https://wikipesija.org is currently using ISO 8601 as the default date
format. The format is xnY-xnm-xnd"T"xnH:xni:xns and 'xn', 'm', and 's'
need support added.
Change-Id: I235098a578eb92ddd23ea47fa23d60df4b28f590
* Add @var comments to untyped getService() calls so IDEs and tools
are able to understand where the callers are.
* Use the more specific IReadableDatabase where possible.
* Fix missing import.
Change-Id: I9c1153cb9fe872227753628a947f40bd5ee447fa
Special:DiscussionToolsDebug falsely promised that the API delivers
the same information, but in fact the API included the signatures in
each comment's HTML unconditionally. Allow excluding them.
Change-Id: Ie1e38d28bed0b6d5713d9051b84cc08a23da94c2
Also merge setMwGlobals() calls because they are really expensive.
Also utilize the more readable str_contains() and related.
Change-Id: Iebde6aa17c2e366f0c0a98fe13a454f6a06c299b
Unsubscribing was already available from Special:TopicSubscriptions
when JavaScript is disabled.
* Add links to subscribe/unsubscribe in CommentFormatter
* Update links in skin navigation
* Add support for subscribing in the actions
Bug: T321431
Change-Id: If3c4bf7df309d0d98237c3b7b9c129cc2f72cda3
This can be done within sections using CSS:
* mw-notalk
Or at a page level using a magic word:
* __NOTALK__
"notalk" suppresses all comment detection, treating the content as
not containing any comments even if there are signatures present.
Bug: T295553
Bug: T249293
Change-Id: Ic1d7294bafcf7071e16838e70684ecadd7bc6fd3
This can be done within sections using CSS:
* mw-archivedtalk
Or at a page level using a magic word:
* __ARCHIVEDTALK__
"archivedtalk" still detects the comments, but disables features
as appropriate for an archived conversion, i.e. the reply tool.
Bug: T295553
Bug: T249293
Change-Id: Ic47693e9a2f53f92563ccdd50203fb55c12d0493
In local testing, this reduces the amount of data loaded by
Special:JavaScriptTest from 27 MB to 20 MB.
Change-Id: I37f0f677751031cc965d1921a62871154bbe9201
We started using marker comments (HTML comments with special content
inserted into the page) for the reply buttons back in the day, because
we needed to indicate their location in the HTML. Later we used the
same idea for things which aren't actually tied to a specific location
in the HTML, such as boolean data like __DTEMPTYTALKPAGE__. There is a
better way to do this.
This commit stop writing the HTML comments, which are no longer used,
and cleans up the tests.
Bug: T328980
Change-Id: I37541356830945cc9abcc79d4c445ff6f2449759
(cherry picked from commit ab40ef62c0)
This reverts commit ab40ef62c0.
Reason for revert: this was supposed to be merged later; revert it now and reapply in a bit
Change-Id: I7a1107143121f1f50bf25cb7a239cf9a76293d01
We started using marker comments (HTML comments with special content
inserted into the page) for the reply buttons back in the day, because
we needed to indicate their location in the HTML. Later we used the
same idea for things which aren't actually tied to a specific location
in the HTML, such as boolean data like __DTEMPTYTALKPAGE__. There is a
better way to do this.
This commit stop writing the HTML comments, which are no longer used,
and cleans up the tests.
Bug: T328980
Change-Id: Ic0d336dfbeb932134ec94bc0e86bc2a26921d440
Instead of generating the TOC HTML additions immediately, store
the data we need using ParserOutput::setExtensionData(), and use
the OutputPageParserOutput hook to fetch it and generate the HTML.
We check that the stored data is present before using it to avoid
issues with cached ParserOutput objects.
Bug: T328122
Change-Id: I7d4988cd568f10b7995a4d744e0ec6e7ce081b0e
ParserOutput::getTOCHTML() is being deprecated, and all skins are now
generating the TOC from the TOCData returned by
ParserOutput::getTOCData(). The SHOW_TOC flag was introduced in core
to determine if the TOC should be shown, but Vector-2022 *may* begin to
use other heuristics to determine whether to show the TOC (T315862).
We're conservatively going to process the TOC as long as there is
TOC present to process.
Bug: T328072
Change-Id: I38b439c6752157dbee9b09c9f5443a740dbaabf4
Change code to match the documented consensus formed on T321683:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Coding_conventions/PHP#Exception_handling
* Do not directly throw Exception, Error or MWException
* Document checked exceptions with @throws
* Do not document unchecked exceptions
For this extension, I think it makes sense to consider DOMException an
unchecked exception too (in addition to the usual LogicException and
RuntimeException).
Depends-On: Id07e301c3f20afa135e5469ee234a27354485652
Depends-On: I869af06896b9757af18488b916211c5a41a8c563
Depends-On: I42d9b7465d1406a22ef1b3f6d8de426c60c90e2c
Change-Id: Ic9d9efd031a87fa5a93143f714f0adb20f0dd956
We verify that they appear in the action=parse API output.
We should also have a test to verify that they appear in the Vector
2022 skin, but that might have to be done as a browser test.
Bug: T326677
Change-Id: I81d5ddecd3b244aeee8cba71498f4d65f8e53696
The alias stored in the language files is with underscores,
but the value is compared in CommentParser against text with spaces
Affected languages: bjn, hu, id, jv, kaa, tl, tpi, vi, war
Bug: T327021
Change-Id: I8626627d10a240973e631e24508937a9eee9fb14
Test ServiceWiring.php using tests copied from CentralAuth. Because
phpunit does not support marking a file as covered, the ServiceWiring
file is ignored for code coverage as the tests fully cover the file.
Change-Id: I7da8d74fec84a5aa9c77bc0678ad8f55b550893a
* Detect comment separators at the end of comments too
* Consider TemplateStyles associated with ignored templates
This unexpectedly improves a lot of cases other than T313097 too,
mostly where <br> or {{outdent}} was used within a paragraph:
splitting comments that were previously jumbled together, or restoring
content that was previously ignored for apps / notifications.
Bug: T313097
Change-Id: I9b2ef6b760f2ffd97141ad7000f70919aeab7803
ApiDiscussionToolsPageInfo and ApiDiscussionToolsCompare in direct parsoid
or VRS modes tries to fetch HTML using VisualEditor thus stashing the
HTML gotten which we don't want, we only need it for viewing in these cases.
This seems like something that was/is already happening in RESTBase. So for
APIs in DiscussionTools that need the HTML for viewing, just get it from
parser cache and not stash it.
Bug: T323357
Change-Id: I101c1e84739a2ac1f562f2f7bdc4b8f53d9f3b23
When a comment almost exactly matches the range of an
accidental complex transclusion consisting only of
pages from the 'Template' namespace and wikitext fragments,
I think we can safely allow replying to the comment.
Even if this turns out to be incorrect in some cases,
the failure will be more graceful after the changes in T313100:
instead of potentially duplicating contents from a template,
the worst case now is that the reply will appear in the wrong
place (at the end of the transclusion).
Bug: T313093
Change-Id: Ie8da09d74a652d893fd8c3e2435ef6cb70fad64a