Page images was updated to have a split between the 'best' page
image, and the best free page image. Unfortunately the deployment
plan didn't take into account that the default 'free' would be
pointing to an unpopulated page prop, which will not be populated
until LinksUpdate has run for every page on every wiki which could
take weeks or months.
To restore some semblance of order, make the default point at the
currently populated field. A followup will need to be done to
populate the appropriate field.
Bug: T152155
Change-Id: I1d35e965dc37c8c4ecdcc43313b3198e951e1978
The API accepts a new query parameter `license`, whose
value can either be `free` or `any`. `free` is the default value.
When the value of `licence` is:
* `free`, then only the best image whose copyright allows
reusing it will be returned;
* `any`, then the best image, regardless of its copyright
status, will be returned.
Bug: T131105
Change-Id: I83ac5266e382d2d121aff3f7d28711787251c03b
This fixes a fatal which is blocking deployment of 1.29.0-wmf.1
refs T149059 fixes T149849
Bug: 149849
Change-Id: Ieb61585af3aa60b7af58597091151d0b494b2fd6
* Do not "return true" in hook handlers. I was told it's good practice
to either return false on failure, or nothing/null.
* Remove "static" from method that does not need to be static.
* Make some type hints more specific.
* Add missing imports. I wonder how this can work without the imports.
My PHPStorm complains.
Change-Id: Ia0e980ff99f0e004d700b22dd07ff17f04bed4ec
Fetch the extended metadata for every image, and if the NonFree key
(provided by CommonsMetadata) is present, rank down the image.
The check is run on LinksUpdate so changes to image copyright
templates won't have effect until the page is reparsed.
Unlike other weights, the work of extracting the weight factor from
the file/page is wholly done on LinksUpdate, instead of doing most
of it on parse and storing as ParserOutput extension metadata.
This is to avoid getting the article page parsing and the file
description page parsing conflicting with each other.
Bug: T124225
Change-Id: I21111ecbc80ded864806a2a93002f3254c3c68a9
User::getOption() already handles that, and this code bypassed the hook
in User::getDefaultOptions().
Change-Id: I41f9df177988dffd62de0060cb691a97161729e4
This patch only moves existing code around, but does not change any
implementation detail.
I found it very suprising that all code called by these two hook handlers
is 100% exclusive to these hook handlers. There is zero interaction
between these hook handlers code and all other code. Why is it in the
same file then? And why is it all static? It doesn't have to be. I
had to change literally nothing, except cutting and pasting, removing
all "static" and replacing all "self::..." with "$this->...". That's
all.
Change-Id: I7fdc582db425d3b95f7d02934b439eb9c102e712
This patch only moves existing code around, but does not change any
implementation detail.
I found it very suprising that all code called by this hook handler
is 100% exclusive to this hook handler. There is zero interaction
between this hook handlers code and all other code. Why is it in the
same file then? And why is it all static? It doesn't have to be. I
had to change literally nothing, except cutting and pasting, removing
all "static" and replacing all "self::..." with "$this->...". That's
all.
Change-Id: I5ffe6fdf4e57135e6f3b32636c80f22be758607c
