We used an internal API requests to fetch page content because it was
easy, but there's no way to guarantee that it returns data from the
primary database.
Use ParserOutputAccess::getParserOutput() to fetch from cache if
available. Also, use canonical output instead of user-specific,
not that it should matter.
Bug: T285895
Change-Id: I7dcd9659be77746dc2a0c4eeae2319887936b555
…without making the topic subscriptions feature available in user preferences.
Follow-up to these commits, which added these checks in ad-hoc ways:
* 9420f22e9d
* f3422f40a6
* 23a490deca
* a555db7892
Bug: T284491
Change-Id: If2e3fb1e06d1cc489fbca14796ed77c83bb52991
If the revision from which we generated the notification has been
deleted, we shouldn't include the content snippet, nor the direct link
to the comment (because the fragment ID is generated from the content).
This matches how Echo handles mention notifications.
Change-Id: Ica939f3a4efd39d0c295511d58280d3f9d584129
As it happens, most of Echo does not actually parse this message,
but it is for some reason parsed in HTML email notifications.
Change-Id: I414cd242d9bcc4d8b5a1c2a2a71be9e5f00ea8be
We don't display [subscribe] buttons on your user talk page,
but the API still allows those subscriptions.
Use the same approach as for mentions to ensure this doesn't cause
duplicate notifications.
Remove some code in SubscribedNewCommentPresentationModel,
now guaranteed to be unused.
Change-Id: I99a276a48d8562552ed2c54cc0323e8e428845fd
Otherwise, the global context is used (RequestContext::getMain()),
which is undesirable when you're building a rubegoldbergian
contraption and we're already inside an internal action API request
with a fake context.
Change-Id: I01daf8dc70b5751bc1e157fe598988cd5d3219e5
Per Manuel Arostegui in T263817#7033384. The limit is 5000.
(I picked it arbitrarily, there's no real rationale for it.)
Also log a warning when any user reaches half of the limit,
so that we might make a decision about changing this mechanism
before it starts affecting users. Maybe at that time we'll
have data to show that it's safe to remove the limit.
Bug: T263817
Change-Id: I18a8ee0ad7383759229c5721d5253fb591457d4d
Using `updateCacheExpiry()` in this way appears to be established
with examples of other use in WMF production such as:
- CategortyTree extension:
custom cache expiry for pages with `<categorytree>`.
- RSS extension:
custom cache expiry for pages with `<rss>`.
- intersection extension:
custom cache expiry for pages with `<DynamicPageList>`.
- Math extension:
custom cache expiry if `<math>` failed.
- Wikibase extension, Flow extension:
no caching for certain namespaces or content types.
- Graph extension, Kartographer extension:
via onParserAfterParse hook, no caching if on preview.
Bug: T280605
Change-Id: Iea41ab8599ffae4622c97d682258b1b64eaf9ba2
Previously we relied on the NamespaceInfo check below to reject
special pages, but after commit 07d885248bc54bdc0f12d9745916c794d45ec81c
in MediaWiki core, PageProps throws an exception when called with a
special page.
Bug: T281180
Depends-On: I32c94107fde96b9d6344c77b621be9b3b9b7faaf
Change-Id: I0fd893c63a6e92f6c84e7aa92270852e1137fcad
The issue occurred when replying to a comment consisting of multiple
list items, starting with a <dt> (instead of the expected <dd>), so
that the comment is considered to be unindented.
Modifier tried to add the reply directly inside the list (<dl>) rather
than inside the last list item (<dt>), which caused it to be confused
about indentation levels and try to un-indent more times than there
were indentations.
The simplest solution, given the existing code, is to add the reply
outside the list instead, in a new list. This results in a "list gap"
(<dl><dt>...</dt><dd>...</dd></dl><dl><dd>...</dd></dl>), but I think
it's acceptable for this rare case.
There are separate tests cases for old Parser and for Parsoid HTML,
because they parse the original wikitext differently (with the old
Parser producing HTML with a list gap too).
Bug: T279445
Change-Id: Ie0ee960e7090cf051ee547b480c980e9530eda51
The regexps needs to be non-greedy, otherwise it could swallow up a
large chunk of the page (up to the next comment).
I noticed this when adding tests for this code, in the 'unclosed-font'
test case (Ief9648b8805fadcc170c54b627eb669cc8b907b6).
Change-Id: I5f67a9599b0cb07bdd53abeebac9ada221181b66
If curLevel or desiredLevel are calculated incorrectly, this loop
could never end.
In JS, something would throw an exception before going infinite, but
PHP is happy to trot along despite accessing properties of null and
attaching multiple children to a document node.
Bug: T279445
Change-Id: I1784f550ec3a23dcded4f2b1def97e51cb414b7b
We added it because the initial designs for the subscribe action were
much easier to implement like this, and topic "containers" (T269950)
would have required it.
However, the latest design of the subscribe action will not need it
(T279149), and topic containers are still very far away, so let's
remove it for now.
Bug: T280433
Change-Id: I21a23e9bea43f24d265750926fbd62b99038d3f1
