Also special-case thumbnail wrappers generated by
MediaTransformOutput::linkWrap, for compatibility with
TimedMediaHandler.
Bug: T301427
Bug: T302296
Change-Id: I7f48d8b2261507c5a33526c54109f5187d062ed3
Previously, we required a signature at the end of the comment.
This was a pretty rough heuristic that did not correctly handle
many comments that we would consider entirely properly signed
in CommentParser (e.g. comments wrapped in formatting like
<small>…</small>, comments with a post-scriptum or in parentheses,
or comments generated by various templates).
Now we process the user input using the same code that adds reply
links, and only add a signature when we detect that there really
isn't a signature (including template-generated), or if the signature
is in the wrong place and would result in the reply link showing up
in the wrong place as well (not at the end of the comment).
Bug: T278442
Bug: T268558
Bug: T278355
Bug: T291421
Bug: T282983
Change-Id: I46b6110af328ebdf93b7dfc2bd941e04391a1599
It adds white-space between block tags and strips invisible tags.
It may be slightly slower (it takes HTML as input rather than DOM, so
we need to serialize the HTML first and then call it, rather than only
find and concatenate text nodes), but the difference is negligible,
and it seems better to use this method than to try to re-implement it.
Test runtime went from ~9.0s to ~9.5s locally, when testing using:
php tests/phpunit/phpunit.php \
extensions/DiscussionTools/tests/phpunit/ThreadItemTest.php \
--filter getText
Bug: T219138
Change-Id: I0cb89ebd2160e1ef499b78573c6688f493a4c42f
* We don't need it anywhere in JS, since we're not sending that HTML
to Parsoid.
* We only need it on the nodes directly containing our reply lines in
PHP, not all over the place.
Change-Id: I0a04388225f32654dda2f599442cd27a303b5d0a
When we encounter a node that doesn't represent comment contents, e.g.:
* a [reply] link we inserted (T297034#7641334)
* an {{outdent}} template (see changed test case)
…we should ignore it together with its descendants (like in
Parser#nextInterestingLeafNode), instead of processing descendants
and possibly detecting comment contents in them.
Follow-up to 8de940b587,
72b9c2c6f5.
Bug: T297034
Change-Id: Ib2fa40c5fa389572b0e88ef558728fa06e3621b0
Prior to 8de940b5, the comments on this page would not be marked as
partially transcluded.
Bug: T298408
Change-Id: Ib7eb8b4113151048c0e778b3530600d98dd8f705
These are not used for anything yet, but soon the parser will
want to know the title of the page it is parsing.
Change-Id: I02fa5d63fae78f3e92032d93bc27ac5c744faecb
Reimplement getFullyCoveredSiblings() using compareRanges(), which
checks basically the same thing, but works better and I like it more.
Bug: T297034
Change-Id: I33dc1d088bdee984064315290e378bfbfa830b10
Previously: 569db3603c (2020-06).
Unfortunately we've found cases where the previous implementation
doesn't work correctly, resulting in comments being added to the wrong
pages or page corruption.
Bug: T289873
Bug: T298051
Change-Id: Id867b3005ebc46906d6df852a525fcaec9e6b19b
Comment boundaries are stored as a DOM parent node plus a child index.
Because of that, inserting anything into the DOM before a comment –
such as another comment's start/end markers – would cause us to insert
subsequent comments' markers into the wrong places.
This issue didn't affect many pages, because usually any parent node
would have just one comment in it. Only pages with comment boundaries
outside of any wrappers (directly inside the root node) were broken.
Just process the list in reverse to fix this.
Bug: T298096
Change-Id: Iccffc36b71e9fcf3d72c4db2b9459d39042f7a2d
Servers as another test case for partially transcluded comments,
and a test case for comment start markers placed outside of
paragraphs.
Bug: T298051
Bug: T298096
Change-Id: Id07d2f57708c037578cb653c83848490c9a15fc6
Usually this isn't a problem, because the comments are marked as
template-generated and we don't allow replying to them. But we had a
special case where we were trying to skip over some invisible
elements, which was causing us to skip into the middle of the
about-group in some cases. When Parsoid sees that, it serializes the
contents twice.
Bug: T290940
Change-Id: I9fe0b8d43ab874ccef371990799f77bfc46bc954
The PHP DOM extension measures lengths and offsets in Unicode codepoints.
Our PHP code used UTF-8 bytes, causing some offsets to be slightly off.
