* Remove the existing approach for detecting signatures that only
worked in source mode; remove autoSignWikitext()
* Use the same approach for auto-signing in source mode as we have
already used in visual
* In both modes, detect whether the user has already typed a signature
at the end of their comment in the modifier, and if so, don't add a
signature
* Add test cases for the detection
Bug: T255738
Change-Id: I791d3035cb1ffc33ce3966d4617a25d08700c35b
This is a regression from when we added a wikitext parameter to
preparePreview. Calling getValue in visual mode converts the whole
DM to HTML, which is fairly expensive, especially as there are
no previews in visual mode.
Change-Id: Ieed61b0d7741e7204a942a7181923da0502981cd
* Run the 'wikipage.content' hook before our initialization.
This way collapsible elements and other changes to the page layout
are processed before we measure where the new reply is and try to
highlight and scroll it into view. (T252903)
* Remove the code dealing with 'mw-parser-output' and 'dt-init-done'.
This was needed to avoid initializing twice on the same element,
which can't happen now. (T254807)
This is much closer to the original approach Ed proposed in
I05a3c766668999f05cfe06473652429025595196 before I changed it:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/DiscussionTools/+/550693/7..8
Bug: T252903
Bug: T254807
Change-Id: Ibc3fcbd3c92c8eceda19b68cee9e69f6e92456f5
* Track editor mode switching between visual and source (plain)
* Track interactions with checkboxes
* Fix the tracking of firstChange when switching with content
Bug: T254291
Change-Id: I0e243e393b02952684f34dbbe1697633c0b2561a
When the preview loads, the "Reply" / "Cancel" buttons shift downwards,
which looks ugly. Try to wait for the preview before showing the source
editor interface.
Bug: T234403
Change-Id: I70989fb9fbcac17e1a0672eda8d34bf26003bb96
* Reset to content dir for preview.
* <textarea> gets dir from the `.sitedir-* textarea` rule.
* VE already sets the content dir in the editor.
Bug: T253255
Change-Id: I76df093490e86a730ccd5610c43c9b3fc7e07a54
Exceptions were being treated like API errors, resulting in the
incorrect message "Invalid response from server." being shown to the
user. Instead show the error message.
Bug: T252238
Change-Id: Idbaee7d2b710812673992d30a17a9b5fe856a5a6
This means we have an instance for each comment, which makes keeping
track of local variables much simpler, and will make switching out
the widgets easier.
Change-Id: I7584870225b1a14146852987d6a40ad05957387c
Extra lines currently render empty list items which are invisible.
Remove these as the user probably didn't intend from them to appear
in the wikiext.
Bug: T249867
Change-Id: I75c1192a94b918783d362d38cd91a508bb169d56
* When we discover the comment comes from a transcluded page, follow
the transclusion to find the source page. We follow transclusions
recursively, up to an arbitrary limit of 10.
* In the reply widget, display the title of the page where we will
save the reply, to avoid users confused why their edit won't show up
in the history. In the wikitext workflow this is done by redirecting
the user to the edited page at the end, but it seems less surprising
to stay on the current page.
* After saving the reply, we must purge the current page, otherwise
the new content will not be immediately visible on it.
Bug: T247535
Change-Id: I1c6631aa65a2fce6c1c2f0dd4a8c7aa6389caf94
This fixes a warning in the API: 'Property "modules" was set but not
"jsconfigvars" or "encodedjsconfigvars". Configuration variables are
necessary for proper module usage.'
We were already updating them when saving.
Change-Id: I3e16e3fd4b43a438c27645cca90517b6b4be7db7
If we can't use the native closest() due to lack of browser support,
then I'd rather have a simple loop that implements the functionality
we need, instead of a fallback to another native method with limited
browser support and experimental implementations.
Change-Id: I0bf84aa25fc398e329b533afb28317d19716d57a
We always pass the same arguments to the controller method and
two of those are global config values, so just pass the comment ID
each time it is used instead.
Change-Id: Ic68c70bdadb29310e930dd10fd6c6137d01ad22f
Sets the placeholder text to "Reply to <user>".
Bug: T245227
Depends-On: I7f3a58b7093d00aace9f9c6a95a121ba4e901ad8
Change-Id: Ie51f1848c17bb892e7f64adf6f7f19fc38e56202
The "Reply" buttons were active when viewing an old revision of the
page (&oldid=1234). This was probably unintentional, and it would undo
all more recent comments if you saved yours.
