Sequential numbers aren't great because they change when an earlier
comment is archived. Parent comment/heading IDs should change less
often.
This also makes much more sense for disambiguating subsections,
e.g. a dozen identical ===Votes=== sections for a dozen proposals.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I466454984fd919ebef35f2b37ddb5d86dc842996
Our threads now also contain all replies to their sub-threads.
This is similar to how sections work in MediaWiki, where the parent
section also contains the content of all the lower-level sections.
We're going to need this for notifications about replies in a thread.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I241fc58e2088a7555942824b0f184ed21e3a8b6f
Previously, only comments could have IDs, because we only needed IDs
for replying. But we might also use them for notifications soon.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I1bcad02bf17ab54bc5028a959543c10f0430836b
I haven't really reviewed the outputs, but at least a) they don't
crash b) they will fail if the output suddenly changes (which could
cause problems due to caching).
Bug: T252555
Change-Id: I1bbcbc5dd17ce1e24b3622062f5e8df4baf5f389
When a comment ended before the end of a paragraph, the next
comment would begin right there in the middle of the paragraph.
This could result in the detected indentation level of that
comment being incorrect, and replies being inserted in wrong
places, as seen in the 'signatures-funny' test case.
The code moved to the parser was previously repeated twice in
addListItem() and addReplyLink(), which should have been a hint
that something isn't quite right.
Also, fix the code guarding against overlapping signatures,
now that signatures may not be at the end of a comment.
Bug: T260855
Change-Id: Ic26a87642f8a15d5de2f7073d4d8176b299c7f94
Expand the 'signatures-funny' test case with more examples, which
don't behave correctly.
Follow-up commits I04a8ea09401e06f2d4bb1f226f17eb528b29ed95 and
Ic26a87642f8a15d5de2f7073d4d8176b299c7f94 fix them.
Bug: T255738
Change-Id: I0fdd8bdf11b497ffeed37c37953c5730f6e4f3b7
Previously we preferred that, but used '*' (<ul><li>) when the parent
comment or the previous reply also used it.
Bug: T252708
Change-Id: I3abf606da6693905764f1be745fad999fdf57fbe
