https://wikipesija.org is currently using ISO 8601 as the default date
format. The format is xnY-xnm-xnd"T"xnH:xni:xns and 'xn', 'm', and 's'
need support added.
Change-Id: I235098a578eb92ddd23ea47fa23d60df4b28f590
* Add @var comments to untyped getService() calls so IDEs and tools
are able to understand where the callers are.
* Use the more specific IReadableDatabase where possible.
* Fix missing import.
Change-Id: I9c1153cb9fe872227753628a947f40bd5ee447fa
Special:DiscussionToolsDebug falsely promised that the API delivers
the same information, but in fact the API included the signatures in
each comment's HTML unconditionally. Allow excluding them.
Change-Id: Ie1e38d28bed0b6d5713d9051b84cc08a23da94c2
Also merge setMwGlobals() calls because they are really expensive.
Also utilize the more readable str_contains() and related.
Change-Id: Iebde6aa17c2e366f0c0a98fe13a454f6a06c299b
Unsubscribing was already available from Special:TopicSubscriptions
when JavaScript is disabled.
* Add links to subscribe/unsubscribe in CommentFormatter
* Update links in skin navigation
* Add support for subscribing in the actions
Bug: T321431
Change-Id: If3c4bf7df309d0d98237c3b7b9c129cc2f72cda3
This can be done within sections using CSS:
* mw-notalk
Or at a page level using a magic word:
* __NOTALK__
"notalk" suppresses all comment detection, treating the content as
not containing any comments even if there are signatures present.
Bug: T295553
Bug: T249293
Change-Id: Ic1d7294bafcf7071e16838e70684ecadd7bc6fd3
This can be done within sections using CSS:
* mw-archivedtalk
Or at a page level using a magic word:
* __ARCHIVEDTALK__
"archivedtalk" still detects the comments, but disables features
as appropriate for an archived conversion, i.e. the reply tool.
Bug: T295553
Bug: T249293
Change-Id: Ic47693e9a2f53f92563ccdd50203fb55c12d0493
In local testing, this reduces the amount of data loaded by
Special:JavaScriptTest from 27 MB to 20 MB.
Change-Id: I37f0f677751031cc965d1921a62871154bbe9201
We started using marker comments (HTML comments with special content
inserted into the page) for the reply buttons back in the day, because
we needed to indicate their location in the HTML. Later we used the
same idea for things which aren't actually tied to a specific location
in the HTML, such as boolean data like __DTEMPTYTALKPAGE__. There is a
better way to do this.
This commit stop writing the HTML comments, which are no longer used,
and cleans up the tests.
Bug: T328980
Change-Id: I37541356830945cc9abcc79d4c445ff6f2449759
(cherry picked from commit ab40ef62c0)
This reverts commit ab40ef62c0.
Reason for revert: this was supposed to be merged later; revert it now and reapply in a bit
Change-Id: I7a1107143121f1f50bf25cb7a239cf9a76293d01
We started using marker comments (HTML comments with special content
inserted into the page) for the reply buttons back in the day, because
we needed to indicate their location in the HTML. Later we used the
same idea for things which aren't actually tied to a specific location
in the HTML, such as boolean data like __DTEMPTYTALKPAGE__. There is a
better way to do this.
This commit stop writing the HTML comments, which are no longer used,
and cleans up the tests.
Bug: T328980
Change-Id: Ic0d336dfbeb932134ec94bc0e86bc2a26921d440
Instead of generating the TOC HTML additions immediately, store
the data we need using ParserOutput::setExtensionData(), and use
the OutputPageParserOutput hook to fetch it and generate the HTML.
We check that the stored data is present before using it to avoid
issues with cached ParserOutput objects.
