This is a better way than a loop in the test code.
When using DISCUSSIONTOOLS_OVERWRITE_TESTS, if both desktop and mobile
cases fail, both will be updated now. Previously the first failed
assertion would stop the test after only updating one file.
Change-Id: I4ce6f45b047e02c9f00024a9e5057adcb0e28047
Just to confirm that this works correctly, because I broke it a few
times in different ways while working on T321121.
In this scenario, discussiontools_item_revisions contains rows for
the oldest and newest revisions of pages containing each comment
distinguishable by name, as well as extra rows for the newest
revisions of comments indistinguishable by name, so that they can
be looked up by ID.
Change-Id: Ic8450a6b082ed343dd633d3a43c50696b5d6d2bb
Use revision IDs to break the tie, consistently with MediaWiki (see
RevisionStore::getRelativeRevision) instead of assuming that the
revision we're processing now is somehow both older *and* newer than
the other one (the mind boggles how that ever made sense to me).
Change-Id: I9f1a07124301a36be68578d908353b72f0442c00
discussiontools_item_pages row itp_id=5 has incorrect
itp_oldest_revision_id. It should point to the older of the two
revisions with the same time, but it points to the newer one.
discussiontools_item_revisions row is missing.
Depends-On: I56f0e161e5438d5f77b7d53d4db7411f90f97d05
Change-Id: I61ed42515891a84729455a7a32c98276c7cacd40
The changes from I39f9b994ce5636d70fea2e935a7c87c7d56dcb26 also make
most of the broken tests pass again.
Change-Id: I165f36235b47dee4bcef115e518bc1e81d2f83a5
We originally used 'templates' because it seemed like an obvious
choice for HTML files, and because 'packageFiles' requires extra code
to include anything that isn't a .js or .json file.
However, the templates are expected to be HTML fragments rather than
whole documents, and they are parsed in a particular way that takes a
lot of code to clean up (which we needed to do, because we use the
same test files for testing PHP code).
I tried doing it in the 'packageFiles' way, and the extra code doesn't
seem that bad in comparison after all. Moreover, the 'templates'
mechanism (when used the intended way) feels vaguely deprecated in
favor of Vue.js, and I'd rather move away from it.
This makes the tests faster too (probably mostly thanks to the removal
of the clean up code) – on my machine they go from 1800ms to 1500ms.
(Simplify linearWalk tests, as we no longer need to do weird things
with document fragments to get consistent outputs in PHP and JS.)
Change-Id: I39f9b994ce5636d70fea2e935a7c87c7d56dcb26
This fixes tests in modifier.test.js. The old parser tests
in parser.test.js are currently skipped.
Change-Id: If1fa8055b3cb6c6b43420ab40dd51af79fa083d9
Exposes that the old parser tests are asserting 0 comments added.
The tests are passing becaause testUtils.getThreadContainer returns
the empty string for both actual and expected.
Change-Id: I263a258a8db5c35a6fb1fc5ce281f902fc543038
Many methods are covered indirectly, and using method-level
@covers filters means these are reported as not being covered.
Change-Id: I94eb3e8c48209ff0b6bfc09e18c93555bb167e8f
The implementation in Parser doesn't descend into sub-thread.
Re-use the getThreadSummary method in ThreadItem and traverse
the thread properly.
Bug: T298617
Change-Id: I318d9012eb83f37ccbe463923524ef2e9f995ced
This changes a vast number of test expected-outputs because it affects
the order of the keys when serialized.
Bug: T315400
Change-Id: I6ad2cded6ba7cb2cc5e5ba37ea60f4b18ecc26be
