* We don't need it anywhere in JS, since we're not sending that HTML
to Parsoid.
* We only need it on the nodes directly containing our reply lines in
PHP, not all over the place.
Change-Id: I0a04388225f32654dda2f599442cd27a303b5d0a
When we encounter a node that doesn't represent comment contents, e.g.:
* a [reply] link we inserted (T297034#7641334)
* an {{outdent}} template (see changed test case)
…we should ignore it together with its descendants (like in
Parser#nextInterestingLeafNode), instead of processing descendants
and possibly detecting comment contents in them.
Follow-up to 8de940b587,
72b9c2c6f5.
Bug: T297034
Change-Id: Ib2fa40c5fa389572b0e88ef558728fa06e3621b0
Prior to 8de940b5, the comments on this page would not be marked as
partially transcluded.
Bug: T298408
Change-Id: Ib7eb8b4113151048c0e778b3530600d98dd8f705
These are not used for anything yet, but soon the parser will
want to know the title of the page it is parsing.
Change-Id: I02fa5d63fae78f3e92032d93bc27ac5c744faecb
Reimplement getFullyCoveredSiblings() using compareRanges(), which
checks basically the same thing, but works better and I like it more.
Bug: T297034
Change-Id: I33dc1d088bdee984064315290e378bfbfa830b10
Previously: 569db3603c (2020-06).
Unfortunately we've found cases where the previous implementation
doesn't work correctly, resulting in comments being added to the wrong
pages or page corruption.
Bug: T289873
Bug: T298051
Change-Id: Id867b3005ebc46906d6df852a525fcaec9e6b19b
Comment boundaries are stored as a DOM parent node plus a child index.
Because of that, inserting anything into the DOM before a comment –
such as another comment's start/end markers – would cause us to insert
subsequent comments' markers into the wrong places.
This issue didn't affect many pages, because usually any parent node
would have just one comment in it. Only pages with comment boundaries
outside of any wrappers (directly inside the root node) were broken.
Just process the list in reverse to fix this.
Bug: T298096
Change-Id: Iccffc36b71e9fcf3d72c4db2b9459d39042f7a2d
Servers as another test case for partially transcluded comments,
and a test case for comment start markers placed outside of
paragraphs.
Bug: T298051
Bug: T298096
Change-Id: Id07d2f57708c037578cb653c83848490c9a15fc6
Usually this isn't a problem, because the comments are marked as
template-generated and we don't allow replying to them. But we had a
special case where we were trying to skip over some invisible
elements, which was causing us to skip into the middle of the
about-group in some cases. When Parsoid sees that, it serializes the
contents twice.
Bug: T290940
Change-Id: I9fe0b8d43ab874ccef371990799f77bfc46bc954
The PHP DOM extension measures lengths and offsets in Unicode codepoints.
Our PHP code used UTF-8 bytes, causing some offsets to be slightly off.
Now it mostly uses Unicode codepoints as well (we're forced to use bytes
in a few places, because preg_match returns offsets in bytes).
In practice, this had no visible effect to the user. It caused the
markers `<span data-mw-comment-end="..."></span>` to be placed at
the end of their container instead of the correct position when the
timestamp contained multibyte characters (e.g. "ź" in Polish); but
the correct position is usually at the end of the container anyway.
In the test cases, the only difference is placing these markers before
a trailing line break inside `<p>...</p>` tags rather than before it.
The patch also accidentally fixes another bug, where element nodes
with no children (mostly <img>) were incorrectly excluded when calling
cloneContents(), because they were treated as if they were text nodes.
Change-Id: Iccdccf1078598f4b62cab96225e9c85a4c0e93ee
If the user talk edit or mention coincides with exactly one new comment:
* Change the primary link to be a direct link to the comment
* Add a text snippet to notifications that don't already include one
(user talk edits that are not new sections).
This is done for all such notifications, regardless of whether anyone
has topic subscriptions enabled.
Bug: T281590
Bug: T253082
Change-Id: I98fbca8e57845cd7c82ad533c393db953e4e5643
* ThreadItem::getText
* CommentItem::getBodyText (used when generating notifications)
* ThreadItem::getHTML (may soon be used in API)
* CommentItem::getBodyHTML (may soon be used in API)
* ImmutableRange::cloneContents (the common implementation for all
of the above)
The outputs are only lightly reviewed. This is mostly meant to
document the current behavior rather than the expected behavior,
to avoid making unintentional changes while refactoring.
Change-Id: I14471ee4969aa3d0b5577d9de2a6d4462fab4d09
The code (prior to d25825a754) assumed
that level 3+ headings would always follow a level 2 heading or the
placeholder heading, but we don't generate a placeholder heading if
there are no comments in section zero.
