For compatibility with Parsoid's document abstraction (Parsoid may
switch to an alternate DOM library in the future), don't explicitly
create a new document object using `new DOMDocument`; instead use
the Parsoid wrapper `DOMCompat::newDocument()`. This ensures that
the Document object created will be compatible with Parsoid.
There are a number of other subtle dependencies on the PHP `dom`
extension in DiscussionTools, like explicit `instanceof` tests; those
will be tweaked in a follow-up patch
(I3c4f41c3819770f85d68157c9f690d650b7266a3) since they do not affect
correctness so long as Parsoid is aliasing Document to a subclass of
the built-in DOMDocument. Similarly, the Phan warnings we suppress
do not cause runtime errors (because of the fixes included in
c5265341afd9efde6b54ba56dc009aab88eff83c) but phan will be happier
once the follow-up patch lands and aligns all the DOM types.
Bug: T287611
Depends-On: If0671255779571a91d3472a9d90d0f2d69dd1f7d
Change-Id: Ib98bd5b76de7a0d32a29840d1ce04379c72ef486
Now it detect signatures generated by en.wp's {{Undated}} template,
and signatures of people who do weird stuff to the timestamps.
Bug: T275938
Change-Id: I27b07f6786ca5433a3c02a5fe68e4716d41401bb
In some cases it would return the parent node, instead of the siblings
it should return.
It's a private method only called by getFullyCoveredSiblings(), and
that method had a bug that cancelled out this one, so everything
worked correctly. But I want to use it elsewhere now and ran into it.
Change-Id: Ic12f007d57a8502a1bea5f0af17b29e9d59093d6
I found this error in our logstash. I was not able to find an
existing Phabricator ticket.
Note how line #348 extracts the last element from the
$siblings array. It uses the function end() there, which
returns false in case the array is empty. $siblings[0] can't
do this but yields an error.
An alternative is to use reset(), which can return false as
well. But that's not really better. Especially not better
readable, I would argue.
Change-Id: Ic90cd2392ede15078ba0d5b4d67b8dc5d05f9bf7
* Ignore rendering-transparent nodes between discussion comments.
* Improve isRenderingTransparentNode() so that <link> nodes
representing TemplateStyles are not considered transparent,
otherwise this would undo ae920b831f.
Using a regexp from Parsoid.
Bug: T272746
Change-Id: I0b3c3251156ba6c4826abf5ba44ea93f80ebc01d
Add yet another tree walking utility: CommentUtils::linearWalk().
Unlike TreeWalker, it allows handling the beginnings and ends of nodes
separately – kind of like parsing a XML token stream, or kind of like
VisualEditor's linear model.
(Add unit tests for this utility. The simple.html test case is copied
from [VisualEditor/VisualEditor]/demos/ve/pages/simple.html.)
Use this utility to stop skipping when we reach either a closing or
opening block node tag. Previously we'd skip over such tags inside
nested "transparent" nodes (like <a>, <del>, or apparently <font>).
Bug: T271385
Change-Id: I201a942eb3a56335e84d94e150ec2c33f8b4f4e0
As a result of 0fc71f60cd, "empty" text
nodes (containing only whitespace) at the end of the comment may be
inside the comment's range, and trying to ignore them caused the
ranges not to match and the frame not to be detected.
Now the code works whether they're inside the comment's range or not.
Add a test case for wrapped discussion comments with HTML comments and
with whitespace.
Bug: T250126
Bug: T268407
Change-Id: I2217ff5a635fd1c9c9e803f46795b1bfb3d17535
Move the code so that we check for "?title=" query parameter first,
because we don't handle this right in the other code path.
Use parse_url() instead of wfParseUrl() because the latter doesn't
accept relative URLs, and we don't care about the other differences.
Bug: T261711
Depends-On: I4da952876e1c3d1a41d06b51f7e26015ff5e34d7
Change-Id: I70fac2b41befd782b0a47a4f726ae748dc0f775d
When a comment ended before the end of a paragraph, the next
comment would begin right there in the middle of the paragraph.
This could result in the detected indentation level of that
comment being incorrect, and replies being inserted in wrong
places, as seen in the 'signatures-funny' test case.
The code moved to the parser was previously repeated twice in
addListItem() and addReplyLink(), which should have been a hint
that something isn't quite right.
Also, fix the code guarding against overlapping signatures,
now that signatures may not be at the end of a comment.
Bug: T260855
Change-Id: Ic26a87642f8a15d5de2f7073d4d8176b299c7f94
When adding a reply, we take a node at the end of the previous comment,
compare that comment's indentation level to the expected indentation level
of the reply, and add (or remove) that number of wrapper lists.
The existing code did not consider that comments may have lists within
them, and so the indentation of that node may not match the indentation
of the comment.
Bug: T252702
Change-Id: Icc5ff19783d2b213bff99f283cb0599a8b5c1ab4
* Move modifier#getFullyCoveredWrapper to utils
* Use that method to find the node where we start searching for
template wrappers, rather than using endContainer
Bug: T252058
Change-Id: I55de58102f3468fce01290bd413a7fdc96d322d6
