When our interface initialized on a page that the current user
recently edited (using the reply tool, the full-page source editor,
or any other way), check if any new automatic topic subscriptions
were added and update the interface to reflect that.
This requires doing some API requests after the page is loaded,
because adding auto-subscriptions happens asynchronously in a
DeferredUpdate (potentially after the user is already viewing
the page with their comment saved), and depends on the contents
of the edit.
(When using the reply tool, we could avoid this API request and
replicate the logic, but that's not implemented in this commit
to keep it simple.)
Bug: T284836
Change-Id: Ic0fabda0de4ebbc5e424f49641e6b03ebb4b7e6a
This is the minimal fix, they still look out of place, but they don't
break layout of the whole page.
Bug: T292241
Change-Id: I1538962dd266fb455051e4dfe2680e47c4d1bb4c
* Use featuresEnabled.newtopictool to decide when new topic
links might exist on the page, instead of relying on
`#ca-addsection` existing. Change the logic of that feature
flag to check if __NONEWSECTIONLINK__ is on the page.
* Render the add-topic button locally in a hook to replace
the one suppressed by onMinervaNeueTalkPageOverlay. Do so
whenever the newtopictool feature is enabled (see above).
Bug: T270537
Change-Id: I3e3f7403b3b86bb84fcb75a8833919512519b70f
Notifications are bundled by section, so instead of linking to the
comment, link to the section.
Additionally, add a parameter to the URL listing all the comment IDs
from the bundle, and highlight them all and scroll to the topmost one.
Having to handle both URL fragments and URL query parameters makes
this code kind of a mess :(
Also, some unexpected changes became necessary:
* EventDispatcher.php: Store the section title in events using
HeadingItem::getLinkableTitle() instead of ThreadItem::getText().
The result is mostly the same, except in case of wacky markup like
images or extension tags. We can more reliably use it to link to the
section on the page, and we already use getLinkableTitle() when
generating edit summaries in the reply tool for this reason.
* dt.init.less: Change the mix-blend-mode for the highlights from
'multiply' to 'darken', so that multiple overlapping highlights do
not look more opaque. This affects how the highlights look on
non-white backgrounds and images (they're less blue, and on darker
backgrounds entirely invisible), but it seems worth it.
Bug: T286620
Change-Id: I21bb5c003abc2747f0350d3f3af558dfb55693e9
This includes the dtrepliedto URL functionality from
I3f81e4d77faed367606e47678b8896051982359d.
Bug: T274831
Bug: T274832
Bug: T277329
Change-Id: I035d04f30c8312b0cb42902d3bf940df1482ffb3
Previously, our highlights were placed in a node at the end of
the page, and positioned absolutely in relation to the whole
page. Now we insert the highlight in the DOM near the comment,
and position it in relation to that.
This way it remains positioned correctly when the page shifts
(e.g. collapsing the table of contents), and disappears when
the page content is hidden (e.g. opening visual editor).
Bug: T281471
Change-Id: I60afc4b94b2e23376105638542563e595a1811d9
We added it because the initial designs for the subscribe action were
much easier to implement like this, and topic "containers" (T269950)
would have required it.
However, the latest design of the subscribe action will not need it
(T279149), and topic containers are still very far away, so let's
remove it for now.
Bug: T280433
Change-Id: I21a23e9bea43f24d265750926fbd62b99038d3f1
Longer, but follows the style guide and less likely to conflict.
We need to account for init classes in the cache being around for
a while.
Change-Id: I738bc93393850db320fdbda2b003ca8ac40556da
* Use a slightly different color
* Use 'mix-blend-mode: multiply' when available to avoid fading
the text color
* Add fade-in animation and make fade-out animation slower
Bug: T268994
Change-Id: I210ed4fd55c3dc184d13daf915fa93bee3699ad5
Through trial and error, I found that adding `display: inline-flex;`
avoids the issue, and does not seem to have any negative effects in
Chromium or other browsers.
Bug: T260072
Change-Id: I9a9ca1fdb57bb7dd6c1a0a70e330a2a503c8ec8e
Otherwise the rest of the page may shift if hiding the link changes
line-wrapping. It felt super confusing when it happened to me while
I was testing an unrelated thing.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F31254175
Change-Id: I53aecdbf3bfba579b48875532d251de0f1c81d6c