Now it mostly uses Unicode codepoints as well (we're forced to use bytes
in a few places, because preg_match returns offsets in bytes).
In practice, this had no visible effect to the user. It caused the
markers `<span data-mw-comment-end="..."></span>` to be placed at
the end of their container instead of the correct position when the
timestamp contained multibyte characters (e.g. "ź" in Polish); but
the correct position is usually at the end of the container anyway.
In the test cases, the only difference is placing these markers before
a trailing line break inside `<p>...</p>` tags rather than before it.
The patch also accidentally fixes another bug, where element nodes
with no children (mostly <img>) were incorrectly excluded when calling
cloneContents(), because they were treated as if they were text nodes.
Change-Id: Iccdccf1078598f4b62cab96225e9c85a4c0e93ee
If the user talk edit or mention coincides with exactly one new comment:
* Change the primary link to be a direct link to the comment
* Add a text snippet to notifications that don't already include one
(user talk edits that are not new sections).
This is done for all such notifications, regardless of whether anyone
has topic subscriptions enabled.
Bug: T281590
Bug: T253082
Change-Id: I98fbca8e57845cd7c82ad533c393db953e4e5643
* ThreadItem::getText
* CommentItem::getBodyText (used when generating notifications)
* ThreadItem::getHTML (may soon be used in API)
* CommentItem::getBodyHTML (may soon be used in API)
* ImmutableRange::cloneContents (the common implementation for all
of the above)
The outputs are only lightly reviewed. This is mostly meant to
document the current behavior rather than the expected behavior,
to avoid making unintentional changes while refactoring.
Change-Id: I14471ee4969aa3d0b5577d9de2a6d4462fab4d09
The code (prior to d25825a754) assumed
that level 3+ headings would always follow a level 2 heading or the
placeholder heading, but we don't generate a placeholder heading if
there are no comments in section zero.
Add more tests to confirm that comments under level 3+ headings (that
are not sub-headings of level 2), and level 1 headings, are ignored
when generating notifications, and do not mess with normal headings.
Bug: T288775
Change-Id: Ic57b56752a4797cb01234f66e0ed7b849752bd70
Adding test cases in a separate commit to make it easier to review how
the test results change after I98fbca8e.
* For mentions, the 'mentioned-users' extra parameter is copied to our
event (which is then used to avoid duplicate notifications).
* For user talk page edit, nothing special happens right now (we use
the target page title to avoid duplicate notifications, but this is
not apparent from the test case, since page titles are not present).
Bug: T281590
Bug: T253082
Change-Id: I153e7735f63f1e2643ed881281d807313cd699c3
In case 4 and case 6, no notifications are expected. In all other
cases we now get the expected notifications.
Bug: T285528
Change-Id: I9e813bb3a053bc1232783f9eae1ad75672b4fa7e
Adding test cases in a separate commit to make it easier to review how
the test results change.
As expected, in every case, no notifications are generated right now.
Bug: T285528
Change-Id: I25308754112c521d2db8c54ef0c82373456d9e31
The user interface only allows you to subscribe to level 2 headings.
But we would generate events for whatever heading was the closest,
If it was e.g. level 3, no one would receive that notification.
Now we generate events for the closest level 2 heading, or we don't
generate the event at all if there isn't one (if the only headings are
of level 3 and below, or level 1, or if the comment is added before
the first heading on the page).
Bug: T286736
Change-Id: Iae99853070e353ab81c9cc29ef1d53c877adfc66
The issue occurred when replying to a comment consisting of multiple
list items, starting with a <dt> (instead of the expected <dd>), so
that the comment is considered to be unindented.
Modifier tried to add the reply directly inside the list (<dl>) rather
than inside the last list item (<dt>), which caused it to be confused
about indentation levels and try to un-indent more times than there
were indentations.
The simplest solution, given the existing code, is to add the reply
outside the list instead, in a new list. This results in a "list gap"
(<dl><dt>...</dt><dd>...</dd></dl><dl><dd>...</dd></dl>), but I think
it's acceptable for this rare case.
There are separate tests cases for old Parser and for Parsoid HTML,
because they parse the original wikitext differently (with the old
Parser producing HTML with a list gap too).
Bug: T279445
Change-Id: Ie0ee960e7090cf051ee547b480c980e9530eda51
We added it because the initial designs for the subscribe action were
much easier to implement like this, and topic "containers" (T269950)
would have required it.