Add more tests to confirm that comments under level 3+ headings (that
are not sub-headings of level 2), and level 1 headings, are ignored
when generating notifications, and do not mess with normal headings.
Bug: T288775
Change-Id: Ic57b56752a4797cb01234f66e0ed7b849752bd70
Adding test cases in a separate commit to make it easier to review how
the test results change after I98fbca8e.
* For mentions, the 'mentioned-users' extra parameter is copied to our
event (which is then used to avoid duplicate notifications).
* For user talk page edit, nothing special happens right now (we use
the target page title to avoid duplicate notifications, but this is
not apparent from the test case, since page titles are not present).
Bug: T281590
Bug: T253082
Change-Id: I153e7735f63f1e2643ed881281d807313cd699c3
In case 4 and case 6, no notifications are expected. In all other
cases we now get the expected notifications.
Bug: T285528
Change-Id: I9e813bb3a053bc1232783f9eae1ad75672b4fa7e
Adding test cases in a separate commit to make it easier to review how
the test results change.
As expected, in every case, no notifications are generated right now.
Bug: T285528
Change-Id: I25308754112c521d2db8c54ef0c82373456d9e31
The user interface only allows you to subscribe to level 2 headings.
But we would generate events for whatever heading was the closest,
If it was e.g. level 3, no one would receive that notification.
Now we generate events for the closest level 2 heading, or we don't
generate the event at all if there isn't one (if the only headings are
of level 3 and below, or level 1, or if the comment is added before
the first heading on the page).
Bug: T286736
Change-Id: Iae99853070e353ab81c9cc29ef1d53c877adfc66
The issue occurred when replying to a comment consisting of multiple
list items, starting with a <dt> (instead of the expected <dd>), so
that the comment is considered to be unindented.
Modifier tried to add the reply directly inside the list (<dl>) rather
than inside the last list item (<dt>), which caused it to be confused
about indentation levels and try to un-indent more times than there
were indentations.
The simplest solution, given the existing code, is to add the reply
outside the list instead, in a new list. This results in a "list gap"
(<dl><dt>...</dt><dd>...</dd></dl><dl><dd>...</dd></dl>), but I think
it's acceptable for this rare case.
There are separate tests cases for old Parser and for Parsoid HTML,
because they parse the original wikitext differently (with the old
Parser producing HTML with a list gap too).
Bug: T279445
Change-Id: Ie0ee960e7090cf051ee547b480c980e9530eda51
We added it because the initial designs for the subscribe action were
much easier to implement like this, and topic "containers" (T269950)
would have required it.
However, the latest design of the subscribe action will not need it
(T279149), and topic containers are still very far away, so let's
remove it for now.
Bug: T280433
Change-Id: I21a23e9bea43f24d265750926fbd62b99038d3f1
The existing comment IDs can't be used to find the same comment on
a different revision or page (when it's transcluded), because they
depend on the comment's parent and its position on the page.
Comment names depend only on the author and timestamp. The trade-off
is that they can't distinguish comments posted within the same minute,
or in the same edit, so we will still need the IDs sometimes.
Prefer using comment names when replying, if they're not ambiguous.
This fixes T273413 and T275821.
Heading names depend on the author and timestamp of the oldest comment.
This way we don't have to detect changes to the heading text, but we
can't distinguish headings without any comments.
Bug: T274685
Bug: T273413
Bug: T275821
Change-Id: Id85c50ba38d1e532cec106708c077b908a3fcd49
Longer, but follows the style guide and less likely to conflict.
We need to account for init classes in the cache being around for
a while.
Change-Id: I738bc93393850db320fdbda2b003ca8ac40556da
The code we're testing already produces a string of serialized HTML,
no need to parse and re-serialize it.
Also, we recently learned that the precise format matters here
(T274709), and now this test *actually* covers the fix for that bug.
Follow-up to 5b26e9664b.
As a downside, this test might now spuriously fail if the format of
the output of Parsoid's XMLSerializer changes. Hopefully that won't
happen too often.
Change-Id: I69b514f545e47dcb437fb39a83edb8e2f19ed99b
Now it detect signatures generated by en.wp's {{Undated}} template,
and signatures of people who do weird stuff to the timestamps.
Bug: T275938
Change-Id: I27b07f6786ca5433a3c02a5fe68e4716d41401bb
The horrendous 11-line if() condition did not correctly handle
signatures wrapped in inline formatting markup, like <small>.
Instead, implement this logic in the code for skipping to the end
of a paragraph, which didn't exist yet when that condition was
added, but seems like a much better place to check this now.
Bug: T275934
Change-Id: I5cccff889b5e15b5f8fde0538bf4bccb22e762cf
