Per the Popups schema [0], the "dismissed" action expects the
perceivedWait property to be set.
Happily, the time until the preview was shown is already recorded and
used to determine whether or not to create a "dismissed" or
"dwelledButAbandoned" event.
Reducer changes:
* When creating the "dismissed" event, set the perceivedWait property to
the already accumulated timeToPreviewShow.
[0] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Schema:Popups
Bug: T164256
Change-Id: I3fd253f1c2ff5fa8e24c9225060d728ffd8dfd27
* Test for cases when a thumbnail won't be generated;
* Test thumbnail widths and heights;
* Test thumbnail coordinates.
Bug: T133022
Change-Id: I0f7d94816a2faab488b84f55b4462c8732d1031d
Since Ieea378c9 all QUnit tests are run in Node.js and not in the
browser. Tidy up references to QUnit inside of the codebase and tooling.
Changes:
* Don't exclude src/processLinks.js in Istanbul code coverage reports.
* Don't test for window.QUnit in createSchema. We no longer run the risk
of sending beacons while running the QUnit test suite as it's no
longer run in the browser.
Bug: T160406
Change-Id: Ifb6adb84b8019dd69231b50af00bf978b708fc60
The tests were removed in Iae0a78d0b8a13353de70794b67387f2c3bab44c6.
The ultimate goal is to refactor the renderer code and make it
testable, but before doing so we need to add tests to cover the existing
code. This will give us confidence that we won’t accidentally break
anything when we refactor.
Some of the tests have been removed as the functionality covered by
those were moved to model.js in I20f29657fcf94101a71ed13c0920508db71292ce.
Bug: T133022
Change-Id: I7b20324dd5fe8a428cdd96959b65bc82d44fb515
The ultimate goal is to refactor the renderer code and make it
testable, but before doing so we need to add tests to cover the existing
code. This will give us confidence that we won’t accidentally break
anything when we refactor.
Bug: T133022
Change-Id: I3ecbfb9bb3ac9c63fdd40df502796748c62949fe
The tests were removed in Iae0a78d0b8a13353de70794b67387f2c3bab44c6.
The ultimate goal is to refactor the renderer code and make it
testable, but before doing so we need to add tests to cover the existing
code. This will give us confidence that we won’t accidentally break
anything when we refactor.
Bug: T133022
Change-Id: I897276a1a953f6be62e4c2d4a24e0f22fc6ef141
With the final goal to remove the real mw stubs, move the processLinks
tests away from test cases, and split getTitle to be tested standalone.
Supporting changes:
* Move getTitle out to it's own module
* Will be tested separately in a followup commit
* Remove global declaration of mw.popups.processLinks (not needed any more)
Bug: T160406
Change-Id: Ieebd1257a2476081c67a318d3f05dffa1d3b9bdd
The eventLogging change listener is responsible for ensuring that the
internal state of Page Previews matches its external state (that
perceived by the user and UA). It does this by logging events with
ext.eventLog.Schema#log. This makes it the perfect place to track and
discard duplicate events enqueued by the Page Previews codebase observed
in T161769.
Make the change listener track events that it's logged by storing hashes
of the dynamic parts of them in memory. If the eventLogging change
listener sees the same event more than once, then it discards it and
increments a counter in StatsD.
This behaviour should be enabled for a matter of days as we should see
whether the duplicate events are being enqueued by the Page Previews
codebase immediately.
Bug: T163198
Change-Id: I6a38a2619d777a76dd45eb7300079e1f07b07b12
The statsv change listener depended on both the analytics tracking
function and whether it should log metrics to StatsD. We can simplify
the behaviour of the change listener by passing in a function which
doesn't log metrics to StatsD if such logging is disabled.
The change listener is now more isolated from other components.
Moreover, sharing the analytics tracking function with other components
is simpler as there's no repeated code.
Bug: T163198
Change-Id: Ibf4785fa4c27c1ad4739f02410f57412f56ff481
The setup and teardown hooks on QUnit.module are deprecated on the
latest versions.
See https://api.qunitjs.com/QUnit/module
mw-node-qunit supports them but we shouldn't be using them.
Bug: T160406
Change-Id: I32c07f22d01d16449a6e37f46ff20c577a1f14c6
Tests are basically unchanged, except for some stubs on beforeEach.
