Links the following entries in gadget definitions to the associated page:
- scripts
- styles
- datas
- peers
- dependencies (only when they are also a gadget)
- category (links to MW message page)
- messages
unserialize(serialize()) hack is a bit ugly, but it works.
Co-Authored-By: Siddharth VP <siddharthvp@gmail.com>
Bug: T298844
Change-Id: I9154f600997fe693410e7560ed30732102b806aa
Allow specifying page actions ('view', 'edit', 'history', etc) in
gadget definitions. If specified, the gadget is run only on the given
page action(s).
This is especially useful for default gadgets like RefToolbar[1] and
TextReactions[2] that only need to be loaded while editing.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:RefToolbar
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Text_reactions
Bug: T204201
Bug: T63007
Change-Id: Idde71b3f1f6c36cd21539a2312be8f12217a9acc
The parsed content of JSON files in the gadget is made available from the
gadget's JS files via require(). That is, MediaWiki:Gadget-data.json (or
Gadget:data.json) is available as `require('./data.json')`. This is
supported for both MediaWikiGadgetsDefinitionRepo and
GadgetDefinitionNamespaceRepo. The JSON parsing is done server-side.
JSON can only be used in "package" gadgets - in which the JS files can
also be invoked via require().
Also added a test for GadgetResourceLoaderModule.
Bug: T198758
Depends-On: Ib4556d09c4d393269e32771aab00f59a5f630e1b
Depends-On: Id4589a597ccfc4266b3e63d10f75b146aa7a287a
Change-Id: I21acb46cdd244a39b5cc6963aa763f0113bd1e38
Use it instead of Content::getDeletionUpdates and Content::getSecondaryDataUpdates.
Bug: T285730
Bug: T285729
Change-Id: Ie4ea0917f120809be59e2b7afad51cd189d64dd1
Additional changes:
* Added .eslintcache to .gitignore.
Add an explicit check before using the parameter.
Depends-On: I92ecaa9c14e5c8ba32d152a9e2246a2144b1c7da
Change-Id: I255237574e76f1c0d92f376bc8cbb81f7cb4ed14
DataUpdate is a specific implementation (currently the only one), while
DeferrableUpdate is the interface. Binding against the interface is
enough, and what the base classes already do.
I'm also removing a line of meaningless documentation. "Creates an
instance of this class" is a general description that is true for all
constructors.
Change-Id: Ia6dc86b078628db5e0ab68ef46bf0396567b767c
Depending on GadgetRepo::singleton() to return a specific implementation
is fragile. Pass each created/updated/deleted page to
GadgetRepo::handlePageCreation/Update/Deletion() and let each specific
implementation deal with it.
Use LinkTarget to be TitleValue compatible for the future.
Change-Id: Ibe2e26d12369a897c53757adf621926f62af7f7b
Ref discussion on T42284.
Test plan:
* Create gadget A with a .css file only. (Maybe mark as 'hidden')
* Create gadget B with .js file, and peers=A.
* Verify that enabling B will result in B being loaded as general module,
and A being loaded as page style module.
Change-Id: Ib6207e72c576ff387ecdba685a063bdfbb828199
T87871 formally introduced the concept of a styles module,
which sets mw.loader.state to "ready" when loaded through addModuleStyles().
Previously, addModuleStyles couldn't safely do that because a module may
contain scripts also, in which case mw.loader must still load the (rest)
of the module (causes styles to load twice).
In MediaWiki core or extensions this is easily avoided by calling not
calling both addModules() and addModuleStyles().
For Gadgets we call both as a workaround to allow users to provide styles
(without a FOUC), but also to provide scripts+styles. Since we don't declare
which one is intended (and some gadgets do both), we loaded them both ways.
This will no longer be allowed in the future (see T92459).
The new 'type=styles' Gadget attribute promises to ResourceLoader that a
gadget only contains styles.
Impact:
* [Bug fix] When mw.loader requires a styles module that already loaded,
it will not load again.
* [Feature] It is possible for a general scripts+styles gadget to depend on
a styles gadget. Previously this caused the styles to load twice.
* Specifying type=styles will load the module through addModuleStyles() only.
Use this for modules that contain styles that relate to elements already
on the page (e.g. when customising the skin, layout, or article content).
* Specifying type=general will load the module through addModules() only.
Use this if your module contains both scripts and styles and the styles
only relate to elements created by the script. This means the styles do not
need to be loaded separately through addModuleStyles() and will not apply
to noscript mode.
Effective difference:
* Gadgets with only styles: We assume type=styles.
This fixes the main bug (styles loading twice) and requires no migration!
* Gadgets with only scripts: We assume type=general.
This requires no migration! (And: No more empty stylesheet request)
* Gadgets with scripts (with or without styles): We assume type=general, but
unless type=general was explicitly set we'll still load it both ways so
that the styles apply directly on page load.
If this is not needed, set type=general.
If this is needed, it should become two separate modules. We do not support
a single module having two purposes (1: apply styles to the page,
2: provide scripts+styles). The styles module should be separate.
It can be made hidden, and listed as dependency of the other module.
The latter case is detected on page load and results in a console warning
with a link to T42284.
Bug: T42284
Bug: T92459
Change-Id: Ia3c9ddee243f710022144fc2884434350695699a
For consistency with rest of MediaWiki, especially CodeEditor.
Note that this will cause dirty diffs for any definition pages created
before this patch, but that's not a big deal.
Change-Id: I3ed4b4aa7d18c489b9a322f67ea6ea31e610a257
Implements:
* Gadget definition content and content handler
* Basic validation for gadget definition content
* GadgetDefinitionNamespace implementation of GadgetRepo
* DataUpdates upon editing/deletion of Gadget definition pages
* EditFilterMerged hook for improved error messages
* 'GadgetsRepoClass' option to switch GadgetRepo implementation used
* Lazy-load the GadgetResourceLoaderModule class so we don't need to
load each individual gadget object unless its needed
Note that Special:Gadgets's export feature intentionally doesn't work
yet, and will be fixed in a follow up patch.
Bug: T106177
Change-Id: Ib11db5fb0f7b46793bfa956cf1367f1dc1059b1c
