The issue occurred when replying to a comment consisting of multiple
list items, starting with a <dt> (instead of the expected <dd>), so
that the comment is considered to be unindented.
Modifier tried to add the reply directly inside the list (<dl>) rather
than inside the last list item (<dt>), which caused it to be confused
about indentation levels and try to un-indent more times than there
were indentations.
The simplest solution, given the existing code, is to add the reply
outside the list instead, in a new list. This results in a "list gap"
(<dl><dt>...</dt><dd>...</dd></dl><dl><dd>...</dd></dl>), but I think
it's acceptable for this rare case.
There are separate tests cases for old Parser and for Parsoid HTML,
because they parse the original wikitext differently (with the old
Parser producing HTML with a list gap too).
Bug: T279445
Change-Id: Ie0ee960e7090cf051ee547b480c980e9530eda51
We added it because the initial designs for the subscribe action were
much easier to implement like this, and topic "containers" (T269950)
would have required it.
However, the latest design of the subscribe action will not need it
(T279149), and topic containers are still very far away, so let's
remove it for now.
Bug: T280433
Change-Id: I21a23e9bea43f24d265750926fbd62b99038d3f1
The existing comment IDs can't be used to find the same comment on
a different revision or page (when it's transcluded), because they
depend on the comment's parent and its position on the page.
Comment names depend only on the author and timestamp. The trade-off
is that they can't distinguish comments posted within the same minute,
or in the same edit, so we will still need the IDs sometimes.
Prefer using comment names when replying, if they're not ambiguous.
This fixes T273413 and T275821.
Heading names depend on the author and timestamp of the oldest comment.
This way we don't have to detect changes to the heading text, but we
can't distinguish headings without any comments.
Bug: T274685
Bug: T273413
Bug: T275821
Change-Id: Id85c50ba38d1e532cec106708c077b908a3fcd49
Longer, but follows the style guide and less likely to conflict.
We need to account for init classes in the cache being around for
a while.
Change-Id: I738bc93393850db320fdbda2b003ca8ac40556da
The code we're testing already produces a string of serialized HTML,
no need to parse and re-serialize it.
Also, we recently learned that the precise format matters here
(T274709), and now this test *actually* covers the fix for that bug.
Follow-up to 5b26e9664b.
As a downside, this test might now spuriously fail if the format of
the output of Parsoid's XMLSerializer changes. Hopefully that won't
happen too often.
Change-Id: I69b514f545e47dcb437fb39a83edb8e2f19ed99b
Now it detect signatures generated by en.wp's {{Undated}} template,
and signatures of people who do weird stuff to the timestamps.
Bug: T275938
Change-Id: I27b07f6786ca5433a3c02a5fe68e4716d41401bb
The horrendous 11-line if() condition did not correctly handle
signatures wrapped in inline formatting markup, like <small>.
Instead, implement this logic in the code for skipping to the end
of a paragraph, which didn't exist yet when that condition was
added, but seems like a much better place to check this now.
Bug: T275934
Change-Id: I5cccff889b5e15b5f8fde0538bf4bccb22e762cf
This code expected $container->firstChild to be a
<div class="mw-parser-output">, but that element is not present
when we're running on HTML to be saved in parser cache.
We ended up inserting the marker inside whatever node was the
first on the page, and if it was a <style> element, both our
marker and the styles would be lost when serializing, like in
6c7a0ca9a2.
When we're running on final HTML, the marker will now be outside
of <div class="mw-parser-output">, but that seems to be fine. Only
early versions of I4e60fdbc098c1a74757d6e60fec6bcf8e5db37c1 had
problems with that (see comments on patchset 41), but it works now.
The added test case also covers the fix for T274709.
Bug: T275440
Change-Id: I38d45dd8686919be51e1d307ded12b0afe185eb5
Top-level comments that start or end with a list (inconsistent
indentation) would not have triggered the logic for detecting
wrappers.
Bug: T273692
Change-Id: Idcb4eed73e391f5f86eca2eb05cb3cea0d86f30a
For a moment I doubted if we handle this case correctly, but in fact
I didn't botch that code *this* badly.
Change-Id: I5a9d142e4bd97ac40aa388bb43b65ab1286e3f18
Documentation:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:PHP_unit_testing/Writing_unit_tests_for_extensions#Two_types_of_tests
We can do this because the tested methods do not depend on any globals
or on MediaWiki being installed.
In addition to being the new hotness, MediaWikiUnitTestCase allows the
test classes that use it instead of MediaWikiTestCase to start up much
faster. In my testing, running this test case individually now takes
0.35s, compared to 1.1s before.
Try:
* With new code:
time php tests/phpunit/phpunit.php extensions/DiscussionTools/tests/phpunit/unit/CommentUtilsTest.php
* With old code:
time php tests/phpunit/phpunit.php extensions/DiscussionTools/tests/phpunit/CommentUtilsTest.php
Change-Id: I771b1f3d101a394ee869e42547d9ae7839397752
* Ignore rendering-transparent nodes between discussion comments.
* Improve isRenderingTransparentNode() so that <link> nodes
representing TemplateStyles are not considered transparent,
otherwise this would undo ae920b831f.
Using a regexp from Parsoid.
Bug: T272746
Change-Id: I0b3c3251156ba6c4826abf5ba44ea93f80ebc01d
Add yet another tree walking utility: CommentUtils::linearWalk().
Unlike TreeWalker, it allows handling the beginnings and ends of nodes
separately – kind of like parsing a XML token stream, or kind of like
VisualEditor's linear model.
(Add unit tests for this utility. The simple.html test case is copied
from [VisualEditor/VisualEditor]/demos/ve/pages/simple.html.)
Use this utility to stop skipping when we reach either a closing or
opening block node tag. Previously we'd skip over such tags inside
nested "transparent" nodes (like <a>, <del>, or apparently <font>).
Bug: T271385
Change-Id: I201a942eb3a56335e84d94e150ec2c33f8b4f4e0
As a result of 0fc71f60cd, "empty" text
nodes (containing only whitespace) at the end of the comment may be
inside the comment's range, and trying to ignore them caused the
ranges not to match and the frame not to be detected.
Now the code works whether they're inside the comment's range or not.
Add a test case for wrapped discussion comments with HTML comments and
with whitespace.
Bug: T250126
Bug: T268407
Change-Id: I2217ff5a635fd1c9c9e803f46795b1bfb3d17535
While working on T270009, I noticed that <style> and <link> nodes
are treated differently, which seemed weird. Rewrite this again,
hopefully this is the last time.
The changed test cases also involve <area> and <input> nodes,
and the new results make more sense to me.
Bug: T264116
Change-Id: I3af90c84768a4b3dc53446927f4dba6f72175a2f
