From in-person code review with Amir: using tableExists() is a bad
idea, because the table might not consistently exists on all replicas.
It's better to have a config option despite the inconvenience.
Bug: T315353
Change-Id: I728759634c454c0dcbdc4603c15cab60415c7c03
It turns out that using the "enableSectionEditLinks" post-cache
transform option was not a good idea, as it is also set when viewing
old revisions and in some other cases.
However, in the pre-cache parsing, we have access to getIsPreview(),
which is exactly what we want. I think we can safely do this there.
We were already using that prior to 2bc76dabd7.
Bug: T314260
Change-Id: I7f769db48eff9fa434483902a4b5ac2f5fc96b3d
We remove the [reply] and [subscribe] links when they should not be
visible (controlled by 'enableSectionEditLinks' option, which is
disabled when previewing).
Bug: T309423
Change-Id: Ie0d3fba2c4d166daac3ea2e117a246c9584284ca
For comments posted on or after 2022-07-12 (configurable), use a
shorter format, identical to the timestamps MediaWiki uses in URLs.
Changing the format for already existing comments would involve
difficult migrations, therefore we elect not to do it.
Bug: T304595
Change-Id: I387051a6a3a1d84cfae45c3e1516db870cc8b977
We switched to our memory-wrapped store everywhere outside the
VE surface, but not in the VE surface itself.
Change the way we construct MemoryStorage objects so that they can
be constructed from a specific mw.SafeStorage instance.
Ensure MemoryStorage's cache is populated with initial storage object
data, and that the cache is copied over when we create derivative
objectes.
Bug: T310438
Change-Id: I652428f114dc5169195887cb8ca719ae196bb76f
Topic subscription test is going to be all logged in users only, no
transitory enrollment conditions, so we can remove the anonymous user
handling and DB writes.
Bug: T302515
Bug: T304030
Change-Id: I5e57bb9b7958576f3a04373748331a86f4626fb5
We added the limit out of abundance of caution, because we were not
sure how the table is going to grow. We can see now that it's growing
slowly and reasonably.
Bug: T294881
Change-Id: I5da444c5d070926452e96ddbbe728b9e0375e466
The ParserAfterParse hook will likely be deprecated, as Parsoid can't
properly support it as-is. Luckily, DiscussionTools isn't doing
anything in ParserAfterParse that couldn't happen in the (supported)
ParserAfterTidy hook.
Bug: T303630
Change-Id: If72feb1e277c09f4ea0df339f2dd097a9b329d71
Also fix a bug where headings would be ignored while checking for
comment frames. See task for detailed explanation.
Bug: T303396
Change-Id: I6495826b4b050ea80680e0798ac6ab4497a7c09e
Links are generated to:
* Single comments, by a user or by a notification
* Potentially multiple comments (new comments since T),
usually just by notifications.
If in either case no comments are found to highlight, warn the
user so they get some visual feedback that the notification worked
as expected, but that the comment was just deleted since.
Bug: T301602
Change-Id: I090c904481cf6f3e9f964fa43b10001e75b0bc90
Previously, we required a signature at the end of the comment.
This was a pretty rough heuristic that did not correctly handle
many comments that we would consider entirely properly signed
in CommentParser (e.g. comments wrapped in formatting like
<small>…</small>, comments with a post-scriptum or in parentheses,
or comments generated by various templates).
Now we process the user input using the same code that adds reply
links, and only add a signature when we detect that there really
isn't a signature (including template-generated), or if the signature
is in the wrong place and would result in the reply link showing up
in the wrong place as well (not at the end of the comment).
Bug: T278442
Bug: T268558
Bug: T278355
Bug: T291421
Bug: T282983
Change-Id: I46b6110af328ebdf93b7dfc2bd941e04391a1599
We were rendering the preview in a completely different way from how
we would add the real reply, and the results would be different
sometimes, particularly for multi-line comments with messed-up markup.
Render it server-side instead, in a very similar way to real replies
(generating a DOM list node and transforming it through Parsoid),
although without the whole context of the page to improve performance.
We can remove a lot of client-side code that was used solely for this.
This will allow the preview to accurately display the signatures when
we change how they are added (T278442), without us having to implement
those changes again from scratch for the preview.
Change-Id: I53341f4d4075c25b67ec3b3032bff9b8a880dcd3
Goal:
-----
Finishing the work from Iadb7757debe000025e52770ca51ebcf24ca8ee66
by changing CommentParser::parse() to return a data object, instead of
the whole parser.
Changes:
--------
ThreadItemSet.php:
ThreadItemSet.js:
* New data class to access the results of parsing a discussion. Most
methods and properties are moved from CommentParser with no changes.
CommentParser.php:
Parser.js:
* parse() returns a new ThreadItemSet.
* Remove methods moved to ThreadItemSet.
* Placeholder headings are generated slightly differently, as we process
things in a different order.
* Grouping threads and computing IDs/names is no longer lazy. We always
needed IDs/names anyway.
* computeId() explicitly uses a ThreadItemSet to check the existing IDs
when de-duplicating.
controller.js:
* Move the code for turning some nodes annotated by CommentFormatter
into a ThreadItemSet (previously a Parser) from controller#init to
ThreadItemSet.static.newFromAnnotatedNodes, and rewrite it to handle
assigning parents/replies and recalculating legacy IDs more nicely.
* mw.dt.pageThreads is now a ThreadItemSet.
Change-Id: I49bfe019aa460651447fd383f73eafa9d7180a92
The Data class contained utilities for two unrelated purposes.
Split each half to a separate class.
Notably, this improves the signature of the getLocalData() function.
Change-Id: Icde615fb9d483fee1f352c34909b37f8ffde8081
For two given revisions, this API tells us which comments have
been added and which have been removed.
Can be used to highlight new comments, or check if the page
has been updated since we first loaded it.
Bug: T281624
Bug: T300504
Change-Id: Ia4d95ffe3b7cf2317cd8e7c0f034e09f64777ef3
Only show the reload prompt if the 'disappeared' error is detected
when the reply widget is loading. Don't show it if we failed
to save, as it suggests you will not lose content if you reload.
Change-Id: I106f274e180dc97b540d729e31aae575c43f29f0
This is now deployed on all wikis, and going forward I don't think
we need to make this configurable.
Change-Id: I231976267ba6cdfeec622efaa15983a84c330649