Supporting changes:
* Bring stubs from the mediawiki library for mw.Uri,
mw.Title.newFromText and mw.RegExp into stubs.js
* Remove hook onResourceLoaderTestModules given there are no resource
loader test modules after migrating processLinks.test.js
Why bring stubs from real source? This is not optimal. It could be the
case that the stubs would need to be updated at some point in the
future. That's why in the comment of each stub, it is specified where it
came from, and what was changed to make it work. It is not optimal but
it should help with a future update if necessary.
Also checked the history of the stubs and these three stubs are very
stable with a small commits per year, usually adding some extra
functionality (not breaking changes) (the rest of the commits are
docs/format stuff), so the core behavior that we rely on here shouldn't
change in a fundamental way. See the github links:
* https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/commits/master/resources/src/mediawiki/mediawiki.Uri.js
* https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/commits/master/resources/src/mediawiki/mediawiki.Title.js
* https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/commits/master/resources/src/mediawiki/mediawiki.RegExp.js
Right now this stubs allow us to bring the test to run in isolation in
node.
The initial plan was to do change the test to be less test-case oriented
with dependencies on mediawiki.*.js and not to bring fake "real" stubs,
but after looking into it, given that:
1. the test cases in the test seem pretty informative showing the kind
of links that popups accepts
2. the stubs are acceptably easy to bring in, and are pretty stable
I decided to go with this approach initially to finish the migration
without changing the meaning of the tests.
If we want to remove the stubs and morph the test to verify stub calls
and move the test cases to documentation on the source, I'll tackle that
on a future commit.
Bug: T160406
Change-Id: Ieea378c9b7fec9116222b4a099c226d1f1131f65
If the user dwells on a link for long enough, then the gateway makes a
request, which is allowed to complete regardless of whether or not the
response is required.
If the user abandons the link but the request completes before the
abandon completes - currently, ABANDON_END_DELAY is 300 ms - then the
preview will be rendered temporarily.
Fix this by not rendering the preview if the user has started to abandon
the link.
Bug: T163350
Change-Id: I154dde4e3ccaed3d11cb023c85c44451fc0ad957
If the user CmdOrCtrl+Clicks on a link, then the link will remain
focussed. If a preview is shown, clicks another element on the page, and
then there'll be no token to include in ABANDON_* with.
Bug: T162924
Change-Id: Ie2237aa55ea9a11070498b66c73b8bf1898d8d44
I09d8776 introduced a bug in the eventLogging reducer where reducing
LINK_CLICK would remove any accumulated interaction state but not close
the interaction.
Update the associated tests so that they correctly test the reduction of
this action.
Bug: T162924
Change-Id: Ia03e719c228ee96f279c1fa89252dc6b6371a8e9
... the interaction.
Following on from Iccba3c4c, LINK_CLICK shouldn't be considered the end
of an interaction because the link or preview can still be abandoned by
the user. Unlike ABANDON_END and LINK_DWELL, therefore, LINK_CLICK
musn't destroy the interaction but indicate that no more events should
be enqueued for the interaction.
More concretely, if the user has clicked the link or the preview, then
a "dwelledButAbandoned" or "dismissed" event shouldn't be logged.
Changes:
* Distinguish between "finalizing" and "closing" an interaction, where
the latter is the current behavior of ABANDON_END, LINK_DWELL, and
LINK_CLICK, in the eventLogging reducer and associated tests.
* If the interaction is finalized, then either the "dwelledButAbandoned"
or "dismissed" events shouldn't be logged.
Bug: T162924
Change-Id: I09d8776da992053f89a77508e29a7cde3cfeeac6
MediaWikiGadgetsDefinition does some basic gadget name sanitization
and we have to do the same when checking "is gadget enabled for user"
Changes:
- sanitize gadget name same way as
MediaWikiGadgetsDefinitionRepo::newFromDefinition() does.
- add try{} catch() when loading gadget as getGadget might throw an
exception
Bug: T160081
Change-Id: Ia7a57e9dcfa3b25129d6d2bf75795372fad2b251
... in the eventLogging reducer.
Like ABANDON_END, the LINK_CLICK should be considered the end of the
interaction in the context of the EventLogging instrumentation, i.e. no
events should be logged after the user clicks the preview or the link.
