We remove the [reply] and [subscribe] links when they should not be
visible (controlled by 'enableSectionEditLinks' option, which is
disabled when previewing).
Bug: T309423
Change-Id: Ie0d3fba2c4d166daac3ea2e117a246c9584284ca
While in many cases the class will never be sub-classed, it's easier
just to always use static:: and not worry about predicting which
classes might have problems in the future.
Change-Id: I23072a1701b5acf62bb3379a877de97627d8fcf3
Topic subscription test is going to be all logged in users only, no
transitory enrollment conditions, so we can remove the anonymous user
handling and DB writes.
Bug: T302515
Bug: T304030
Change-Id: I5e57bb9b7958576f3a04373748331a86f4626fb5
When 'DiscussionToolsEnableMobile' was false, we were falling back to
the desktop configuration, rather than disabling everything.
When 'DiscussionToolsEnableMobile' was true, we were enabling the
selected features on every page, instead of only discussion pages.
Follow-up to b4f10c5638.
Bug: T302388
Change-Id: Ib4a42d5acd9da528e931c74de7a870d4be513d69
This is now deployed on all wikis, and going forward I don't think
we need to make this configurable.
Change-Id: I231976267ba6cdfeec622efaa15983a84c330649
We realized that any change made to Special:Preferences will set the
beta preference even if they didn't visit the beta tab, so we can't
actually tell if manual intent was involved. As such, we'll enroll
people regardless of their beta setting -- they can disable the feature
through regular preferences if they want, and that'll be respected.
Bug: T291307
Change-Id: I8c1cbf51060012e8e68af252da84944dfcc681d8
Trigger off the (absence of the) new preference for tracking topic tool
usage.
Change the name of the bucket preference so anyone who was enrolled in
the prior abtest won't find themselves re-enrolled.
Update the abtest enrollment code so it explicitly sets the preference
for the feature. This is a trade-off -- it does mean that we'll need to
special-case *unenrollment* once the abtest is disabled if we want to
just quietly revert people to the wiki's default, but it also means that
Special:Preferences will be accurate.
Bug: T291307
Change-Id: I659679e05b65fc7db05e249114e5a7de4cf55816
This reverts commit 99b757465a.
Reason for revert: We may never need the 'behind-overlay' setting
and it is untested and probably broken.
Bug: T295816
Change-Id: I9e128862271697ece5241d0e98727174b42f54ff
* Use featuresEnabled.newtopictool to decide when new topic
links might exist on the page, instead of relying on
`#ca-addsection` existing. Change the logic of that feature
flag to check if __NONEWSECTIONLINK__ is on the page.
* Render the add-topic button locally in a hook to replace
the one suppressed by onMinervaNeueTalkPageOverlay. Do so
whenever the newtopictool feature is enabled (see above).
Bug: T270537
Change-Id: I3e3f7403b3b86bb84fcb75a8833919512519b70f
They were spread across several places, and some of them were checking
different things, causing us to show the view mode on some
action=edit&redlink=1 links but without showing our empty state.
Bug: T291085
Change-Id: Id1864e58c47dbd22abb41d48e31f81318d9f94f9
This approach is used in our new topic tool empty state code and is
much nicer. Also fix typo in a comment nearby.
Change-Id: I80755ef0960a172b0f370c36c1979a86498d6fa9
This includes the dtrepliedto URL functionality from
I3f81e4d77faed367606e47678b8896051982359d.
Bug: T274831
Bug: T274832
Bug: T277329
Change-Id: I035d04f30c8312b0cb42902d3bf940df1482ffb3
…without making the topic subscriptions feature available in user preferences.
Follow-up to these commits, which added these checks in ad-hoc ways:
* 9420f22e9d
* f3422f40a6
* 23a490deca
* a555db7892
Bug: T284491
Change-Id: If2e3fb1e06d1cc489fbca14796ed77c83bb52991
Previously we relied on the NamespaceInfo check below to reject
special pages, but after commit 07d885248bc54bdc0f12d9745916c794d45ec81c
in MediaWiki core, PageProps throws an exception when called with a
special page.
Bug: T281180
Depends-On: I32c94107fde96b9d6344c77b621be9b3b9b7faaf
Change-Id: I0fd893c63a6e92f6c84e7aa92270852e1137fcad
The 'dtenable' does not appear to take user-provided content that
requires language normalization. In general getRawVal should be used,
or if it's user input that needs normalization, use getText(). Perhaps
one day we'll alias or deprecate getVal (which is currently an odd
mid-way hybrid, most closely to getText; originally created for
EditPage.php textareas).
Change-Id: I8364c84f8c4f700da6e208df2e87c29bf254d685
We can't allow it, because the required database tables may not exist
yet (T280082).
This is meant to be temporary until we complete DBA review and the
tables are created.
Bug: T280082
Change-Id: I8f947b779c6829763d3413931c6d354e6f7aee4d
Longer, but follows the style guide and less likely to conflict.
We need to account for init classes in the cache being around for
a while.
Change-Id: I738bc93393850db320fdbda2b003ca8ac40556da
* HookUtils:FEATURES lists all features
* CommentFormatter::USE_WITH_FEATURES are all features
which require the comment formatter
Change-Id: Idbbe8bdd910b9c7b23c7fee76af7bb7ee13c2759
