Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bartosz Dziewoński 04365c0188 Merge RL modules which are only loaded by 'ext.discussionTools.init'
Bug: T240474
Change-Id: I1b83aa18666be8f1ea6a3602b299f92574d42cb7
2020-03-14 14:33:23 +01:00
Bartosz Dziewoński e3e4ef9de4 parser: Detect comments transcluded from another page
When trying to reply to a comment that is inside a transclusion,
detect if it's transcluded from a subpage or simply wrapped in a
template, and show appropriate error messages.

References:
* VisualEditor ve.dm.Converter#getAboutGroup()
* VisualEditor ve.dm.ModelRegistry#matchElement()
* Parsoid Linter#findEnclosingTemplateName()

Bug: T245694
Change-Id: If3dd1ebbf1d02ee4379c200019bfc3a8ec02325b
2020-03-09 20:28:56 +01:00
Bartosz Dziewoński 606d6b34ec Add reply links at the end of a line, even if the signature is in the middle
Previously they were added at the end of the text node containing the
timestamp, which was usually the end of the line, but not always.

And also fix the same problem for inserting the actual replies (or
reply widgets). This replaces an undocumented hack that prevented our
own reply links from triggering this bug (without it, the reply widget
would be inserted before the reply link rather than after).

While we're here, remove unintentional spacing that appeared before
some reply links, caused by trailing whitespace in text nodes.

Add tests for all of the above.

Bug: T245695
Change-Id: I354b63e2446bb996176a2e3d76abf944127f307e
2020-03-02 21:39:37 +01:00
jenkins-bot 0e22b4c79f Merge "Clean up the interface after discarding a reply" 2020-02-27 23:05:00 +00:00
Bartosz Dziewoński d068d2ef2c Clean up the interface after discarding a reply
Bug: T245574
Change-Id: I016a7a5c44e0d15a153143177976cceb8d6d3d1b
2020-02-27 18:09:34 +01:00
Bartosz Dziewoński 2a93ed11b4 Rearrange test cases
I think directories like this make more sense for adding more test cases.

Depends-On: I9153851fe162c012967fda00d3e1f81964a8dce9
Change-Id: Ibc72b747a75c72643c1fc04eae49bd15656e8104
2020-02-25 00:19:30 +00:00
Bartosz Dziewoński 890588f36a Pick reply insertion point based on parser tree, not DOM tree
I don't like that I had to special-case `<p>` tags (top-level
comments) in this code. I feel like it should be possible to handle
top-level comments and replies in a generic way, but I couldn't find
a way to do it that actually worked.

Notes about changes to the behavior, based on the test cases:

* Given a top-level comment A, if there was a "list gap" in the
  replies to it: previously new replies would be incorrectly added at
  the location of the gap; now they are added after the last reply.
  (T242822)

  Example: "pl", comment at "08:23, 29 wrz 2018 (CEST)"

* Given a top-level comment A and a reply to it B that skips an
  indentation level: previously new replies to A would be added with
  the same indentation level as B; now they are added with the
  indentation level of A plus one. (The old behavior wasn't a bug, and
  this is an accidental effect of other changes, but it seems okay.)

  Example: "pl", comment at "03:22, 30 wrz 2018 (CEST)"
    and reply at "09:43, 30 wrz 2018 (CEST)"

* Given a top-level comment A, a reply to it B, and a following
  top-level comment C that starts at the same indentation level as B:
  previously new replies to A would be incorrectly added in the middle
  of the comment C, due to the DOM list structure; now they are added
  before C. (T241391)

  (It seems that comment C was supposed to be a multi-line reply that
  was wrongly indented. Unfortunately we have no way to distinguish
  this case from a top-level multi-line comment that just happens to
  start with a bullet list.)

  Example: "pl", comments at "03:36, 24 paź 2018 (CEST)",
    "08:35, 24 paź 2018 (CEST)", "17:14, 24 paź 2018 (CEST)"

* In the "en" example, there are some other changes where funnily
  nested tags result in slightly different results with the new code.
  They don't look important.

* In rare cases, we must split an existing list to add a reply in the
  right place. (Basically add `</ul>` before the reply and `<ul>`
  after, but it's a bit awkward in DOM terms.)

  Example: split-list.html, comment "aaa"; also split-list2.html
    (which is the result of saving the previous reply), comment "aaa"

* The modifier can no longer generate DOM that is invalid HTML, fixing
  a FIXME in modifier.test.js (or at least, it doesn't happen in these
  test cases any more).

Bug: T241391
Bug: T242822
Change-Id: I2a70db01e9a8916c5636bc59ea8490166966d5ec
2020-01-23 21:13:12 +01:00
Bartosz Dziewoński da732843f3 Integration tests for the modifier
Document the current behavior of the modifier (which inserts the
replies into the DOM tree), so that we can more easily see the effect
of changes in I2a70db01e9a8916c5636bc59ea8490166966d5ec.

Basically, add a reply to every comment, and dump the resulting HTML,
comparing it to previously generated expected HTML (which can be
checked visually). Have a look at the new HTML files.

Notably, the very first section in the "pl" example demonstrates a
case of wrong reply location due to list gap :) (T242822).

Change-Id: I4aed0f0b112f53d98e3fe1da4d40db8687c7e537
2020-01-22 00:58:06 +01:00