To avoid old threads re-appearing on popular pages when someone
uses a vague title (e.g. dozens of threads titled "question" on
[[Wikipedia:Help desk]]: https://w.wiki/fbN), include the oldest
timestamp in the thread (i.e. date the thread was started) in the
heading ID.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: If918bfd5e025248923d1939bc86916697ead95a0
Sequential numbers aren't great because they change when an earlier
comment is archived. Parent comment/heading IDs should change less
often.
This also makes much more sense for disambiguating subsections,
e.g. a dozen identical ===Votes=== sections for a dozen proposals.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I466454984fd919ebef35f2b37ddb5d86dc842996
Our threads now also contain all replies to their sub-threads.
This is similar to how sections work in MediaWiki, where the parent
section also contains the content of all the lower-level sections.
We're going to need this for notifications about replies in a thread.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I241fc58e2088a7555942824b0f184ed21e3a8b6f
Previously, only comments could have IDs, because we only needed IDs
for replying. But we might also use them for notifications soon.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I1bcad02bf17ab54bc5028a959543c10f0430836b
I haven't really reviewed the outputs, but at least a) they don't
crash b) they will fail if the output suddenly changes (which could
cause problems due to caching).
Bug: T252555
Change-Id: I1bbcbc5dd17ce1e24b3622062f5e8df4baf5f389
Also, add tests covering this and the previous bug fixes in this code
(T259818, T261706).
Note that the test data added in tests/cases/ doesn't exactly match
the entire configuration of the wiki, only the parts we want to cover.
This is unlike the data in tests/data/, which was literally copied
from the relevant wikis, and which is used as input for other tests.
Bug: T265500
Change-Id: I29a59a5952f6dc9fb5910434bb6bcc9dcdaa01a9
The wikitext parser outputs `<p><br></p>` for empty paragraphs, so we
need to ignore `<br>` tags when searching for an "interesting" node
that marks the beginning of a comment. Otherwise the empty paragraphs
mess up the detection of indentation levels.
Bug: T264116
Change-Id: I84a97ab577baa7336b78935ccdc48041ecfc231a
The tests pass either way because this trivial difference is ignored,
but it's annoying when trying to update changed tests.
Change-Id: I7ad1acad43e30a63843cfda4d0d08ff663ef3252
This is primarily to cover the handling of localised digits,
which previously wasn't being tested, leading to T261706.
Bug: T261706
Change-Id: I9de7f01f77e767e9048c85604b559af4bca0de91
When a comment ended before the end of a paragraph, the next
comment would begin right there in the middle of the paragraph.
This could result in the detected indentation level of that
comment being incorrect, and replies being inserted in wrong
places, as seen in the 'signatures-funny' test case.
The code moved to the parser was previously repeated twice in
addListItem() and addReplyLink(), which should have been a hint
that something isn't quite right.
Also, fix the code guarding against overlapping signatures,
now that signatures may not be at the end of a comment.
Bug: T260855
Change-Id: Ic26a87642f8a15d5de2f7073d4d8176b299c7f94
Expand the 'signatures-funny' test case with more examples, which
don't behave correctly.
Follow-up commits I04a8ea09401e06f2d4bb1f226f17eb528b29ed95 and
Ic26a87642f8a15d5de2f7073d4d8176b299c7f94 fix them.
Bug: T255738
Change-Id: I0fdd8bdf11b497ffeed37c37953c5730f6e4f3b7
Previously, parser would output offsets that don't exist in their
containers, because we were pretending that entities are parts of
their neighboring text nodes.
Turns out it's much easier to do it right when going backwards.
Change-Id: I9bccca2d403f1a976ae517449989170cdd99721e
When adding a reply, we take a node at the end of the previous comment,
compare that comment's indentation level to the expected indentation level
of the reply, and add (or remove) that number of wrapper lists.
The existing code did not consider that comments may have lists within
them, and so the indentation of that node may not match the indentation
of the comment.
Bug: T252702
Change-Id: Icc5ff19783d2b213bff99f283cb0599a8b5c1ab4
Previously we preferred that, but used '*' (<ul><li>) when the parent
comment or the previous reply also used it.
Bug: T252708
Change-Id: I3abf606da6693905764f1be745fad999fdf57fbe
This is similar to the code we already have in JS tests, but instead
of printing to the console where you have to copy-paste from, it just
overwrites the files.
Also, update all of the expected results by this method.
Changes in the expected outputs:
* In JSON files, the "warnings" are now always in the same place
regardless of the type of the warning.
* In all HTML files, self-closing tags now include the trailing slash,
some characters are no longer encoded as entities when not necessary,
and attributes may be single-quoted when that makes them shorter.
* In Parsoid HTML files, the header is no longer terribly mangled.
Other notes:
* CommentParserTest.php: Change the output of serializeComments()
to be in similar order as in JS, to reduce the diffs in this commit
and because it's a better order for humans.
* modifier.test.js: Remove some hacks that were working around small
inconsistencies between the previous expected outputs and the actual
outputs.
Change-Id: I9f764640dae823321c0ac35898fa4db03f1ca364
* Remove the existing approach for detecting signatures that only
worked in source mode; remove autoSignWikitext()
* Use the same approach for auto-signing in source mode as we have
already used in visual
* In both modes, detect whether the user has already typed a signature
at the end of their comment in the modifier, and if so, don't add a
signature
* Add test cases for the detection
Bug: T255738
Change-Id: I791d3035cb1ffc33ce3966d4617a25d08700c35b
The expected HTML was wrong, a '<br />' tag inside 'data-mw' was
somehow turned into '<br ></span>'. No idea how that happened.
Something must be wrong with the HTML parsing in JS tests, which
were used to generate this file.
Change-Id: I69caa68fe70e706df81e8adf29889254704f601e
When there is a wrapper element whose range matches the range of
a comment, any replies will now be added outside of that wrapper,
instead of directly after the comment (inside the wrapper).
Bug: T250126
Change-Id: I6b42c4db019ae998e91eebd324f9cbd2aa791b4f
It was useful when I was debugging those parts of the code, but now
it's usually annoying.
The warnings can still sometimes be useful for understanding how the
tool parses some discussion, though. To keep that functionality, add
displaying warnings for each comment in the debug mode.
Change-Id: I2d218a8a394f179bcc0990ff988a0567c275ccf2
