The fade in/out animation is asynchronous. This means that if we are
sorting multiple items one after the other, by the time the item faded
out, it will be reinserted back into the wrong position, breaking the
sorting.
This also broke the promise of OO.SortedEmitterList whereby all its items
are always in order.
The way to fix this was to force a better synchronization with the item
order while we hide and show the item in its new place. To do that,
a new widget is created as a fake clone of the old one, in the original
position of the old one. The original item is then reinserted (while hidden)
to the proper location -- preserving order. The fake clone is then faded
out, and the real item is then faded in.
For this to work properly, the cloned item had to preserve some of the
original item's information, like timestamp, foreigness and id. However,
since both the real item and the fake new clone have the same details,
the clone fakes its ID by adding a fraction to it - promising that the
fallback in case of equal timestamps (which happens on the real and
cloned items) will still resolve with some decision about the placement
of the items rather than (falsely but understandably) decide they are
both the same.
Since this whole animation is somewhat of a hack, the list now has a
configuration parameter to turn the animation on.
The animation is on in the popups, but off in the special page.
Bug: T141419
Change-Id: Ic7c35e5ddefc51bf7fde497eab36414b4dddcd9e
Add a global-wiki 'mark all as read' to the Special:Notifications page.
The 'mark all as read' will makr all notifications in the given
wiki. The context of the wiki changes when filters are chosen,
and so the message of the button changes as well.
Bug: T115528
Change-Id: Ibd9dcdf7072d6cbc1a268c18e558e6d0df28f929
When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread')
the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when
the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the
system should remove these items from view when the action is taken.
In this commit:
* The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when
read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set.
* We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to
make sure we have consistency in the code.
* Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy;
meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist
emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits
'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This
means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with
a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional
'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while
resorting happens.
* The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed
so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an
entire batch of items if needed.
* The pagination model now updates the count for the current page
rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also
updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an
accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that
are displayed.
Bug: T136891
Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
This organizes the operation of seenTime so we can store and
follow up on it based on different sources, as well as update
it correctly remotely when needed.
Change-Id: I629ecfc84999be998b45c9c7adb00ea7e3e51742
This will allow us to let the user click filters quickly, effectively
changing the promises sent to the API, but let the API only resolve
with the latest requested promise.
Bug: T136895
Change-Id: I698a2b8eced6d8ee997efef353697d27d92cfb2f
Add a sidebar with cross-wiki sources and pages of unread notifications.
The filter allows the user to fetch notifications from a foreign source
and specific pages if those exist.
Bug: T129366
Change-Id: I57d827a47f80274d75364c2099a9624049a26834
The zero results can either be because there are no notifications
at all for this user in the local wiki, or because there are no
results for the specific filter. Both messages are used for either
case.
Also, clean up the display of push/pop pending for the inbox widget
and hide the label in case the message count is 0 or 1 notifications
as it is unhelpful and irrelevant in these cases.
Bug: T136586
Bug: T136574
Bug: T129363
Change-Id: I1465f772bb9f5247df645d6612f951e5fd7d38cf
Add a pagination widget with events and separate the logic for
organization. Let the widget listen to events from the pagination
model so it always keeps itself updated.
Change-Id: Id1df112cbb0d90195217e88fbee97a59170b99c5
Change the pending element to be the notifications list rather than
the whole inbox widget in the Special:Notifications page.
Bug: T136581
Change-Id: I82b073c9cd628f30c13305510d6604e3ef636c2a