Bug: T328122
Change-Id: I7d4988cd568f10b7995a4d744e0ec6e7ce081b0e
ParserOutput::getTOCHTML() is being deprecated, and all skins are now
generating the TOC from the TOCData returned by
ParserOutput::getTOCData(). The SHOW_TOC flag was introduced in core
to determine if the TOC should be shown, but Vector-2022 *may* begin to
use other heuristics to determine whether to show the TOC (T315862).
We're conservatively going to process the TOC as long as there is
TOC present to process.
Bug: T328072
Change-Id: I38b439c6752157dbee9b09c9f5443a740dbaabf4
Change code to match the documented consensus formed on T321683:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Coding_conventions/PHP#Exception_handling
* Do not directly throw Exception, Error or MWException
* Document checked exceptions with @throws
* Do not document unchecked exceptions
For this extension, I think it makes sense to consider DOMException an
unchecked exception too (in addition to the usual LogicException and
RuntimeException).
Depends-On: Id07e301c3f20afa135e5469ee234a27354485652
Depends-On: I869af06896b9757af18488b916211c5a41a8c563
Depends-On: I42d9b7465d1406a22ef1b3f6d8de426c60c90e2c
Change-Id: Ic9d9efd031a87fa5a93143f714f0adb20f0dd956
We verify that they appear in the action=parse API output.
We should also have a test to verify that they appear in the Vector
2022 skin, but that might have to be done as a browser test.
Bug: T326677
Change-Id: I81d5ddecd3b244aeee8cba71498f4d65f8e53696
The alias stored in the language files is with underscores,
but the value is compared in CommentParser against text with spaces
Affected languages: bjn, hu, id, jv, kaa, tl, tpi, vi, war
Bug: T327021
Change-Id: I8626627d10a240973e631e24508937a9eee9fb14
Test ServiceWiring.php using tests copied from CentralAuth. Because
phpunit does not support marking a file as covered, the ServiceWiring
file is ignored for code coverage as the tests fully cover the file.
Change-Id: I7da8d74fec84a5aa9c77bc0678ad8f55b550893a
* Detect comment separators at the end of comments too
* Consider TemplateStyles associated with ignored templates
This unexpectedly improves a lot of cases other than T313097 too,
mostly where <br> or {{outdent}} was used within a paragraph:
splitting comments that were previously jumbled together, or restoring
content that was previously ignored for apps / notifications.
Bug: T313097
Change-Id: I9b2ef6b760f2ffd97141ad7000f70919aeab7803
ApiDiscussionToolsPageInfo and ApiDiscussionToolsCompare in direct parsoid
or VRS modes tries to fetch HTML using VisualEditor thus stashing the
HTML gotten which we don't want, we only need it for viewing in these cases.
This seems like something that was/is already happening in RESTBase. So for
APIs in DiscussionTools that need the HTML for viewing, just get it from
parser cache and not stash it.
Bug: T323357
Change-Id: I101c1e84739a2ac1f562f2f7bdc4b8f53d9f3b23
When a comment almost exactly matches the range of an
accidental complex transclusion consisting only of
pages from the 'Template' namespace and wikitext fragments,
I think we can safely allow replying to the comment.
Even if this turns out to be incorrect in some cases,
the failure will be more graceful after the changes in T313100:
instead of potentially duplicating contents from a template,
the worst case now is that the reply will appear in the wrong
place (at the end of the transclusion).
Bug: T313093
Change-Id: Ie8da09d74a652d893fd8c3e2435ef6cb70fad64a
We wrap a `<div>` tag around the `<h2>`, and move some elements there.
The markup is inspired by and compatible with my proposal for T13555.
The "ext-discussiontools-init-section" class is moved to the `<div>`.
A small patch is needed in MobileFrontend to preserve the section
collapsing functionality: I11bff21e81046898ca63f3f432797129fa70ad88.
The following elements are now outside of `<h2>`:
* Metadata bar
* Subscribe button
* Ellipsis menu (only shown on mobile)
The following elements are sadly still inside of `<h2>`:
* Subscribe links (only shown on desktop)
* Section edit links from MediaWiki core
Trying to move them mucks up the CSS too much. I hope we can resolve
this later as a part of the work on T13555.
