It wasn't meant to be there, and flow-mention doesn't have it either.
We also don't have any other notification types with
three prioritized secondary links.
Bug: T125949
Change-Id: Icbffa185b1116b1a6beb9bb3585339fdf7e82cdd
The approach here is to use $msg->escaped() to
remove all markup and then replace new lines
with a single space.
Bug: T128062
Change-Id: I1d5a6e57fbae9b6a441671beff1c60720b9445d5
Some notifications return relative urls in their
primary or secondary links. This change makes those
urls absolute so they point to the right wiki
when viewed from another wiki (cross-wiki notifications).
Bug: T125738
Bug: T127697
Change-Id: Ib65337430eb2484f9491668a9998deef70589fb1
It used to be like this, but in order to get the messages badge to show
in the correct circumstances, I had to know if the user had ever had
foreign messages before & I also needed euw_messages_ts even if those
messages had already been read.
Now that we're unconditionally showing messages, we no longer need these
0-value rows.
Bug: T127731
Change-Id: I1fc13bf0e5133ae39224f66d1b5a59c769bfcee2
Current situation: cross-wiki can be enabled on certain wikis &
disabled on others.
Code used to check if cross-wiki was enabled before fetching the
status of unread messages on foreign wikis. However, it would then
write that result to a shared memcached key.
The cross-wiki check should not happen before data is stored to
cache: what is stored should always be for all wikis. Only when
we fetch it, should we check if cross-wiki is enabled. And if it's
not, we can't use the cross-wiki data - we have to hack around it
ourselves...
Bug: T124372
Change-Id: I3d3d54fc3cbfbf73b51e97acfd8d355dd0cea36d
when the subject line is left with the default
generated value, we take the begining of the
email content to add a preview in the
notification.
Bug: T121831
Change-Id: Ib7c646f6709c7100ef51186f84fe14807d6a211a
Objects can be different instances (and for User, they can contain
very different data) in which case they wouldn't be recognized even
if they were the same user.
Let's find by ID instead.
Bug: T124803
Change-Id: Ia166fd4190f264354cea83d98047c62c7e0714ea
This code is completely useless:
* for format=flyout, the new EchoFlyoutFormatter.php will be run
* and even that one has already been deprecated as it was replaced
by format=model (flyout html is now built in client)
Change-Id: Iea23abb66397ecc4efb575fe33fdbedc5b4e0f70
The existing "html" formatter was used for the special page & is now
superseeded by the new-style "special" formatter. Previous "html"
notifications are no longer used & could even be broken.
Instead of keeping the old "html" formatter around, we should let it
use the new formatter (and eventually just kill that redundant format
in the API)
Change-Id: Ibbd40aafa9eee718b196ad62f6edc99629b263b4
We now have 'special' in $formatters, there's no need to keep
the mapping to the legacy formatter around.
Change-Id: I66f330e8c84a50858658361caef521a3e5717d58
Right now, if certain users should be excluded, that would have
to be part of the user-locators already. This is annoying because
it's hard to write "generic" user locators when you want to exclude
just a couple of people in certain cases.
In Flow, for example, we have user-locators for users watching a
board or topic. We don't want to send the notification to people
that have also been mentioned in that post (they'll get a separate
notification). We could build that exception into those
user-locators, but then we couldn't re-use them in other places...
This basically means we couldn't use EchoUserLocator::locateUsersWatchingTitle,
we would have to roll our own that also excludes mentioned users.
Instead, this lets you add 'user-filters' (that functionality
actually exists already, but is not currently exposed), which
lists users to not send the notification to, even though they could
be in a user-locator.
Bug: T125428
Change-Id: Ifa0e2d3283f57624af4c5ec264f9f66223508e83
