For two given revisions, this API tells us which comments have
been added and which have been removed.
Can be used to highlight new comments, or check if the page
has been updated since we first loaded it.
Bug: T281624
Bug: T300504
Change-Id: Ia4d95ffe3b7cf2317cd8e7c0f034e09f64777ef3
Only show the reload prompt if the 'disappeared' error is detected
when the reply widget is loading. Don't show it if we failed
to save, as it suggests you will not lose content if you reload.
Change-Id: I106f274e180dc97b540d729e31aae575c43f29f0
It's an arbitrary limit, it seems harmless to relax it to support the
use case in the task, even if it's weird.
Bug: T300949
Change-Id: I7c895c7019726758bbae3183b9c3ecbd9eabcf38
This is now deployed on all wikis, and going forward I don't think
we need to make this configurable.
Change-Id: I231976267ba6cdfeec622efaa15983a84c330649
Goal: To be able to re-use or test the transformations we previously
performed in addWikitextReply() / addHtmlReply(), without requiring
a Comment object or adding the result as a reply.
Change-Id: I040c4be9b6b9bddba661f30fd0566f8850673074
Clearing the widget removes all the surfaces, meaning there are
no doc-state variables to cleanup. Switch the order of these
two calls.
Change-Id: I6c095a171096cd700ce4cd31b08fa3b982ab2401
* Document all methods
* Rename comment to threadItem
* Use this.threadItem instead of passing in identical
threadItem in various methods.
* Don't pass threadItem to ReplyWidget as we already
pass the whole CommentController.
Change-Id: If9aad0bcf9f0e4ebf3342b75631ddac8b57f7d87
* We don't need it anywhere in JS, since we're not sending that HTML
to Parsoid.
* We only need it on the nodes directly containing our reply lines in
PHP, not all over the place.
Change-Id: I0a04388225f32654dda2f599442cd27a303b5d0a
After switching from source mode to visual mode, there will be some
Parsoid-generated white space between block nodes, which remains when
the reply is posted in visual mode.
Follow-up to e064f43499.
Bug: T300439
Change-Id: Ia5d2c06f0a4125e9f148eddd3235f95138c9d37f
When we encounter a node that doesn't represent comment contents, e.g.:
* a [reply] link we inserted (T297034#7641334)
* an {{outdent}} template (see changed test case)
…we should ignore it together with its descendants (like in
Parser#nextInterestingLeafNode), instead of processing descendants
and possibly detecting comment contents in them.
Follow-up to 8de940b587,
72b9c2c6f5.
Bug: T297034
Change-Id: Ib2fa40c5fa389572b0e88ef558728fa06e3621b0
