As a Wikimedia-deployed extension, we don't keep B/C for older MW branches,
instead people should use the release branches.
Change-Id: I8b8e554a8a8663c19ce3ea52f047c8d40537b042
In ApiQueryGadgetCategories.php for function getList() I've added inline comment for ignoring this rule, because is unclear why it throws this error.
Change-Id: I74c4a6c75f48b8f7a237396666db3b37993c300d
The wrapper tags that we have to create when using the 'rawrow' option
would have to be different for OOUI and non-OOUI preferences forms,
making it impossible to support both at the same time.
We used it in order to generate `<td colspan=2>...</td>` rather than
`<td></td><td>...</td>`, and make the description span both the label
and the input columns. However, this is not necessary, because the
label column is entirely hidden on this page of preferences, as all of
the preferences have no labels.
Bug: T203202
Change-Id: Ib9510a8bfb2430fdda3988d88628c9f0c509c6d0
* "raw" and "rawrow" are documented as booleans.
* "raw" does not have any effect if "rawrow" is set.
* "label" does not have any effect if "rawrow" is set.
* "noglobal" refers to GlobalPreferences. It does not have any effect
because "info" fields are blacklisted anyway.
https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-GlobalPreferences/blob/master/includes/GlobalPreferencesFactory.php#L75
Also see my longer comment in I1ab2bc6 where I explain all these changes.
Change-Id: I7b4e08b45070ae07935e1cd59091b3d608583e5b
The user's preference usually reflects the displayed skin, however this isn't
true if the `useskin` URL query is set, or MobileFrontend is being used.
This fixes gadgets being displayed on the wrong skin when using `useskin`,
and allows mobile-specific gadgets (using `skins=minerva`).
Testing if the gadget is allowed in the current skin is split out from
`isAllowed` to `isSkinSupported` to enable a future patch showing gadgets
on preferences regardless of if they are allowed on the current skin.
Test coverage is added for both functions.
Also fixed another test which wasn't working, presumably because the placeholder
user didn't have the "read" right, so the section wasn't being kept.
Bug: T199478
Change-Id: I21febe92d54d6d0b89925f902581cc2739d824fb