See T159490#3172692 for additional context.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: Iccba3c4c2b6121016ff7923c11b1622bc046ad6b
Like the FETCH_COMPLETE and ABANDON_END actions, the PREVIEW_SHOW action
was delayed but not conditionally reduced. As ABANDON_END is delayed,
there's a potential for a race and if ABANDON_END is reduced before
PREVIEW_SHOW, then there's no interaction to reduce the action into,
which causes an error, e.g. T159490#3165276 and T162373. Making
PREVIEW_SHOW require a token stops the error occurring in this scenario.
An alternative would be to clear the timeout created in
ext.popups.Preview#show in #hide. However, this would be inconsistent
with actions#fetch and actions#abandon.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: Ibd2c0c6f45e4392582cc6ed08517f6ca1146d57a
Mirroring all other actions that are dispatched after some delay, add
the token to the PREVIEW_SHOW action.
Supporting changes:
* Pass the token to ext.popups.Preview#show so that it can be passed to
actions#previewShow.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: I128fd56e770ed09d5d0dc55db73d11b013049c79
The ABANDON_START action test cases were (accidentally?) nested under
the FETCH_COMPLETE action test cases...
Bug: T162373
Change-Id: Ia7866178162512602dedd7f70d62c17995ee5076
... instead of using the active element.
In the case of the eventLogging reducer, this fixes scenario 4.1 from
T159490#3150331, which was caused by late FETCH_COMPLETE actions being
reduced regardless of whether interaction had been finalised or a new
interaction had started.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: If9d718625b0302ea2f75a778005643b4eef62bde
Treat these responses not as an API failure. Show a generic
preview whenever the server responds with a 404.
Bug: T160744
Change-Id: Id6169d9d4c7493f5b6511cc78fe65d448cdadc03
Require that two promises are resolved (or one is rejected) before the
FETCH_COMPLETE action is dispatched. The first promise represents the
gateway request and the second represents an arbitrarily long delay. If
the first resolves before the second, then there'll be a delay until the
second resolves; whereas if the first rejects, then there's no delay.
Change-Id: I496fe317337745c593594efff26688c46d661bf3
The delay/timeout logic in actions#fetch will require more than one wait
call, for example.
Changes:
* Update the stub created in setupWait to store all deferred-promise
pairs and update the integration tests so that they don't use the stub
accidentally.
* Remove all references to the waitDeferred/waitPromise properties.
* Fix tests that relied on the waitDeferred/waitPromise properties being
available regardless of whether wait had been called.
* Update outdated or brittle - in the sense that it didn't reference
constants but their values - inline documentation.
Change-Id: I94345cdf4126b6c540d4fb8135a7a7e4d0507bed
Mixing in the delay was introduced in If3f1a06f so that the total RTT
for an API request could be calculated. Now that the FETCH_END action is
dispatched when the gateway request ends and not when the preview model
is resolved, this additional information (state) is redundant.
Change-Id: I7e6ffe0945ffedd9425525fa7da855e729d50b77
Ideally, the preview model is resolved after 500 ms, regardless of
whether the internal gateway takes 100 or 300 ms. Given this, there's an
important distinction to be made between the "fetch" ending and it
completing and their associated actions.
Changes:
* Dispatch the FETCH_COMPLETE action when the preview model is resolved.
* Update the reducers accordingly.
Change-Id: I62c9cb0430284b76338ea80bd170cac5af4be9d0
If the user has disabled PP via the settings dialog or they aren't in
the experimental condition, then link titles shouldn't be emptied.
Because this behavior has to respond to the user enabling/disabling PP
within the same page session, change the linkTitle change listener
rather than conditionally registering it.
Bug: T161277
Change-Id: I53c1a1d3e4436e2ffe08da27da388f394f4e8817
If the user abandons link A (or preview A) and immediately dwells on
link B, then log a "dismissed" or "dwelledButAbandoned" event.
In this context, "immediately" means before the ABANDON_END action is
dispatched, which, currently, is 300 ms after the ABANDON_START action
is dispatched.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: I49f0f5dfb3e6c08844f1794fee8cb6170e93981b
Reducer changes:
* Add tests for ABANDON_END case.
* Extract the body of the ABANDON_END case into the createAbandonEvent
helper function.
Additional changes:
* totalInteractionProperty -> totalInteractionTime elsewhere in the same
file.
Bug: T159490
Change-Id: Ifff34271395f330b83cfe487e84800fe2d6f3811
