Use the same logic for marking ranges in the document, and ensure
that the heading range does not include section edit links or
section numberings.
Change-Id: I782caafc34fee2a822b0a17b24dd6b9528202eca
Skipping them could result in incorrect handling when RESTBase HTML is
outdated.
When a result for a given comment is not found, display an error
instead of assuming it is not transcluded.
Bug: T262065
Change-Id: I14a7a0a25d5181b5c49bd5677f0c002dce5a3cb9
We depended on the oldid (wgCurRevisionId) changing after a reply is
posted, but it will not change if we posted to a transcluded page.
Bug: T266275
Change-Id: I1baa1f2227134b73fd663de2fee3ea96a2f9b183
We avoided fixing these because it causes changes in just about all of
the test data, which is annoying when reviewing or blaming changes.
But the previous several commits also caused changes in just about all
of the test data, so we might as well do this too.
Change-Id: I83b64d83b6f12c04dc06c0cadff7cdd89417e137
To avoid old threads re-appearing on popular pages when someone
uses a vague title (e.g. dozens of threads titled "question" on
[[Wikipedia:Help desk]]: https://w.wiki/fbN), include the oldest
timestamp in the thread (i.e. date the thread was started) in the
heading ID.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: If918bfd5e025248923d1939bc86916697ead95a0
Sequential numbers aren't great because they change when an earlier
comment is archived. Parent comment/heading IDs should change less
often.
This also makes much more sense for disambiguating subsections,
e.g. a dozen identical ===Votes=== sections for a dozen proposals.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I466454984fd919ebef35f2b37ddb5d86dc842996
Our threads now also contain all replies to their sub-threads.
This is similar to how sections work in MediaWiki, where the parent
section also contains the content of all the lower-level sections.
We're going to need this for notifications about replies in a thread.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I241fc58e2088a7555942824b0f184ed21e3a8b6f
Previously, only comments could have IDs, because we only needed IDs
for replying. But we might also use them for notifications soon.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I1bcad02bf17ab54bc5028a959543c10f0430836b
The output of CommentFormatter::addReplyLinks() and consequently
ThreadItem::jsonSerialize() can end up in the HTTP cache (Varnish) on
Wikimedia wikis. We need to consider that when changing that code.
Introduce a concept of legacy ID (generated by the older algorithm
after it changes), add some placeholder code that will generate them
in the future, and update some code to find comments by either normal
or legacy IDs.
Add dire comments in a bunch of places (as if that ever helps).
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I4368f366800ab21b8b184b09378037614fdecd33
"This modifies the original objects…" – I feel like this is obvious
now, but maybe it wasn't so obvious when this code was structured
differently before a2431fe006. Also,
it refers to a variable that doesn't exist.
"FIXME this will clone the reply…" – No, actually, it will not.
It would if replies were associative arrays, but they are objects,
and have always been, ever since the PHP parser was merged in
7b7a2cd69c. Maybe they were arrays
once in Roan's mind before he pushed that for review.
Change-Id: I1348e111699fdbde99cd1f9ef45d8f465f7391b0
We can check whether a node is a child of another node directly,
without iterating over all its children.
Change-Id: I3a26df89365bf765348d96b477c983ec9c4e43fe
* Add the preference
* Only display it when the reply tool is enabled
* Use it when opening the reply tool
* Save it when the menu is toggled from the reply tool interface
Bug: T261539
Change-Id: Icb8fa6b3f1e9a3644669f21b08f34ea8c175f2f9
I haven't really reviewed the outputs, but at least a) they don't
crash b) they will fail if the output suddenly changes (which could
cause problems due to caching).
Bug: T252555
Change-Id: I1bbcbc5dd17ce1e24b3622062f5e8df4baf5f389
This is not necessary, and never has been. This variable contains an
object and it's never assigned to.
Instead, the reference creates hard-to-debug bugs (I've just spent
an hour debugging one). When the variable name is reused later in
the same function as the loop variable of another foreach() loop
(such as in If918bfd5e0), the result is overwriting of the last entry
in $this->threadItems with the last entry from the other array.
I was questioning everything I know about variables until I noticed.
Change-Id: Ibb57f915b39dd4d6d2e744903f9ecadd67b1f52d
Also, add tests covering this and the previous bug fixes in this code
(T259818, T261706).
Note that the test data added in tests/cases/ doesn't exactly match
the entire configuration of the wiki, only the parts we want to cover.
This is unlike the data in tests/data/, which was literally copied
from the relevant wikis, and which is used as input for other tests.
Bug: T265500
Change-Id: I29a59a5952f6dc9fb5910434bb6bcc9dcdaa01a9