However, the latest design of the subscribe action will not need it
(T279149), and topic containers are still very far away, so let's
remove it for now.
Bug: T280433
Change-Id: I21a23e9bea43f24d265750926fbd62b99038d3f1
The existing comment IDs can't be used to find the same comment on
a different revision or page (when it's transcluded), because they
depend on the comment's parent and its position on the page.
Comment names depend only on the author and timestamp. The trade-off
is that they can't distinguish comments posted within the same minute,
or in the same edit, so we will still need the IDs sometimes.
Prefer using comment names when replying, if they're not ambiguous.
This fixes T273413 and T275821.
Heading names depend on the author and timestamp of the oldest comment.
This way we don't have to detect changes to the heading text, but we
can't distinguish headings without any comments.
Bug: T274685
Bug: T273413
Bug: T275821
Change-Id: Id85c50ba38d1e532cec106708c077b908a3fcd49
Longer, but follows the style guide and less likely to conflict.
We need to account for init classes in the cache being around for
a while.
Change-Id: I738bc93393850db320fdbda2b003ca8ac40556da
The code we're testing already produces a string of serialized HTML,
no need to parse and re-serialize it.
Also, we recently learned that the precise format matters here
(T274709), and now this test *actually* covers the fix for that bug.
Follow-up to 5b26e9664b.
As a downside, this test might now spuriously fail if the format of
the output of Parsoid's XMLSerializer changes. Hopefully that won't
happen too often.
Change-Id: I69b514f545e47dcb437fb39a83edb8e2f19ed99b
Now it detect signatures generated by en.wp's {{Undated}} template,
and signatures of people who do weird stuff to the timestamps.
Bug: T275938
Change-Id: I27b07f6786ca5433a3c02a5fe68e4716d41401bb
The horrendous 11-line if() condition did not correctly handle
signatures wrapped in inline formatting markup, like <small>.
Instead, implement this logic in the code for skipping to the end
of a paragraph, which didn't exist yet when that condition was
added, but seems like a much better place to check this now.
Bug: T275934
Change-Id: I5cccff889b5e15b5f8fde0538bf4bccb22e762cf
This code expected $container->firstChild to be a
<div class="mw-parser-output">, but that element is not present
when we're running on HTML to be saved in parser cache.
We ended up inserting the marker inside whatever node was the
first on the page, and if it was a <style> element, both our
marker and the styles would be lost when serializing, like in
6c7a0ca9a2.
When we're running on final HTML, the marker will now be outside
of <div class="mw-parser-output">, but that seems to be fine. Only
early versions of I4e60fdbc098c1a74757d6e60fec6bcf8e5db37c1 had
problems with that (see comments on patchset 41), but it works now.
The added test case also covers the fix for T274709.
Bug: T275440
Change-Id: I38d45dd8686919be51e1d307ded12b0afe185eb5
Top-level comments that start or end with a list (inconsistent
indentation) would not have triggered the logic for detecting
wrappers.
Bug: T273692
Change-Id: Idcb4eed73e391f5f86eca2eb05cb3cea0d86f30a
For a moment I doubted if we handle this case correctly, but in fact
I didn't botch that code *this* badly.
Change-Id: I5a9d142e4bd97ac40aa388bb43b65ab1286e3f18
* Ignore rendering-transparent nodes between discussion comments.
* Improve isRenderingTransparentNode() so that <link> nodes
representing TemplateStyles are not considered transparent,
otherwise this would undo ae920b831f.
Using a regexp from Parsoid.
Bug: T272746
Change-Id: I0b3c3251156ba6c4826abf5ba44ea93f80ebc01d
Add yet another tree walking utility: CommentUtils::linearWalk().
Unlike TreeWalker, it allows handling the beginnings and ends of nodes
separately – kind of like parsing a XML token stream, or kind of like
VisualEditor's linear model.
(Add unit tests for this utility. The simple.html test case is copied
from [VisualEditor/VisualEditor]/demos/ve/pages/simple.html.)
Use this utility to stop skipping when we reach either a closing or
opening block node tag. Previously we'd skip over such tags inside
nested "transparent" nodes (like <a>, <del>, or apparently <font>).
Bug: T271385
Change-Id: I201a942eb3a56335e84d94e150ec2c33f8b4f4e0
As a result of 0fc71f60cd, "empty" text
nodes (containing only whitespace) at the end of the comment may be
inside the comment's range, and trying to ignore them caused the
ranges not to match and the frame not to be detected.