Depends-On: I11bff21e81046898ca63f3f432797129fa70ad88
Bug: T314714
Change-Id: I0bbdcfa02c334858737855349d7a35746de1d8f2
This is a better way than a loop in the test code.
When using DISCUSSIONTOOLS_OVERWRITE_TESTS, if both desktop and mobile
cases fail, both will be updated now. Previously the first failed
assertion would stop the test after only updating one file.
Change-Id: I4ce6f45b047e02c9f00024a9e5057adcb0e28047
Just to confirm that this works correctly, because I broke it a few
times in different ways while working on T321121.
In this scenario, discussiontools_item_revisions contains rows for
the oldest and newest revisions of pages containing each comment
distinguishable by name, as well as extra rows for the newest
revisions of comments indistinguishable by name, so that they can
be looked up by ID.
Change-Id: Ic8450a6b082ed343dd633d3a43c50696b5d6d2bb
Use revision IDs to break the tie, consistently with MediaWiki (see
RevisionStore::getRelativeRevision) instead of assuming that the
revision we're processing now is somehow both older *and* newer than
the other one (the mind boggles how that ever made sense to me).
Change-Id: I9f1a07124301a36be68578d908353b72f0442c00
discussiontools_item_pages row itp_id=5 has incorrect
itp_oldest_revision_id. It should point to the older of the two
revisions with the same time, but it points to the newer one.
discussiontools_item_revisions row is missing.
Depends-On: I56f0e161e5438d5f77b7d53d4db7411f90f97d05
Change-Id: I61ed42515891a84729455a7a32c98276c7cacd40
The changes from I39f9b994ce5636d70fea2e935a7c87c7d56dcb26 also make
most of the broken tests pass again.
Change-Id: I165f36235b47dee4bcef115e518bc1e81d2f83a5
We originally used 'templates' because it seemed like an obvious
choice for HTML files, and because 'packageFiles' requires extra code
to include anything that isn't a .js or .json file.
However, the templates are expected to be HTML fragments rather than
whole documents, and they are parsed in a particular way that takes a
lot of code to clean up (which we needed to do, because we use the
same test files for testing PHP code).
I tried doing it in the 'packageFiles' way, and the extra code doesn't
seem that bad in comparison after all. Moreover, the 'templates'
mechanism (when used the intended way) feels vaguely deprecated in
favor of Vue.js, and I'd rather move away from it.
This makes the tests faster too (probably mostly thanks to the removal
of the clean up code) – on my machine they go from 1800ms to 1500ms.
(Simplify linearWalk tests, as we no longer need to do weird things
with document fragments to get consistent outputs in PHP and JS.)
Change-Id: I39f9b994ce5636d70fea2e935a7c87c7d56dcb26
This fixes tests in modifier.test.js. The old parser tests
in parser.test.js are currently skipped.
Change-Id: If1fa8055b3cb6c6b43420ab40dd51af79fa083d9
Exposes that the old parser tests are asserting 0 comments added.
The tests are passing becaause testUtils.getThreadContainer returns
the empty string for both actual and expected.
Change-Id: I263a258a8db5c35a6fb1fc5ce281f902fc543038
Many methods are covered indirectly, and using method-level
@covers filters means these are reported as not being covered.
Change-Id: I94eb3e8c48209ff0b6bfc09e18c93555bb167e8f
The implementation in Parser doesn't descend into sub-thread.
Re-use the getThreadSummary method in ThreadItem and traverse
the thread properly.
Bug: T298617
Change-Id: I318d9012eb83f37ccbe463923524ef2e9f995ced
This changes a vast number of test expected-outputs because it affects
the order of the keys when serialized.
Bug: T315400
Change-Id: I6ad2cded6ba7cb2cc5e5ba37ea60f4b18ecc26be
