While in many cases the class will never be sub-classed, it's easier
just to always use static:: and not worry about predicting which
classes might have problems in the future.
Change-Id: I23072a1701b5acf62bb3379a877de97627d8fcf3
Exposed as DiscussionToolsPageInfo prop threaditemshtml. It returns a
version of the output of CommentParser, lightly adjusted to provide a
nested comment structure rather than a pure flat list.
Bug: T285971
Change-Id: I2f8503d4ed740a04fb2f1e3a37ae4db649b3faba
Also, in ThreadItem::getSinglePageTransclusionTitle(), we don't need
this terribly complicated method.
Change-Id: If02c09aaa2f4dd66b2bc253a1edec4ea107564ee
It adds white-space between block tags and strips invisible tags.
It may be slightly slower (it takes HTML as input rather than DOM, so
we need to serialize the HTML first and then call it, rather than only
find and concatenate text nodes), but the difference is negligible,
and it seems better to use this method than to try to re-implement it.
Test runtime went from ~9.0s to ~9.5s locally, when testing using:
php tests/phpunit/phpunit.php \
extensions/DiscussionTools/tests/phpunit/ThreadItemTest.php \
--filter getText
Bug: T219138
Change-Id: I0cb89ebd2160e1ef499b78573c6688f493a4c42f
Previously: 569db3603c (2020-06).
Unfortunately we've found cases where the previous implementation
doesn't work correctly, resulting in comments being added to the wrong
pages or page corruption.
Bug: T289873
Bug: T298051
Change-Id: Id867b3005ebc46906d6df852a525fcaec9e6b19b
These changes ensure that DiscussionTools is independent of DOM
library choice, and will not break if/when Parsoid switches to an
alternate (more standards-compliant) DOM library.
We run `phan` against the Dodo standards-compliant DOM library,
so this ends up flagging uses of non-standard PHP extensions to
the DOM. These will be suppressed for now with a "Nonstandard DOM"
comment that can be grepped for, since they will eventually
will need to be rewritten or worked around.
Most frequent issues:
* Node::nodeValue and Node::textContent and Element::getAttribute()
can return null in a spec-compliant implementation. Add `?? ''` to
make spec-compliant results consistent w/ what PHP returns.
* DOMXPath doesn't accept anything except DOMDocument. These uses
should be replaced with DOMCompat::querySelectorAll() or similar
(which end up using DOMXPath under the covers for DOMDocument any way,
but are implemented more efficiently in a spec-compliant
implementation).
* A couple of times we have code like:
`while ($node->firstChild!==null) { $node = $node->firstChild; }`
and phan's analysis isn't strong enough to determine that $node is still
non-null after the while. This same issue should appear with DOMDocument
but phan doesn't complain for some reason.
One apparently legit issue:
* Node::insertBefore() is once called in a funny way which leans on
the fact that the second option is optional in PHP. This seems to be
a workaround for an ancient PHP bug, and can probably be safely
removed.
Bug: T287611
Bug: T217867
Change-Id: I3c4f41c3819770f85d68157c9f690d650b7266a3
For compatibility with Parsoid's document abstraction (Parsoid may
switch to an alternate DOM library in the future), don't explicitly
create a new document object using `new DOMDocument`; instead use
the Parsoid wrapper `DOMCompat::newDocument()`. This ensures that
the Document object created will be compatible with Parsoid.
There are a number of other subtle dependencies on the PHP `dom`
extension in DiscussionTools, like explicit `instanceof` tests; those
will be tweaked in a follow-up patch
(I3c4f41c3819770f85d68157c9f690d650b7266a3) since they do not affect
correctness so long as Parsoid is aliasing Document to a subclass of
the built-in DOMDocument. Similarly, the Phan warnings we suppress
do not cause runtime errors (because of the fixes included in
c5265341afd9efde6b54ba56dc009aab88eff83c) but phan will be happier
once the follow-up patch lands and aligns all the DOM types.
Bug: T287611
Depends-On: If0671255779571a91d3472a9d90d0f2d69dd1f7d
Change-Id: Ib98bd5b76de7a0d32a29840d1ce04379c72ef486
The existing comment IDs can't be used to find the same comment on
a different revision or page (when it's transcluded), because they
depend on the comment's parent and its position on the page.
Comment names depend only on the author and timestamp. The trade-off
is that they can't distinguish comments posted within the same minute,
or in the same edit, so we will still need the IDs sometimes.
Prefer using comment names when replying, if they're not ambiguous.
This fixes T273413 and T275821.
Heading names depend on the author and timestamp of the oldest comment.
This way we don't have to detect changes to the heading text, but we
can't distinguish headings without any comments.
Bug: T274685
Bug: T273413
Bug: T275821
Change-Id: Id85c50ba38d1e532cec106708c077b908a3fcd49
After recent changes allowing ThreadItems to have IDs, they can now
also have warnings about duplicate IDs.
Bug: T267035
Change-Id: If3edfe34e6e29741e29fac8946a3c88badc4ab7f
Our threads now also contain all replies to their sub-threads.
This is similar to how sections work in MediaWiki, where the parent
section also contains the content of all the lower-level sections.
We're going to need this for notifications about replies in a thread.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I241fc58e2088a7555942824b0f184ed21e3a8b6f
Previously, only comments could have IDs, because we only needed IDs
for replying. But we might also use them for notifications soon.
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I1bcad02bf17ab54bc5028a959543c10f0430836b
The output of CommentFormatter::addReplyLinks() and consequently
ThreadItem::jsonSerialize() can end up in the HTTP cache (Varnish) on
Wikimedia wikis. We need to consider that when changing that code.
Introduce a concept of legacy ID (generated by the older algorithm
after it changes), add some placeholder code that will generate them
in the future, and update some code to find comments by either normal
or legacy IDs.
Add dire comments in a bunch of places (as if that ever helps).
Bug: T264478
Change-Id: I4368f366800ab21b8b184b09378037614fdecd33
When adding a reply, we take a node at the end of the previous comment,
compare that comment's indentation level to the expected indentation level
of the reply, and add (or remove) that number of wrapper lists.
The existing code did not consider that comments may have lists within
them, and so the indentation of that node may not match the indentation
of the comment.
Bug: T252702
Change-Id: Icc5ff19783d2b213bff99f283cb0599a8b5c1ab4
* Pass rootNode to the constructor
* Rename getters to match CommentItem/HeadingItem/ThreadItem
value classes.
* Always build the thread tree so CommentItem's always have
and ID and replies/parent.
Change-Id: I508be9534de59016ff806e3d84edcbb1c76cb0c6