Now the code works whether they're inside the comment's range or not.
Add a test case for wrapped discussion comments with HTML comments and
with whitespace.
Bug: T250126
Bug: T268407
Change-Id: I2217ff5a635fd1c9c9e803f46795b1bfb3d17535
While working on T270009, I noticed that <style> and <link> nodes
are treated differently, which seemed weird. Rewrite this again,
hopefully this is the last time.
The changed test cases also involve <area> and <input> nodes,
and the new results make more sense to me.
Bug: T264116
Change-Id: I3af90c84768a4b3dc53446927f4dba6f72175a2f
We've recently decided that we want to "extend" comments until
the end of the paragraph (e36dc8e78a,
d0ae6c4e44).
However, we still had this special case that did the opposite: it
ensured that if a comment ended in the middle of a text node, the
comment would not be extended to the end of the node. Remove it.
Note the change in the test file signatures-funny-formattedreply.html,
which actually covered this case specifically.
Change-Id: Id1384bb0c6e1a5f0c70f55efcb4caa240f230f07
The end marker is skipped forward until an open or close
block tag is reached. In tree traversal terms this means
moving either to the next sibling, or the parent (to skip
over close tags).
Bug: T256033
Change-Id: Iaa2c588698790d576ac4f9ecc126f58a082ef6b3
The general rule is that comments start after their preceding
thread item, but when that is a heading we should skip past
the entire <h[1-6]> node to avoid making section edit links
part of the first comment.
Bug: T267988
Change-Id: Ia7f1b27e0a69a9aab7c7da743bf8549479304096
As CommentFormatter no longer needs HTMLFormatter, remove
the inheritance and make addReplyLinks a static method.
Testing locally this is marginally slower, going from 2.55s
to 2.9s for the CommentFormatterTest case.
Bug: T266317
Bug: T267973
Change-Id: If69749cae678a1647a138d782a32032189f55cec
After recent changes allowing ThreadItems to have IDs, they can now
also have warnings about duplicate IDs.
Bug: T267035
Change-Id: If3edfe34e6e29741e29fac8946a3c88badc4ab7f
Use the same logic for marking ranges in the document, and ensure
that the heading range does not include section edit links or
section numberings.
Change-Id: I782caafc34fee2a822b0a17b24dd6b9528202eca
We avoided fixing these because it causes changes in just about all of
the test data, which is annoying when reviewing or blaming changes.
But the previous several commits also caused changes in just about all
of the test data, so we might as well do this too.
Change-Id: I83b64d83b6f12c04dc06c0cadff7cdd89417e137
To avoid old threads re-appearing on popular pages when someone
uses a vague title (e.g. dozens of threads titled "question" on
[[Wikipedia:Help desk]]: https://w.wiki/fbN), include the oldest
timestamp in the thread (i.e. date the thread was started) in the
heading ID.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: If918bfd5e025248923d1939bc86916697ead95a0
Sequential numbers aren't great because they change when an earlier
comment is archived. Parent comment/heading IDs should change less
often.
This also makes much more sense for disambiguating subsections,
e.g. a dozen identical ===Votes=== sections for a dozen proposals.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I466454984fd919ebef35f2b37ddb5d86dc842996
Our threads now also contain all replies to their sub-threads.
This is similar to how sections work in MediaWiki, where the parent
section also contains the content of all the lower-level sections.
We're going to need this for notifications about replies in a thread.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I241fc58e2088a7555942824b0f184ed21e3a8b6f
Previously, only comments could have IDs, because we only needed IDs
for replying. But we might also use them for notifications soon.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I1bcad02bf17ab54bc5028a959543c10f0430836b
I haven't really reviewed the outputs, but at least a) they don't
crash b) they will fail if the output suddenly changes (which could
cause problems due to caching).
Bug: T252555
Change-Id: I1bbcbc5dd17ce1e24b3622062f5e8df4baf5f389
Also, add tests covering this and the previous bug fixes in this code
(T259818, T261706).
Note that the test data added in tests/cases/ doesn't exactly match
the entire configuration of the wiki, only the parts we want to cover.
This is unlike the data in tests/data/, which was literally copied
from the relevant wikis, and which is used as input for other tests.
Bug: T265500
Change-Id: I29a59a5952f6dc9fb5910434bb6bcc9dcdaa01a9
