mediawiki-extensions-Echo/modules/ui/mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget.js

175 lines
4.6 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

( function ( $, mw ) {
/**
* A notifications list organized and separated by dates
*
* @class
* @extends OO.ui.Widget
* @mixins OO.ui.mixin.PendingElement
*
* @constructor
* @param {mw.echo.Controller} controller Echo controller
* @param {mw.echo.dm.ModelManager} modelManager Model manager
* @param {Object} [config] Configuration object
Fix fade-in/out animation in sorting The fade in/out animation is asynchronous. This means that if we are sorting multiple items one after the other, by the time the item faded out, it will be reinserted back into the wrong position, breaking the sorting. This also broke the promise of OO.SortedEmitterList whereby all its items are always in order. The way to fix this was to force a better synchronization with the item order while we hide and show the item in its new place. To do that, a new widget is created as a fake clone of the old one, in the original position of the old one. The original item is then reinserted (while hidden) to the proper location -- preserving order. The fake clone is then faded out, and the real item is then faded in. For this to work properly, the cloned item had to preserve some of the original item's information, like timestamp, foreigness and id. However, since both the real item and the fake new clone have the same details, the clone fakes its ID by adding a fraction to it - promising that the fallback in case of equal timestamps (which happens on the real and cloned items) will still resolve with some decision about the placement of the items rather than (falsely but understandably) decide they are both the same. Since this whole animation is somewhat of a hack, the list now has a configuration parameter to turn the animation on. The animation is on in the popups, but off in the special page. Bug: T141419 Change-Id: Ic7c35e5ddefc51bf7fde497eab36414b4dddcd9e
2016-07-29 23:35:29 +00:00
* @cfg {boolean} [animateSorting=false] Animate the sorting of items
* @cfg {jQuery} [$overlay] An overlay for the popup menus
*/
mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget = function MwEchoUiDatedNotificationsListWidget( controller, modelManager, config ) {
config = config || {};
// Parent constructor
mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget.parent.call( this, config );
// Mixin constructors
OO.ui.mixin.PendingElement.call( this, config );
this.manager = modelManager;
this.controller = controller;
this.models = {};
this.$overlay = config.$overlay || this.$element;
Fix fade-in/out animation in sorting The fade in/out animation is asynchronous. This means that if we are sorting multiple items one after the other, by the time the item faded out, it will be reinserted back into the wrong position, breaking the sorting. This also broke the promise of OO.SortedEmitterList whereby all its items are always in order. The way to fix this was to force a better synchronization with the item order while we hide and show the item in its new place. To do that, a new widget is created as a fake clone of the old one, in the original position of the old one. The original item is then reinserted (while hidden) to the proper location -- preserving order. The fake clone is then faded out, and the real item is then faded in. For this to work properly, the cloned item had to preserve some of the original item's information, like timestamp, foreigness and id. However, since both the real item and the fake new clone have the same details, the clone fakes its ID by adding a fraction to it - promising that the fallback in case of equal timestamps (which happens on the real and cloned items) will still resolve with some decision about the placement of the items rather than (falsely but understandably) decide they are both the same. Since this whole animation is somewhat of a hack, the list now has a configuration parameter to turn the animation on. The animation is on in the popups, but off in the special page. Bug: T141419 Change-Id: Ic7c35e5ddefc51bf7fde497eab36414b4dddcd9e
2016-07-29 23:35:29 +00:00
this.animateSorting = !!config.animateSorting;
this.listWidget = new mw.echo.ui.SortedListWidget(
// Sorting callback
function ( a, b ) {
// Reverse sorting
if ( b.getTimestamp() < a.getTimestamp() ) {
return -1;
} else if ( b.getTimestamp() > a.getTimestamp() ) {
return 1;
}
},
// Config
{
classes: [ 'mw-echo-ui-datedNotificationsWidget-group' ],
Fix fade-in/out animation in sorting The fade in/out animation is asynchronous. This means that if we are sorting multiple items one after the other, by the time the item faded out, it will be reinserted back into the wrong position, breaking the sorting. This also broke the promise of OO.SortedEmitterList whereby all its items are always in order. The way to fix this was to force a better synchronization with the item order while we hide and show the item in its new place. To do that, a new widget is created as a fake clone of the old one, in the original position of the old one. The original item is then reinserted (while hidden) to the proper location -- preserving order. The fake clone is then faded out, and the real item is then faded in. For this to work properly, the cloned item had to preserve some of the original item's information, like timestamp, foreigness and id. However, since both the real item and the fake new clone have the same details, the clone fakes its ID by adding a fraction to it - promising that the fallback in case of equal timestamps (which happens on the real and cloned items) will still resolve with some decision about the placement of the items rather than (falsely but understandably) decide they are both the same. Since this whole animation is somewhat of a hack, the list now has a configuration parameter to turn the animation on. The animation is on in the popups, but off in the special page. Bug: T141419 Change-Id: Ic7c35e5ddefc51bf7fde497eab36414b4dddcd9e
