencies.

Changes:
* Move ext.popups.experiment.js code into ext.popups.core.js
* Remove mw.popups.experiment module and any references to it

Note: ext.popups.experiment.test.js was left in its own file for cleaner
QUnit module setups and easier removal later. I'm not entirely happy
with doing it this way, but I'm not sure changing the mw.config within
the mw.popups.core QUnit module is worth merging the files.

Bug: T146035
Change-Id: I1f024567010acaa61c1d613c6e59c998198a5976
2016-09-21 16:43:49 -04:00
joakin 8f001ee4bd Respect beta feature flag for logged in users
Both in active and inactive state (not just active like before).

Bug: T146017
Change-Id: Ieb4cd39c2870fb701cabd0f1d01c0ab42b6ebe78
2016-09-20 17:48:39 +02:00
jdlrobson 765aa40cc1 Replace use of jStorage with mw.storage
Use the standardised MediaWiki storage system for the simple use
case of disabling/enabling Popups. The jStorage library is 12kb
uncompressed and cannot be justified for this usage (and if it becomes
the standardised library mw.storage will begin using it)

This means that browsers with full localStorage or no localStorage
support will not be able to disable Popups. Given the current ecosystem
of the web - localStorage is widely supported - and the fact that grade
A browsers enjoy localStorage support - this is not a problem.
See https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/REL1_27/resources/src/startup.js#L59

Changes:
* Stop using jStorage
* Cleanup and migrate previous values in jStorage with plan for removing this
in a month.

Bug: T136241
Change-Id: I6dac2911e84d6cb20731be34add01576cf407c46
2016-05-30 12:30:38 -07:00
Sam Smith c4667fd133 Convert isUserInCondition from async to sync
As there are an unmanageable amount of synchronous checks of
mw.popups.enabled, convert mw.popups.experiment.isUserInCondition to a
synchronous method.

Follow on I4959749.

Bug: T132604
Change-Id: Ide07e62868c77bfcd78af58dcec7303a35a72157
2016-05-19 14:06:17 -07:00
Sam Smith e9ddc8328d Handle user explicitly enabling/disabling feature
Follow on I4959749.

Bug: T132604
Change-Id: I4e6780f17b0423823295be9410a4343150e1e562
2016-05-19 19:10:53 +01:00
Sam Smith 3f03d681c9 Add ext.popups.experiment module
Changes:
* Add the ext.popups.experiment module
* Add the mw.popups.experiment.isUserInCondition function, which
  returns a promise that resolves with true if the user is in the
  experimental condition, otherwise false
* If the experiment isn't configured, i.e. wgPopupsExperimentConfig is
  null or undefined, then the user isn't entered into the experiment,
  providing a kill switch

Bug: T132604
Change-Id: I49597494273e3862711a32e4951c8598e6c8bf59
2016-05-18 17:28:46 +01:00