However, I think it would be a useful feature. You often end up
viewing old revisions when reviewing changes to pages from your
watchlist or email notifications.
Now, when the reply widget is launched from an old revision, it will
try to find the relevant parent comment in the latest revision of the
page, and edit that revision when inserting the reply. If the parent
comment is gone, it shows a useful error message.
Bug: T235761
Change-Id: I8c5b631d3bfb62196fd219cbcd7d497408d187a7
The most common case of edit conflicts on talk pages is several people
responding to the same comment at the same time.[citation needed]
We can easily resolve this case by fetching the latest revision of the
page and re-running our code to insert a reply on it.
When we can't insert a reply, that probably means the parent comment
was deleted or moved, so display an error message indicating that
instead of the generic one.
Bug: T240643
Change-Id: Ic686acc747580d46779960211a02e9830a6ae86f
Previously, we only built the Parsoid document once (on page load) and
kept it around forever. Every time we tried to post a reply, it was
added to this document, even if it wasn't saved due to some error.
This resulted in duplicate replies when the user managed to actually
save.
Now we only keep around the HTML string and some metadata fetched from
the API, and rebuild the actual document every time before adding a
reply.
Bug: T245333
Change-Id: Ib1c344a7d613cdf67644aa243147c5e699c2c1e7
Sepatate #teardown and #tryTeardown methods to make it
obvious what they do. Have <escape> call #tryTeardown
like the cancel button.
Change-Id: Ica0f3295bfee378bcd15d0b6a3ccea3c7917ad9b
* Add config option $wgDiscussionToolsUseVisualEditor (default false).
* Add new modules ext.discussionTools.ReplyWidgetPlain and ...ReplyWidgetVisual,
replacing ...ReplyWidget. Load only one of them depending on the config.
TODO:
* Also add the visual mode of VisualEditor, this only uses NWE now.
There is already code to support saving from it, but no mode
switcher tool
Co-Authored-By: Ed Sanders <esanders@wikimedia.org>
Co-Authored-By: Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I9b6db865d51baf400fb715dc7aa68ccd8cdd4905
I did this wrong in a6147ffac8, the
'dt-init-done' class was never cleared. Put it on another element.
Bug: T241861
Change-Id: I136bd9c12bcc80cff01f5d26a8a53524f0c533c6
Unfortunately mw.Api#parse doesn't provide us with that part of the
response, so we have to manually construct the parameters.
Bug: T241193
Change-Id: Ie91d5ebc2ef483a69524b838dd3cb852e7c85cd2
And actually discard the contents when they confirm.
For now this uses the generic editor message, but that can
be tweaked later.
Bug: T240271
Change-Id: I2dfa19b2cc7ac49d7efea37ac8c9429c75934a91
The packageFiles system makes it easier to export site config data
from PHP to JS, which we need a lot of, but it's awkward when mixing
it with defining and accessing classes via a namespace like mw.dt.
The only thing remaining in mw.dt is mw.dt.pageThreads, which is
described to be "for debugging", so we should keep it easy to type.
Also we still use the namespace for documenting classes.
Everything else can be reached by require()'ing a ResourceLoader
module, for example instead of `mw.dt.ui.ReplyWidget`
you'd do `require( 'ext.discussionTools.ReplyWidget' )`.
(When debugging from browser console, use `mw.loader.require` instead.)
Change-Id: I6496abcf58c21658d6fd0f3fc1db1f7380a89df7
Possible use cases:
* Matching comments between PHP and Parsoid HTML [implemented here]
* Finding the same comment in a different revision of a page
(e.g. while resolving an edit conflict, or to allow resuming
composition of autosaved comments) [implemented for highlighting
user's own posted comment only]
* Permanent links to comments [future]
The reasoning for this form of ID is:
* _Timestamp_ by itself is a nearly unique identifier, so it's a good
thing to start with
* Users may post multiple comments in one edit (or in many edits in
one minute), so we need the _sequential number_ to distinguish them
* _Username_ is probably not required, but it may reduce the need
for sequential numbers, and will help with human-readability if we
add permanent links
The ID remains stable when a new comment is added anywhere by anyone
(excepts comments within the same minute by the same user), or when a
section is renamed.
It's not always stable when a comment is moved or when an entire
section is moved or deleted (archived), but you can't have everything.
Change-Id: Idaae6427d659d12b82e37f1791bd03833632c7c0
