Rename ThreadItem to ContentThreadItem, then create a new ThreadItem
interface containing only the methods that we'll be able to implement
using only the persistently stored data (no parsing), then create a
DatabaseThreadItem. Do the same for CommentItem and HeadingItem.
ThreadItemSet gets a similar treatment, but it's basically only for
Phan's type checking. (This is sad.)
Change-Id: I1633049befe8ec169753b82eb876459af1f63fe8
While in many cases the class will never be sub-classed, it's easier
just to always use static:: and not worry about predicting which
classes might have problems in the future.
Change-Id: I23072a1701b5acf62bb3379a877de97627d8fcf3
Also fix a bug where headings would be ignored while checking for
comment frames. See task for detailed explanation.
Bug: T303396
Change-Id: I6495826b4b050ea80680e0798ac6ab4497a7c09e
Phan can analyze them now and reports some issues with types.
* Add some assertions on types where we're sure that we're using an
Element or non-null, but Phan can't prove it
* Fix incorrect type hints on getFullyCoveredSiblings() and
getCoveredSiblings(), luckily it was harmless
Change-Id: I8cc12450378efa7434c4d66882378b715edd4a70
`tagName` is only defined on Element, and it returns its tag name.
`nodeName` is defined on Node, and it returns the tag name for Elements,
and a string like '#text' or '#document-fragment' for other types.
We were using both, which made it harder to reason about what types
we're dealing with.
Change-Id: I8e621e5872bdf78c84ec553cfbfcdbf0192f0589
It is friendlier for static analysis tools like Phan, which can't
infer anything from the `->nodeType === …` checks, and we were already
using it in most places.
Fix newly revealed Phan failures (and one unneeded suppression).
Change-Id: Id789f05e16a210f7ba22ca7514587c392fac0741
Previously, we required a signature at the end of the comment.
This was a pretty rough heuristic that did not correctly handle
many comments that we would consider entirely properly signed
in CommentParser (e.g. comments wrapped in formatting like
<small>…</small>, comments with a post-scriptum or in parentheses,
or comments generated by various templates).
Now we process the user input using the same code that adds reply
links, and only add a signature when we detect that there really
isn't a signature (including template-generated), or if the signature
is in the wrong place and would result in the reply link showing up
in the wrong place as well (not at the end of the comment).
Bug: T278442
Bug: T268558
Bug: T278355
Bug: T291421
Bug: T282983
Change-Id: I46b6110af328ebdf93b7dfc2bd941e04391a1599
We were rendering the preview in a completely different way from how
we would add the real reply, and the results would be different
sometimes, particularly for multi-line comments with messed-up markup.
Render it server-side instead, in a very similar way to real replies
(generating a DOM list node and transforming it through Parsoid),
although without the whole context of the page to improve performance.
We can remove a lot of client-side code that was used solely for this.
This will allow the preview to accurately display the signatures when
we change how they are added (T278442), without us having to implement
those changes again from scratch for the preview.
Change-Id: I53341f4d4075c25b67ec3b3032bff9b8a880dcd3
Goal: To be able to re-use or test the transformations we previously
performed in addWikitextReply() / addHtmlReply(), without requiring
a Comment object or adding the result as a reply.
Change-Id: I040c4be9b6b9bddba661f30fd0566f8850673074
* We don't need it anywhere in JS, since we're not sending that HTML
to Parsoid.
* We only need it on the nodes directly containing our reply lines in
PHP, not all over the place.
Change-Id: I0a04388225f32654dda2f599442cd27a303b5d0a
After switching from source mode to visual mode, there will be some
Parsoid-generated white space between block nodes, which remains when
the reply is posted in visual mode.
Follow-up to e064f43499.
Bug: T300439
Change-Id: Ia5d2c06f0a4125e9f148eddd3235f95138c9d37f
The following values for configuration variables are supported:
$wgDiscussionToolsReplyIndentation = 'invisible'; (default)
$wgDiscussionToolsReplyIndentation = 'bullet';
Bug: T259864
Change-Id: Icefad79630adc6ed35687498614e6a03ede1451b
Use DOMCompat::querySelectorAll() instead.
CommentModifier::isHtmlSigned()
* Copied the CSS selector from the JS equivalent function.
CommentUtils::unwrapParsoidSections()
* Copied the CSS selector from the JS equivalent function (in VisualEditor).
CommentItem::getMentions()
* Trivial.
This causes Phan to report some more issues, which are also fixed.
Follow-up to 25272e7a4a.
Change-Id: Iaf1222f7114916f2eca19942c3686168899486fd
These changes ensure that DiscussionTools is independent of DOM
library choice, and will not break if/when Parsoid switches to an
alternate (more standards-compliant) DOM library.
