mediawiki-extensions-Echo/modules/model/mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList.js

164 lines
4.5 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

( function () {
/**
* Notification groups list data structure.
* It contains mw.echo.dm.NotificationsList items
*
* This contains a list of grouped notifications by source, and
* serves as a list of lists for cross-wiki notifications based
* on their remote sources and/or wikis.
*
* @class
* @extends mw.echo.dm.SortedList
*
* @constructor
* @param {Object} [config] Configuration options
* @cfg {boolean} [foreign] The list contains foreign notifications
*/
mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList = function MwEchoDmNotificationGroupsList( config ) {
config = config || {};
// Parent constructor
mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList.super.call( this );
// Sorting callback
this.setSortingCallback( function ( a, b ) {
// Reverse sorting
if ( b.getTimestamp() < a.getTimestamp() ) {
return -1;
} else if ( b.getTimestamp() > a.getTimestamp() ) {
return 1;
}
// Fallback on Source
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
return b.getName() - a.getName();
} );
this.foreign = !!config.foreign;
this.groups = {};
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
this.aggregate( { discard: 'groupDiscardItem' } );
this.connect( this, { groupDiscardItem: 'onGroupDiscardItem' } );
};
/* Initialization */
OO.inheritClass( mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList, mw.echo.dm.SortedList );
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
/* Events */
/**
* A group was permanently removed
*
* @event mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList#discard
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
*/
/* Methods */
/**
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
* Handle a discard event from any list.
* This means that one of the sources has discarded an item.
*
* @param {mw.echo.dm.NotificationsList} groupList List source model for the item
*/
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList.prototype.onGroupDiscardItem = function ( groupList ) {
// Check if the list has anything at all
if ( groupList.isEmpty() ) {
// Remove it
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
this.removeGroup( groupList.getName() );
}
};
/**
* Add a group to the list. This is a more convenient alias to using
* addItems()
*
* @param {string} groupSource Symbolic name for the source of
* this group, to be recognized for API operations
* @param {Object} sourceData Source data
* @param {mw.echo.dm.NotificationItem[]} [groupItems] Optional items to add to this group
*/
mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList.prototype.addGroup = function ( groupSource, sourceData, groupItems ) {
var groupListModel = new mw.echo.dm.NotificationsList( {
title: sourceData.title,
name: groupSource,
source: groupSource,
sourceURL: sourceData.base,
timestamp: sourceData.ts
} );
if ( Array.isArray( groupItems ) && groupItems.length > 0 ) {
groupListModel.addItems( groupItems );
}
// Add the group
this.addItems( [ groupListModel ] );
};
/**
* Get the timestamp of the list by taking the latest list's
* timestamp.
*
* @return {string} Latest timestamp
*/
mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList.prototype.getTimestamp = function () {
var items = this.getItems();
return (
items.length > 0 ?
items[ 0 ].getTimestamp() :
0
);
};
/**
* Add items to a specific group by its source identifier.
*
* @param {string} groupSource Source identifier of the group
* @param {mw.echo.dm.NotificationItem[]} groupItems Items to add to this group
*/
mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList.prototype.addItemsToGroup = function ( groupSource, groupItems ) {
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
var group = this.getGroupByName( groupSource );
if ( group ) {
group.addItems( groupItems );
}
};
/**
* Remove a group from the list. This is an easier to use alias
* to 'removeItems()' method.
*
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
* Since this is an intentional action, we fire 'discard' event.
* The main reason for this is that the event 'remove' is a general
* event that is fired both when a user intends on removing an
* item and also when an item is temporarily removed to be re-added
* for the sake of sorting. To avoid ambiguity, we use 'discard' event.
*
* @param {string} groupName Group name
* @fires mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList#discard
*/
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList.prototype.removeGroup = function ( groupName ) {
var group = this.getGroupByName( groupName );
if ( group ) {
this.removeItems( group );
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
this.emit( 'discard', group );
}
};
/**
* Get a group by its source identifier.
*
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
* @param {string} groupName Group name
* @return {mw.echo.dm.NotificationsList|null} Requested group, null if none was found.
*/
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
mw.echo.dm.NotificationGroupsList.prototype.getGroupByName = function ( groupName ) {
var items = this.getItems();
for ( var i = 0; i < items.length; i++ ) {
Relate read-state filter and mark read/unread action When we are viewing a certain read state filter ('read' or 'unread') the visibility of items should correspond to that state even when the user marks a specific item as read/unread. That means that the system should remove these items from view when the action is taken. In this commit: * The controller makes the judgment of whether to remove items when read/unread action is taken, based on whether a filter is set. * We clean up the terminology of discard - no more 'remove' - to make sure we have consistency in the code. * Related: The 'discard' event is now scoped within the hierarchy; meaning, lists emit 'discard' when an item is removed, grouplist emits 'discard' when a group is removed, and the manager emits 'discard' when an entire notification model is removed. This means we can actually have proper hierarchy and organization with a single event, and not worry about clashing between the intentional 'discard' action and the event 'remove' that is also used while resorting happens. * The model manager emits a discard event when a model is removed so that the general list can listen to the manager and remove an entire batch of items if needed. * The pagination model now updates the count for the current page rather than some vague notion of the last page. This is also updated when the controller removes items, so we can get an accurate count in the page for the number of notifications that are displayed. Bug: T136891 Change-Id: I247c618042ef256fadf09922f7b83bd1ad361f64
2016-07-14 00:03:57 +00:00
if ( items[ i ].getName() === groupName ) {
return items[ i ];
}
}
return null;
};
}() );