This gives each section and each gadget's entry an `id` attribute,
which can be used for linking, as requested in T126962. Existing user
options still match the new preferences.
It also probably makes future improvements easier. No one understands
multiselects with subsections.
Bug: T126962
Change-Id: Ifaca96e288c475017636c2408712d6a20aa77da9
Multiselect can build by message keys only and allows to parse them.
This reverts fix for T32182, there is no way to handle the dir on each
item/checkbox at the moment
Reintroduce Iccd6202c443bd699aa3a911c8ba36a2b7bcdcfed (reverted by
I1cf3c7c61e9e90567587350639590691add1af34)
Bug: T58633
Bug: T278650
Depends-On: I8f52f21ae2641ddcad1aa85ce6bf14de1a09ab4b
Change-Id: If71008195f58faff9f302f7ea2bf9dbb1a527844
Multiselect can build by message keys only
This reverts fix for T32182, there is no way to handle the dir on each
item/checkbox at the moment
Bug: T58633
Bug: T278650
Depends-On: Ie983757081dc39f3685ba5b01b02bd124880e1af
Change-Id: Iccd6202c443bd699aa3a911c8ba36a2b7bcdcfed
The following sniffs are failing and were disabled:
* MediaWiki.Commenting.FunctionComment.MissingDocumentationPrivate
Additional changes:
* Also sorted "composer fix" command to run phpcbf last.
Change-Id: I5fa8001a2ea7fdab2dbf9ce8cba9d1764f7a4562
The user's preference usually reflects the displayed skin, however this isn't
true if the `useskin` URL query is set, or MobileFrontend is being used.
This fixes gadgets being displayed on the wrong skin when using `useskin`,
and allows mobile-specific gadgets (using `skins=minerva`).
Testing if the gadget is allowed in the current skin is split out from
`isAllowed` to `isSkinSupported` to enable a future patch showing gadgets
on preferences regardless of if they are allowed on the current skin.
Test coverage is added for both functions.
Also fixed another test which wasn't working, presumably because the placeholder
user didn't have the "read" right, so the section wasn't being kept.
Bug: T199478
Change-Id: I21febe92d54d6d0b89925f902581cc2739d824fb
This is more an integration test than anything. The @covers tags I found
are to strict, in my opinion. These test cases cover more code.
Change-Id: I6cef7ce0c612ac3dfbb855c495032df1fe96f4af
… as well as update a line of documentation I had stashed. I think this
does not need it's own patch, or does it?
Change-Id: I99eee1f7b5ec96c1c75e73d66200bc41807452fa
Follows-up 152484566, which added support for it in Gadgets 2.0, but
it's easy enough to make it work in existing definitions as well.
That way, people can stop using 'rights=hidden' hacks.
Bug: T33150
Change-Id: Idd6944a9ad38279e117c1a02a4b5fd0343455ba0
T87871 formally introduced the concept of a styles module,
which sets mw.loader.state to "ready" when loaded through addModuleStyles().
Previously, addModuleStyles couldn't safely do that because a module may
contain scripts also, in which case mw.loader must still load the (rest)
of the module (causes styles to load twice).
In MediaWiki core or extensions this is easily avoided by calling not
calling both addModules() and addModuleStyles().
For Gadgets we call both as a workaround to allow users to provide styles
(without a FOUC), but also to provide scripts+styles. Since we don't declare
which one is intended (and some gadgets do both), we loaded them both ways.
This will no longer be allowed in the future (see T92459).
The new 'type=styles' Gadget attribute promises to ResourceLoader that a
gadget only contains styles.
Impact:
* [Bug fix] When mw.loader requires a styles module that already loaded,
it will not load again.
* [Feature] It is possible for a general scripts+styles gadget to depend on
a styles gadget. Previously this caused the styles to load twice.
* Specifying type=styles will load the module through addModuleStyles() only.
Use this for modules that contain styles that relate to elements already
on the page (e.g. when customising the skin, layout, or article content).
* Specifying type=general will load the module through addModules() only.
Use this if your module contains both scripts and styles and the styles
only relate to elements created by the script. This means the styles do not
need to be loaded separately through addModuleStyles() and will not apply
to noscript mode.
Effective difference:
* Gadgets with only styles: We assume type=styles.
This fixes the main bug (styles loading twice) and requires no migration!
* Gadgets with only scripts: We assume type=general.
This requires no migration! (And: No more empty stylesheet request)
* Gadgets with scripts (with or without styles): We assume type=general, but
unless type=general was explicitly set we'll still load it both ways so
that the styles apply directly on page load.
If this is not needed, set type=general.
If this is needed, it should become two separate modules. We do not support
a single module having two purposes (1: apply styles to the page,
2: provide scripts+styles). The styles module should be separate.
It can be made hidden, and listed as dependency of the other module.
The latter case is detected on page load and results in a console warning
with a link to T42284.
Bug: T42284
Bug: T92459
Change-Id: Ia3c9ddee243f710022144fc2884434350695699a