2016-07-29 23:35:29 +00:00
$overlay: this.$overlay,
animated: false
}
);
// Events
this.manager.connect( this, {
update: 'populateFromModel',
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
discard: 'onManagerDiscardModel'
} );
this.$element
.addClass( 'mw-echo-ui-datedNotificationsWidget' )
.append( this.listWidget.$element );
// Initialization
this.populateFromModel();
};
/* Initialization */
OO.inheritClass( mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget, OO.ui.Widget );
OO.mixinClass( mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget, OO.ui.mixin.PendingElement );
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget.prototype.onManagerDiscardModel = function ( modelId ) {
var group,
model = this.models[ modelId ],
list = this.getList();
if ( model ) {
group = list.getItemFromId( model.getName() );
list.removeItems( [ group ] );
}
};
/**
* Respond to model removing source group
*
* @param {string} source Symbolic name of the source group
*/
mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget.prototype.onModelRemoveSource = function ( source ) {
var list = this.getList(),
group = list.getItemFromId( source );
list.removeItems( [ group ] );
};
/**
* Respond to model manager update event.
* This event means we are repopulating the entire list and the
* associated models within it.
*
* @param {Object} models List models, indexed by ID
*/
mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget.prototype.populateFromModel = function ( models ) {
var modelId, model, subgroupWidget,
groupWidgets = [];
// Detach all attached models
for ( modelId in this.models ) {
this.detachModel( modelId );
}
for ( model in models ) {
// Create SubGroup widgets
subgroupWidget = new mw.echo.ui.DatedSubGroupListWidget(
this.controller,
models[ model ],
{
showTitle: true,
showMarkAllRead: true,
Fix fade-in/out animation in sorting The fade in/out animation is asynchronous. This means that if we are sorting multiple items one after the other, by the time the item faded out, it will be reinserted back into the wrong position, breaking the sorting. This also broke the promise of OO.SortedEmitterList whereby all its items are always in order. The way to fix this was to force a better synchronization with the item order while we hide and show the item in its new place. To do that, a new widget is created as a fake clone of the old one, in the original position of the old one. The original item is then reinserted (while hidden) to the proper location -- preserving order. The fake clone is then faded out, and the real item is then faded in. For this to work properly, the cloned item had to preserve some of the original item's information, like timestamp, foreigness and id. However, since both the real item and the fake new clone have the same details, the clone fakes its ID by adding a fraction to it - promising that the fallback in case of equal timestamps (which happens on the real and cloned items) will still resolve with some decision about the placement of the items rather than (falsely but understandably) decide they are both the same. Since this whole animation is somewhat of a hack, the list now has a configuration parameter to turn the animation on. The animation is on in the popups, but off in the special page. Bug: T141419 Change-Id: Ic7c35e5ddefc51bf7fde497eab36414b4dddcd9e
2016-07-29 23:35:29 +00:00
$overlay: this.$overlay,
animated: this.animateSorting
}
);
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
this.attachModel( model, models[ model ] );
subgroupWidget.resetItemsFromModel();
groupWidgets.push( subgroupWidget );
}
// Reset the list and re-add the items
this.getList().clearItems();
this.getList().addItems( groupWidgets );
};
/**
* Attach a model to the widget
*
* @param {string} modelId Symbolic name for the model
* @param {mw.echo.dm.SortedList} model Notifications list model
*/
mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget.prototype.attachModel = function ( modelId, model ) {
this.models[ modelId ] = model;
};
/**
* Detach a model from the widget
*
* @param {string} modelId Notifications list model
*/
mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget.prototype.detachModel = function ( modelId ) {
this.models[ modelId ].disconnect( this );
delete this.models[ modelId ];
};
/**
* Get the list widget contained in this item
*
* @return {mw.echo.ui.SortedListWidget} List widget
*/
mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget.prototype.getList = function () {
return this.listWidget;
};
/**
* Get the number of all notifications in all sections of the widget
*
* @return {number} The number of all notifications
*/
mw.echo.ui.DatedNotificationsWidget.prototype.getAllNotificationCount = function () {
var i,
count = 0,
groups = this.getList().getItems();
for ( i = 0; i < groups.length; i++ ) {
count += groups[ i ].getListWidget().getItemCount();
}
return count;
};
}( jQuery, mediaWiki ) );