Makes the class more similar to PHP. The non-native
ranges exist for efficiency, but users will usually
want native ranges.
Change-Id: Ifd7dd034d2e0f3b9af050ecdab3e063df73dde5e
The implementation in Parser doesn't descend into sub-thread.
Re-use the getThreadSummary method in ThreadItem and traverse
the thread properly.
Bug: T298617
Change-Id: I318d9012eb83f37ccbe463923524ef2e9f995ced
We can no longer change IDs so easily, because they're stored in the
permalink database, so remove this mechanism to make sure it's not
accidentally used in the future.
Change-Id: I392ee1f49c48fc2f23d05e9a37c643438b4f2b9a
For comments posted on or after 2022-07-12 (configurable), use a
shorter format, identical to the timestamps MediaWiki uses in URLs.
Changing the format for already existing comments would involve
difficult migrations, therefore we elect not to do it.
Bug: T304595
Change-Id: I387051a6a3a1d84cfae45c3e1516db870cc8b977
It's needed for the fix for T303396 to work correctly (in the case
where there's exactly 1 thread item on the page), and for the
highlight improvements in Iadbf83e02801fd9bd6336c84015994ee2819ce51.
Change-Id: I2b2f5535ebbf792910133622a271ac1491c74de6
Change the HeadingItem constructor to take a 'null' headingLevel
and store this internally with the constant. Change the JSON
serializer to convert this back to null.
Change-Id: I27508eed75d94b99c5189548919309f8da7deb75
Goal:
-----
Finishing the work from Iadb7757debe000025e52770ca51ebcf24ca8ee66
by changing CommentParser::parse() to return a data object, instead of
the whole parser.
Changes:
--------
ThreadItemSet.php:
ThreadItemSet.js:
* New data class to access the results of parsing a discussion. Most
methods and properties are moved from CommentParser with no changes.
CommentParser.php:
Parser.js:
* parse() returns a new ThreadItemSet.
* Remove methods moved to ThreadItemSet.
* Placeholder headings are generated slightly differently, as we process
things in a different order.
* Grouping threads and computing IDs/names is no longer lazy. We always
needed IDs/names anyway.
* computeId() explicitly uses a ThreadItemSet to check the existing IDs
when de-duplicating.
controller.js:
* Move the code for turning some nodes annotated by CommentFormatter
into a ThreadItemSet (previously a Parser) from controller#init to
ThreadItemSet.static.newFromAnnotatedNodes, and rewrite it to handle
assigning parents/replies and recalculating legacy IDs more nicely.
* mw.dt.pageThreads is now a ThreadItemSet.
Change-Id: I49bfe019aa460651447fd383f73eafa9d7180a92
We're probably not going to use it again, and I don't want to make the
effort of rewriting it in Id867b3005ebc46906d6df852a525fcaec9e6b19b.
Change-Id: I0b02533f7c9b8c1b0df271e03a74063f123d0dff
These types can be passed a parameters to any file without
creating a dependency, so it makes more sense to allow
the globally.
Change-Id: I5504465fd997b46547642e7046993b370b85586e
The modifier crashes if endContainer is a <p>/<dd>/<li> node, and
it often is if we try to exclude the end marker from the range.
It doesn't matter for T281471, so let's just leave it that way.
(This is also more similar to the range produced by our parser.)
Follow-up to c4ba8e921a. No idea how
I missed this when testing that patch.
Also, improve comments.
Bug: T281471
Change-Id: If6aba34acf29c37d06fb0ca92547f78b58695597
This produces nicer results when we call Range#getBoundingClientRect
on them later, when drawing comment highlights (using Firefox).
I'm not sure how this will affect everything in modifier, but it
doesn't seem to be causing issues. If it does cause trouble, then we
should instead adjust the range this way in controller#highlight.
Bug: T281471
Change-Id: I6f204b858990023f42f564cca7a2d24d322f872e
The existing comment IDs can't be used to find the same comment on
a different revision or page (when it's transcluded), because they
depend on the comment's parent and its position on the page.
Comment names depend only on the author and timestamp. The trade-off
is that they can't distinguish comments posted within the same minute,
or in the same edit, so we will still need the IDs sometimes.
Prefer using comment names when replying, if they're not ambiguous.
This fixes T273413 and T275821.
Heading names depend on the author and timestamp of the oldest comment.
This way we don't have to detect changes to the heading text, but we
can't distinguish headings without any comments.
Bug: T274685
Bug: T273413
Bug: T275821
Change-Id: Id85c50ba38d1e532cec106708c077b908a3fcd49
After recent changes allowing ThreadItems to have IDs, they can now
also have warnings about duplicate IDs.
Bug: T267035
Change-Id: If3edfe34e6e29741e29fac8946a3c88badc4ab7f
Our threads now also contain all replies to their sub-threads.
This is similar to how sections work in MediaWiki, where the parent
section also contains the content of all the lower-level sections.
We're going to need this for notifications about replies in a thread.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I241fc58e2088a7555942824b0f184ed21e3a8b6f
The output of CommentFormatter::addReplyLinks() and consequently
ThreadItem::jsonSerialize() can end up in the HTTP cache (Varnish) on
Wikimedia wikis. We need to consider that when changing that code.
Introduce a concept of legacy ID (generated by the older algorithm
after it changes), add some placeholder code that will generate them
in the future, and update some code to find comments by either normal
or legacy IDs.
Add dire comments in a bunch of places (as if that ever helps).
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I4368f366800ab21b8b184b09378037614fdecd33
Previously, parser would output offsets that don't exist in their
containers, because we were pretending that entities are parts of
their neighboring text nodes.
Turns out it's much easier to do it right when going backwards.
Change-Id: I9bccca2d403f1a976ae517449989170cdd99721e
When adding a reply, we take a node at the end of the previous comment,
compare that comment's indentation level to the expected indentation level
of the reply, and add (or remove) that number of wrapper lists.
The existing code did not consider that comments may have lists within
them, and so the indentation of that node may not match the indentation
of the comment.
Bug: T252702
Change-Id: Icc5ff19783d2b213bff99f283cb0599a8b5c1ab4
