mirror of
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/mediawiki/extensions/DiscussionTools
synced 2024-11-17 13:12:26 +00:00
b4029c3c58
If two signatures for a single comment were near each other, we would sometimes treat them as one huge signature. Change-Id: Ied4b3aa535a9ca6bebef8a004ae48b7d5a8f2f9b
26 lines
1.1 KiB
JavaScript
26 lines
1.1 KiB
JavaScript
var
|
|
parser = require( 'ext.discussionTools.parser' ),
|
|
highlighter = require( './highlighter.js' ),
|
|
timestamps, comments, threads, i, node, match, signature, emptySignature;
|
|
|
|
timestamps = parser.findTimestamps( document.getElementById( 'mw-content-text' ) );
|
|
comments = parser.getComments( document.getElementById( 'mw-content-text' ) );
|
|
threads = parser.groupThreads( comments );
|
|
|
|
highlighter.markThreads( threads );
|
|
|
|
// TODO: Use comment.signatureRanges to mark up signatures/timestamps
|
|
for ( i = 0; i < timestamps.length; i++ ) {
|
|
node = timestamps[ i ][ 0 ];
|
|
match = timestamps[ i ][ 1 ];
|
|
signature = parser.findSignature( node )[ 0 ];
|
|
emptySignature = signature.length === 1 && signature[ 0 ] === node;
|
|
// Note that additional content may follow the timestamp (e.g. in some voting formats), but we
|
|
// don't care about it. The code below doesn't mark that due to now the text nodes are sliced,
|
|
// but we might need to take care to use the matched range of node in other cases.
|
|
highlighter.markTimestamp( node, match );
|
|
if ( !emptySignature ) {
|
|
highlighter.markSignature( signature );
|
|
}
|
|
}
|