We run `phan` against the Dodo standards-compliant DOM library,
so this ends up flagging uses of non-standard PHP extensions to
the DOM. These will be suppressed for now with a "Nonstandard DOM"
comment that can be grepped for, since they will eventually
will need to be rewritten or worked around.
Most frequent issues:
* Node::nodeValue and Node::textContent and Element::getAttribute()
can return null in a spec-compliant implementation. Add `?? ''` to
make spec-compliant results consistent w/ what PHP returns.
* DOMXPath doesn't accept anything except DOMDocument. These uses
should be replaced with DOMCompat::querySelectorAll() or similar
(which end up using DOMXPath under the covers for DOMDocument any way,
but are implemented more efficiently in a spec-compliant
implementation).
* A couple of times we have code like:
`while ($node->firstChild!==null) { $node = $node->firstChild; }`
and phan's analysis isn't strong enough to determine that $node is still
non-null after the while. This same issue should appear with DOMDocument
but phan doesn't complain for some reason.
One apparently legit issue:
* Node::insertBefore() is once called in a funny way which leans on
the fact that the second option is optional in PHP. This seems to be
a workaround for an ancient PHP bug, and can probably be safely
removed.
Bug: T287611
Bug: T217867
Change-Id: I3c4f41c3819770f85d68157c9f690d650b7266a3
The issue occurred when replying to a comment consisting of multiple
list items, starting with a <dt> (instead of the expected <dd>), so
that the comment is considered to be unindented.
Modifier tried to add the reply directly inside the list (<dl>) rather
than inside the last list item (<dt>), which caused it to be confused
about indentation levels and try to un-indent more times than there
were indentations.
The simplest solution, given the existing code, is to add the reply
outside the list instead, in a new list. This results in a "list gap"
(<dl><dt>...</dt><dd>...</dd></dl><dl><dd>...</dd></dl>), but I think
it's acceptable for this rare case.
There are separate tests cases for old Parser and for Parsoid HTML,
because they parse the original wikitext differently (with the old
Parser producing HTML with a list gap too).
Bug: T279445
Change-Id: Ie0ee960e7090cf051ee547b480c980e9530eda51
If curLevel or desiredLevel are calculated incorrectly, this loop
could never end.
In JS, something would throw an exception before going infinite, but
PHP is happy to trot along despite accessing properties of null and
attaching multiple children to a document node.
Bug: T279445
Change-Id: I1784f550ec3a23dcded4f2b1def97e51cb414b7b
Yes, this is still needed, removing it causes failures in tests
(and the old outputs look better).
Change-Id: I5bcedb0295a1f0ac4f6e51eaa9a9e072d8236f3c
Top-level comments that start or end with a list (inconsistent
indentation) would not have triggered the logic for detecting
wrappers.
Bug: T273692
Change-Id: Idcb4eed73e391f5f86eca2eb05cb3cea0d86f30a
1. Extend the JS modifier to allow adding top-level comments
(that is, replies to headings). PHP modifier doesn't do this
because we'll save the changes using paction=addtopic instead.
2. Subclass CommentController to allow adding a new heading and a
top-level comment underneath it at the same time.
3. A lot of ugly code in ReplyWidget to customize the interface
for this case. Much of it should probably be moved to
CommentController/NewTopicController.
Bug: T267595
Change-Id: I9c707bb7f7aae1b92c72fb4dee436490f8c8409b
When a comment ended before the end of a paragraph, the next
comment would begin right there in the middle of the paragraph.
This could result in the detected indentation level of that
comment being incorrect, and replies being inserted in wrong
places, as seen in the 'signatures-funny' test case.
The code moved to the parser was previously repeated twice in
addListItem() and addReplyLink(), which should have been a hint
that something isn't quite right.
Also, fix the code guarding against overlapping signatures,
now that signatures may not be at the end of a comment.
Bug: T260855
Change-Id: Ic26a87642f8a15d5de2f7073d4d8176b299c7f94
When adding a reply, we take a node at the end of the previous comment,
compare that comment's indentation level to the expected indentation level
of the reply, and add (or remove) that number of wrapper lists.
The existing code did not consider that comments may have lists within
them, and so the indentation of that node may not match the indentation
of the comment.
Bug: T252702
Change-Id: Icc5ff19783d2b213bff99f283cb0599a8b5c1ab4
Previously we preferred that, but used '*' (<ul><li>) when the parent
comment or the previous reply also used it.
Bug: T252708
Change-Id: I3abf606da6693905764f1be745fad999fdf57fbe
* Remove the existing approach for detecting signatures that only
worked in source mode; remove autoSignWikitext()
* Use the same approach for auto-signing in source mode as we have
already used in visual
* In both modes, detect whether the user has already typed a signature
at the end of their comment in the modifier, and if so, don't add a
signature
* Add test cases for the detection
Bug: T255738
Change-Id: I791d3035cb1ffc33ce3966d4617a25d08700c35b
